Originally Posted by
Cedric Ceballos 1995 Lakers
Originally Posted by
doyung9
Originally Posted by
Fatal Lightning
Originally Posted by doyung9
If you think today's league is more competitive and/or skillful than the late 80's/90s, I want you to post your birthday as well.
skillful? uhm ..NO, players are more versatile, but there are only a few. no player in the paint has any real skill or moves anymore.
Agreed.
There are no Hakeem's.
Versatile? I guess. But I'd take the 1992-1994 Knicks over any team in the NBA right now. And they weren't even the best any of those 3 years.
im not disregarding your opinion or nothin but what would make you take the 92-94 knicks over any current team? the 93 and 94 knicks were the best of those teams and if they played in todays league half their team would have been ejected over flagrant fouls but aside from that if they let the players play, the 90's knicks wouldn't beat this current heat team, they wouldn't beat the lakers remember if they were playin 90's style ball artest would play the enforcer role, and they wouldn't beat a physical celtics team that plays well together either.
i watched those knicks back then and although i was way younger i remember 93 and i remember 94 pretty well, those knicks were a questionable reggie miller flagrant foul call away from losing to indiana in 1994 and going down as even bigger chokers then they were.
if were going off of any team that didn't win a title in the 90's i would say the 97 jazz were the best team that didn't win a title in the 90's and you can make the argument they'd beat any current team in the league but no way the 90's knicks beat the current lakers, heat, or possibly even last years celtics teams. i got into it with some knick fan on youtube over this argument a while back on some clip he posted of game 7 of the 94 finals and he got mad and resulted to changing the subject after i shut down every argument he had.