Jordan x KAWS 4 Black “Cyber Monday” 11/27/17 release thread

Far from a simp. But let me guess? You're a pimp or a G or some other lame thing losers call themselves?

And any woman that wouldn't have anything to say about her husband spending $3,000 on a single pair of sneakers is a fool and is likely married to a fool as well.
 It really depends on your situation honestly. 

If you have the disposable income then whats the issue? 
 
Hoping for atleast for these have a draw on Nike, I went on sole links and it says there gonna be on NDC
 
 It really depends on your situation honestly. 

If you have the disposable income then whats the issue? 

Well, to begin with, most people on this planet wouldn't be making a sound financial decision by choosing to spend $3,000 on a pair of shoes. So most people's situations don't jibe with your point.

Second, you can rationalize it however you want but the fact is that you are buying a product that has very limited real value at a markup of 1,000%. Gold has real value. A car has real value. Real estate has real value. Shoes don't. Saying that my wife would express some concerns about me buying a $350 shoe for $3,000 is totally reasonable. And trust me, we have the disposable income and my wife has never said anything about me buying Saint Laurent or Creed colognes or any of the ridiculous stuff I buy. Hell, I spent $500 on KAWS stuff this morning and her response was, "Those are cool." But some $3,000 Jordans? That would be a conversation.
 
17439039_609263429268223_3685859865919488000_n.jpg

Clean AF...i dont stand a chance to buy but they are fresh! NYC wins again...be safe out there at Mercer!
 
Well, to begin with, most people on this planet wouldn't be making a sound financial decision by choosing to spend $3,000 on a pair of shoes. So most people's situations don't jibe with your point.

Second, you can rationalize it however you want but the fact is that you are buying a product that has very limited real value at a markup of 1,000%. Gold has real value. A car has real value. Real estate has real value. Shoes don't. Saying that my wife would express some concerns about me buying a $350 shoe for $3,000 is totally reasonable. And trust me, we have the disposable income and my wife has never said anything about me buying Saint Laurent or Creed colognes or any of the ridiculous stuff I buy. Hell, I spent $500 on KAWS stuff this morning and her response was, "Those are cool." But some $3,000 Jordans? That would be a conversation.


Get you money up.
 
Well, to begin with, most people on this planet wouldn't be making a sound financial decision by choosing to spend $3,000 on a pair of shoes. So most people's situations don't jibe with your point.

Second, you can rationalize it however you want but the fact is that you are buying a product that has very limited real value at a markup of 1,000%. Gold has real value. A car has real value. Real estate has real value. Shoes don't. Saying that my wife would express some concerns about me buying a $350 shoe for $3,000 is totally reasonable. And trust me, we have the disposable income and my wife has never said anything about me buying Saint Laurent or Creed colognes or any of the ridiculous stuff I buy. Hell, I spent $500 on KAWS stuff this morning and her response was, "Those are cool." But some $3,000 Jordans? That would be a conversation.
So shes ok with you buying thousand dollar cologne but would question you for buying a shoe that has longer shelf life lol. 

This is why I log into this site 
laugh.gif


If you got the disposable income she aint saying **** cuz she buying 5K handbags 
wink.gif
 
Nike talk gang out to 21m? Might pull An all nighter and throw some ghost chairs in the streets

Sick of this ****, Nike talk eating
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom