- 44,214
- 2,544
Their won't be a repeat/three-peat for decades.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally Posted by 6 rings MJ
Nah.. the elite players are still going to win multiple titles..
Originally Posted by ACBboyz84
this is Lebron 10th seasons in the league. Old boy is about to go 11 years without a ring . He's going to look like 40 before he win a ring
Originally Posted by quik1987
Top players don't win titles, top teams do.
Originally Posted by 51and3rd
Originally Posted by ACBboyz84
this is Lebron 10th seasons in the league. Old boy is about to go 11 years without a ring . He's going to look like 40 before he win a ring
Please take Kobe out of your avy......
Damn time flies...Originally Posted by ACBboyz84
this is Lebron 10th seasons in the league. Old boy is about to go 11 years without a ring . He's going to look like 40 before he win a ring
Exactly why I say he's overrated. No way should a big man with the potential to dominate a game/the NBA like Dwight can, should not have a title this day and age.Originally Posted by Rexanglorum
The NBA is loaded with great perimeter players. Of the top ten players in the NBA, there is currently no bigman who dominates, in the paint and at both ends of the court (Dirk is a seven footer but he plays like a 3 and Dwight Howard is not dominant offensive force in the way that the truly great centers have been). Aside from Michael Jordan, great wing players are rarely able to win one or more titles as the clear cut focal point of their teams and without a great all around bigman (Bird and Magic and Kobe and Iiah Thomas all had great talent all around and in the paint during their title runs).
I doubt that we will see teams like Pistons and Lakers and Celtic from the 1980's so all of these great wing players today (aside from Kobe Bryant) have to take on the challenge that Michael Jordan had to and only MJ has been able to handle that challenge.
With so few truly great bigs and so many great wing players, the current generation of the NBA's young superstars could involve many greats who win between zero and one or two rings in their careers. If we ever do see someone as great as MJ or a big man who is as good as Shaq, Tim Duncan, Kareem, Hakeem or Bill Russell, we might see a player and a squad that can win three or more rings in a decade or less.
In short, the only three ways that you can win a bunch of rings is to have a vast preponderance of talent (which is hard to do with salary caps and expansion), having a top tier all time big or having Michael Jordan. With that in mind, expect rings to be pretty evenly distributed through out the 2010's and early 2020's.
Originally Posted by KingZarus
^^ The talent level may be better, but the skill isn't. Everybody can jump higher and run faster, but can they run dem plays and not let their ego jack up the team chemistry??
Originally Posted by 3900stabler
Let me add some perspective to this discussion. LBJ is in year 9. If he wins this year, he will be the same age MJ when he won his first ring. The first ring will always be the toughest to get. The Eastern Conference is not wide open. The Heator Knicks will come out the east for years to come (sorry bulls fans).The Big 3 have 4 years remaining after this one ends, you figure at least they play in 2 more finals after this year and split that's 4 finals appearances and 2 rings. The east will become wide open on the downside of LBJ's career. I see Lebron and Wade winning atleast 3-4 titles before Wade retires. Once he retires Lebron will still have another 3 year window to win atleast 1 more between the age of 34-36. The West will be a lot tougher to get through. You got OKC who will be together for another decade, the Clips are coming, you know the league will make sure the Lakers are competitive, Memphis is tough, Dallas may add D.Will or D-12 this off-season. I wouldn't pencil in KD for all those titles just yet.
To me, quality is always better than quantity. If KD wins a bunch of rings but does so and the end of Lebron's career, how would view him as a player? I don't want to see KD will some titles when LBJ is out of his prime. Hopefully over the next 4-5 years the Heat Thunder will play in a couple of finals. After KD, I don't see a player in this league comparable to his talent and he only 23.
Originally Posted by ATLsFinest
I brought up that most of the top 10 players ever have between 3 and 6 titles and how Lebron is never gonna get there.
79 Sonics only had one HOF'erOriginally Posted by 3900stabler
Originally Posted by quik1987
Top players don't win titles, top teams do.
Outside of Pistons, name me a championship team without at least one or multiple HOF or All-stars?. My 97-98 Pacers were a better TEAM than those Bulls. From top to bottom, that Pacers roster was loaded. Compare that roster to the Bulls roster. It aint even close. The Bulls had the best player (Hate you Mike) which is why they went to finals that year and ultimately won the title.
If Scalabrine plays for the Bulls, then no, no he won'tOriginally Posted by georgehimself
Scalabrine gonna get his second ring before Lebron gets his first.
BINGO!Originally Posted by CoupeIt88
Originally Posted by KingZarus
^^ The talent level may be better, but the skill isn't. Everybody can jump higher and run faster, but can they run dem plays and not let their ego jack up the team chemistry??
Agreed on so many levels.
Players are more athletic nowadays, but look at the league right now. We don't have one, not one dominant big man (first time in history). Dwight Howard nor Andrew Bynum can be classified as one, I don't care what ya'll say. In the 90's you had David Robinson, Hakeem, Shaq, and Patrick Ewing (arguably). The skill is not even comparable. Jordan still beat all those guys to, ruthless. Basketball IQ and skill has taken a backseat to athleticism.
Originally Posted by 18th letter
Originally Posted by dland24
I wholeheartedly disagree with the bolded.Originally Posted by airmaxpenny1
I agree somewhat but I just think overall the talent level in the league is greater than it used to be so that makes more teams competitive.
Plus Jordan $!%!$! the game up and now if you don't win 6 rings + completely act like a ruthless maniac your soft so the perception is that 2 or 3 titles isn't a lot even though it is.
KingZarus wrote:
^^ The talent level may be better, but the skill isn't. Everybody can jump higher and run faster, but can they run dem plays and not let their ego jack up the team chemistry??