mplsdunk
Supporter
- May 25, 2004
- 30,367
- 40,981
The thing Biden had going for him was being seen as a nice old man. That’s all out the window.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Very well said.
Mask off is the right pHrase
“Ohhhh women’s rights!! Oh those poor muuuuuuzzzzzlems in Iran whose leaders are oppresors!!!” Man shut up you white Karen looking liberal *****
The thing Biden had going for him was being seen as a nice old man. That’s all out the window.
There is no difference. Nothing you said changes the equation. Research, analyze, compare, conclude.But, here is the difference though...
What's different this time is some of us have been seeing a 24/7 live streamed genocide funded and aided by the U.S. leader in charge.
I am talking about the most inhumane and unimaginable horrors with killings of human beings where we are seeing intestines out of babies bodies and headless and eviscerated people.
We are talking about a party whose leaders and political party are propping, funding and aiding these abominable horrors we are seeing live and with our own eyes 24/7 for 7 months straight.
The Palestinians are then showing us, hey look, right here, U.S.made bomb, look at the ID and manufacturers, this is what's killing us with your tax money.
We didn't see or even get this under Trump.
So if in their values that doesn't fly with them, anymore, why should be forced to vote for the genocidal warmonger candidate ?
nger incumbents.
There is no difference. Nothing you said changes the equation. Research, analyze, compare, conclude.
Let's also not act like gruesome civilian deaths are something new to the US/West. Perhaps you just haven't paid attention. Iraq/Afghanistan war, drone strikes, Libya, supplying weapons to Saudi Arabia to basically wipe Yemen off the map as well. Strange how Yemen is never brought up here. Overwhelmingly more deaths than Palestine since the war started in around 2015. Would you like to guess which president provided the most military aid to Saudi Arabia's bombing and mass starvation campaign in Yemen? And which president subsequently ended that president's policy of aiding the war in Yemen?
If you were to actually research, you would know that Trump is even more pro-Israel and he surrounds himself with the absolute worst neocon warmongers and zionists on top of that.
Strictly on the Palestine issue, the logical conclusion is that in the unlikely best case scenario, Trump will continue as Biden is currently doing. Based on his track record, statements and the advisers he surrounds himself with, Trump will provide significantly more support for Israel.
Then there’s obviously all the other issues that come with Trump. He proudly states he will pardon the Jan 6th criminals who tried to stage a violent coup d’état, etc etc but let's not open that can of worms.
The reality is that neither president is going to be pro-Palestine. This isn't a fairytale.
Again, it doesn't take much research or analysis. Especially if you've been conscious the last 8 years.
All this below is just a tip of the iceberg but doing proper research is not all that time-consuming.
You're not looking then.I don't see anyone calling for Bibi's resignation.
goede hond
goede hond
I find that an extremely privileged position to take from a golden throne, relatively speaking.We're just DONE and don't care to vote either because we have a clearer picture that it is all interlinked and connected to bring forth destruction of humanity and our livelihoods whether domestically or abroad.
Free my dawgGuessing the consequences for that dog might not be so good though...
I find that an extremely privileged position to take from a golden throne, relatively speaking.
Just to be clear, we're not disagreeing on the importance of the Palestine issue here, nor am I questioning your care for the cause.
It is perfectly understandable and normal to experience voter fatigue in general, especially in this situation. I'm well aware the "lesser of 2 evils" method is about as unmotivating as it gets, especially given the options.
In order to help the Palestinians, is it really that much effort to do a bit of research, analysis and conclude which option will most likely be worse?
There is always some nuance. Palestinians are being exterminated but privileged voters act like researching who to vote for is just too hard.
That's hardly new if you've been paying attention and/or read up on modern US foreign policy history going back to at least Reagan.The system, and those who run it, have clearly abandoned any sense of popular wellbeing or even basic accommodations for a vast segment of the population, and they are still wretching the world on fire and killing with impunity for war profiteering and imperialist conquests.
Third party candidates are grifters with an absolute zero chance of winning in the US two party system. Those running as third party candidates are of course well aware of this fact, yet still they raise and raise money, unfortunately conning many average citizens into donating to a non-existent cause.Also, it doesn't mean that some of us won't vote for anyone, just not those political parties anymore who have only robbed us of our basic needs and are complicit in genocides and war crimes.