stockholm patriot
Banned
- 2,796
- 11
Originally Posted by MILLION DOLLAR STACKS
@ facebook thats why i dont even go up there.
it's not facebook, it's the woman that's allowed to have an account
Japan 9.0 Mag. Quake/Tsunami -HAITI stands with Japan [vid]
it's not facebook, it's the woman that's allowed to have an account
stockholm patriot
Banned
- 2,796
- 11
Originally Posted by MILLION DOLLAR STACKS
@ facebook thats why i dont even go up there.
it's not facebook, it's the woman that's allowed to have an account
- 704
- 10
im mad at myself for clicking that spoiler. that ruined my day.
may God humble these uneducated people.
may God humble these uneducated people.
- 704
- 10
im mad at myself for clicking that spoiler. that ruined my day.
may God humble these uneducated people.
may God humble these uneducated people.
- 855
- 10
That Fb %@+ is ignorance at its finest. They prolly think they're either cool for saying that, or actually do think that. But either way it's a shame we have morons like that.
- 855
- 10
That Fb %@+ is ignorance at its finest. They prolly think they're either cool for saying that, or actually do think that. But either way it's a shame we have morons like that.
- 4,201
- 141
Forget those clowns on FB. Never pay any mind to the ignorant and asinine, you're simply giving idiocy an audience.
Anyway, nuclear fears loom regarding TWO reactors, the death toll is skyrocketing, and then there's this, per CNN:
Anyway, nuclear fears loom regarding TWO reactors, the death toll is skyrocketing, and then there's this, per CNN:
- 4,201
- 141
Forget those clowns on FB. Never pay any mind to the ignorant and asinine, you're simply giving idiocy an audience.
Anyway, nuclear fears loom regarding TWO reactors, the death toll is skyrocketing, and then there's this, per CNN:
Anyway, nuclear fears loom regarding TWO reactors, the death toll is skyrocketing, and then there's this, per CNN:
- 17,144
- 1,167
But whats up with the nuclear reactors' placement? Too close to people if you ask me.
- 17,144
- 1,167
But whats up with the nuclear reactors' placement? Too close to people if you ask me.
- 5,637
- 11
But whats up with the nuclear reactors' placement? Too close to people if you ask me.
7.0 is nowhere near an 8.9 quake but still
I've been thinking abou the reactors as well. How come most residential buildings in Japan are designed to endure an earth quake but then there are parts of nuclear reactors that can't? I understand it's a completely different type of building but still. Another thing that I've been thinking about is the placement of the reactors. I understand that they need tons of water for cooling down but do they really have to be built next to the ocean in a country that has been waiting for a tsunami for decades?
Just some thoughts that could probably be answered by correct individuals but still baffle me
- 5,637
- 11
But whats up with the nuclear reactors' placement? Too close to people if you ask me.
7.0 is nowhere near an 8.9 quake but still
I've been thinking abou the reactors as well. How come most residential buildings in Japan are designed to endure an earth quake but then there are parts of nuclear reactors that can't? I understand it's a completely different type of building but still. Another thing that I've been thinking about is the placement of the reactors. I understand that they need tons of water for cooling down but do they really have to be built next to the ocean in a country that has been waiting for a tsunami for decades?
Just some thoughts that could probably be answered by correct individuals but still baffle me
- 4,201
- 141
^Brrraptor could probably answer better, but the potential meltdown may occur not because the building housing the reactor couldn't endure the earthquake, but because they are unable to cool the reactor. Some time after the quake, officials reported that they could no longer cool the reactor using the normal mechanism, which may have been caused by failure in the power grid. So they began diverting sea water to cool the reactor. If they fail to properly cool it down, a meltdown of the inner reactor would occur, which would melt the containment chamber and eventually become exposed to the outside air. This exposure would result in catastrophic radiation release.
Besides, no building can withstand an 8.9 mag earthquake. Nature is still the most powerful force on Earth.
As for your second question, it does have to be built near a large body of water; all that energy has to come from somewhere, threat of tsunami/earthquake or no.
Besides, no building can withstand an 8.9 mag earthquake. Nature is still the most powerful force on Earth.
As for your second question, it does have to be built near a large body of water; all that energy has to come from somewhere, threat of tsunami/earthquake or no.
- 4,201
- 141
^Brrraptor could probably answer better, but the potential meltdown may occur not because the building housing the reactor couldn't endure the earthquake, but because they are unable to cool the reactor. Some time after the quake, officials reported that they could no longer cool the reactor using the normal mechanism, which may have been caused by failure in the power grid. So they began diverting sea water to cool the reactor. If they fail to properly cool it down, a meltdown of the inner reactor would occur, which would melt the containment chamber and eventually become exposed to the outside air. This exposure would result in catastrophic radiation release.
Besides, no building can withstand an 8.9 mag earthquake. Nature is still the most powerful force on Earth.
As for your second question, it does have to be built near a large body of water; all that energy has to come from somewhere, threat of tsunami/earthquake or no.
Besides, no building can withstand an 8.9 mag earthquake. Nature is still the most powerful force on Earth.
As for your second question, it does have to be built near a large body of water; all that energy has to come from somewhere, threat of tsunami/earthquake or no.
xtapolapacetl
Banned
- 6,841
- 126
Didn't they already experience an aftershock that was close to 7? I also read that the big 8.9 quake was upgraded to 9.0 by the Japanese scientists, while the U.S. scientist still classify it as a 8.9.
xtapolapacetl
Banned
- 6,841
- 126
Didn't they already experience an aftershock that was close to 7? I also read that the big 8.9 quake was upgraded to 9.0 by the Japanese scientists, while the U.S. scientist still classify it as a 8.9.
- 4,201
- 141
^Believe so, around 6.8. The next one could be closer to 8, though. They've only said it's supposed to be over 7.
Per MSNBC, Japanese police are estimating the death toll to be in excess of 10,000. No words...
Per MSNBC, Japanese police are estimating the death toll to be in excess of 10,000. No words...
- 4,201
- 141
^Believe so, around 6.8. The next one could be closer to 8, though. They've only said it's supposed to be over 7.
Per MSNBC, Japanese police are estimating the death toll to be in excess of 10,000. No words...
Per MSNBC, Japanese police are estimating the death toll to be in excess of 10,000. No words...
- 1,355
- 11
MEDIA AND GOVT AGENCIES ARE KEEPING THE DEVASTATIONS THAT WILL COME AFTER THIS NUCLEAR EXPLOSION UNDER WRAPS. PEOPLE OF THE WEST COAST ARE INGESTING THIS STUFF AS WE SPEAK AND WILL SOON SEEP ALL ACROSS NORTH AMERICA. R.I.P.
- 1,355
- 11
MEDIA AND GOVT AGENCIES ARE KEEPING THE DEVASTATIONS THAT WILL COME AFTER THIS NUCLEAR EXPLOSION UNDER WRAPS. PEOPLE OF THE WEST COAST ARE INGESTING THIS STUFF AS WE SPEAK AND WILL SOON SEEP ALL ACROSS NORTH AMERICA. R.I.P.
- 29,014
- 4,130
Stop it.
- 29,014
- 4,130
Stop it.
mrbrown
Banned
- 3,558
- 699
WOW FOR REAL?
IM ABOUT TO START TAGGIN ON THE WALLS WARNING PEOPLE
NO JOKE
mrbrown
Banned
- 3,558
- 699
WOW FOR REAL?
IM ABOUT TO START TAGGIN ON THE WALLS WARNING PEOPLE
NO JOKE
- 5,689
- 59
I hope that they manage to cool down other powerplants....
