- Apr 25, 2005
- 33,428
- 39,205
The only thing these busters need to reimagine is the fact they ever effed up the shape, the elephant print, and the materials on IIIs for the past 20 years in the freaking first place. SMFH
Jordan III REIMAGINED “White Cement” -March 11th 2023
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by Bert.,
- Start date
rbk93
Supporter
- Jun 29, 2016
- 14,384
- 13,758
If FR3s are done right, hype for these will be out the roof.
- May 15, 2003
- 56,926
- 66,302
When I heard they were going to be reimagined aka aged I went to ehhhhhh
How about you give us new sneakers and we age them ourselves
How about you give us new sneakers and we age them ourselves
- Aug 9, 2014
- 12,900
- 28,154
Don’t F this up JB
- Oct 30, 2013
- 728
- 591
The reimagined/vintage look, gives me heartburn. I was really looking forward to these when they were announced yesterday: would’ve loved to have FR3s and these to complete the Nike Air OG set. I don’t need this vintage look ish.
- Aug 9, 2012
- 3,640
- 8,185
If they have good shape and materials and Nike air I’m in for 4-5 pairs. Not gonna complain about the aging or whatever. If it’s the same team that worked on the ow 2 then at least there will be some attention to detail.
- Jul 14, 2003
- 7,860
- 4,910
How about we ‘re-imagine’ correct height, shape, toes, EP, and NA thickness ????
- Jul 29, 2005
- 37,863
- 15,790
Yeah, on second thought, if they give it that vintage look, easy pass for me. I've always hated that gimmick in any iteration.
- Aug 9, 2014
- 12,900
- 28,154
This right here.
If the fake vintage look is done in moderation I’m cool with that.
Most importantly I hate the boxy look, the cliff toe. If the shape is on point that’s crucial
- Feb 21, 2012
- 802
- 1,487
In on these
- Sep 5, 2021
- 6,567
- 12,180
Scale from 1-10, how difficult will these be to get for retail?
…15.
…15.
rbk93
Supporter
- Jun 29, 2016
- 14,384
- 13,758
Didn’t see this. Hopefully it’s not super yellowed.
"re-imagined" "vintage look" ???
- Sep 4, 2006
- 48,736
- 29,099
...in the video on the first page
- Jul 18, 2012
- 2,476
- 3,201
Double up on them
- Aug 19, 2016
- 1,344
- 1,858
Wish it was just a remaster like the am 90s. Wish the aged look design would go away.
But, as long as it ain't see through or patent leather or crinkled throughout, I'll buy as many as possible when they release
But, as long as it ain't see through or patent leather or crinkled throughout, I'll buy as many as possible when they release
- Sep 6, 2015
- 698
- 973
Subbd, we still dont know what ‘reimagined ‘ entails so still skeptical til chicago leaks surface
- Mar 4, 2022
- 501
- 1,173
Facts, that’s one of the best parts of wearing new sneakers, is that they look new “fresh”. I don’t want a pair that looks like it’s 10+ years old the first time I wear them
- Oct 15, 2002
- 2,052
- 2,859
Maybe it's just me but I feel like JB has done a good (not perfect 1:1 of the OG) job with the Jordan 3 since the "Unite" release. Now the Jordan 4's...
- Sep 12, 2013
- 3,144
- 8,293
If it’s just a sail midsole, sail backtab, and eye stays…..with the new mold….MAN MAN MAN! I’m all the way with it!
- Aug 9, 2012
- 3,640
- 8,185
The back tab is gonna yellow in like 2 wears anyway so it’s really not a big deal.
- Mar 27, 2007
- 4,359
- 7,565
These threads just make me hate Nike even more.
rainking
Supporter
- Aug 12, 2016
- 8,348
- 18,293
That’s what I said above, too. I’d like to reimagine nearly all the decisions that have been made regarding the entire Jordan retro line since about 2003. Just make them actually look like a new pair of OGs, and they will look vintage AUTOMATICALLY. I mean, cotdamn, JB.
- Jul 26, 2005
- 1,700
- 645
Bruh idk who started this “AGED LOOK” as a trend who the **** wants yellow *** looking shoes?? JB keeps getting worse & worse
- Feb 3, 2019
- 2,436
- 5,212
I really really liked the JTH white cements, if they had the slim toe they’d be so fire.. I’ll be in on these but wish they were just regular without gimmicks..
