Jordan Brand Cement Shorts! Yay or Nay? PIC

[r0biiin]

Nay.

 

[merkurposite]

EPIC NAY!!!!

 

[damnneardeadstock]

OD, if they were black with cement accents they might be hot. but an ALL OVER cement print is too damn much.

 

[loveofthegame916]

nay

 

[kickmatic23]

nay

 

[joe billionaire]

not for 70 not for free.

 

[beatlegeuse44]

those are appalling...i wouldn't pay $7 for those, let alone $70.

 

[mjmvp23]

Them look like swimming trunks...pretty soon it's gonna be cement socks and underwear.

 

[bigslamdaddy]

It would be nice with some more elephant print!

It's way too expensive...

 

[mister916]

ew. NAY!

 

[d e beatup]

Looks more like they should go with the ewhite/cement Classic '87s, since they have middle aged wannabe sneakerheadwritten all over them to me.

 

[sikadenyaaverage]

ok thats it why do they just wanna kill the cement print it looks good on SOME things like maybe a shoe(we've seen that) and mayb a shirt but shorts...NAAAYYYYYY

 

[chicken mcmelo]

because its $70, i wouldnt even sit down if i were to ever wear them. IF i did buy them. which i dont think i would because thats 2 much cement

 

[airon0828]

ohhh good gravy those are horrible...

 

[mjrm2384]

If they made a black style that was a swimming suit I might think about buying...but skip $70

 

[mw2889]

I wish they made basketball shorts like that.

 

[aj232kb8]

Originally Posted by 23edge

nay and gay

co-sign

 

[paulmj]

NAAYY! !! ! !! ! !!

 

[s dubl]

I like them, wouldn't buy them though.

 

[compound interest]

hot with a mostly black T and black/cement IIIs

 

[ssgefiestoakagerger]

When you wear them.... you'll have an elephant for a rear end... so NAY !

 

[fenixconnexion]

nayyy and SMH that they would make something like that

 

[gime2purr]

1.To wear as an everyday pair of shorts, ixnay on the ooyay
2.for $70?,ixnay on the ooyay
3.if these were swimming trunks?,Then

 

[teamcharisma69]

meet the NAY

 

[thekillerj23]

Originally Posted by willsndvl

Originally Posted by I Love AF1

$70?

Double

Nay. Those are indeed OD

let me add to that

{