- Sep 28, 2003
- 28,241
- 12,599
so the $300 is official...
Jordan XVII Low Lightning - May 30, 2024
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by therealest1,
- Start date
so the $300 is official...
- Sep 16, 2010
- 5,254
- 7,632
What’s your thoughts on it?
D
Deleted member 246985
Guest
With inflation, isn’t that near original price? (Still high considering what other shoes retail for today)
- Mar 5, 2008
- 12,293
- 12,116
Actually, easy pass.
Will cop when they drop to below $50
Will cop when they drop to below $50
- Apr 18, 2023
- 384
- 621
It was inevitable. Stupid greedy people will keep buying and reselling and Nike will continue increasing the cost of new retail shoes. After all they want in on the resell fun eating away at yalls profits. Its like a hamster spinning its wheel
- Feb 18, 2013
- 18,101
- 8,660
Nike gonna have to make these limited when they did the $250 price on the first 17 retros those sat around for a while.
Annoying as hell but that’s Nike for you
Annoying as hell but that’s Nike for you
- Sep 28, 2003
- 28,241
- 12,599
If it is 90% of the original, as far as the actual shoes go then I can accept that. However, I was expecting $250-270.
- Jul 26, 2014
- 689
- 1,233
Yeah the price with inflation since 2002 is $260. But I don’t know where the extra $40 is coming from. Especially with tech from 2002. No way to legitimize a $300 price tag. I think this is a market test to see what Nike/JB can get away with as far as pricing goes. Right now is the perfect time to test the consumer base by increasing prices with how bad the economy is doing. Everyone needs to let these sit and have either resellers or JB take the loss. This is just anti consumer on every level
Last edited:
- Sep 28, 2003
- 28,241
- 12,599
They might be expecting these to get marked down anyway. $250 is probably the sweet spot where most people will pull the trigger, that is probably what Nike is thinking.
- Apr 18, 2023
- 384
- 621
Theyre not testing anything and get away with it they will. Nike know these will sell out 100% These are another OG shoe MJ wore and will be aimed at the older crowd , they knowing we have the funds to shell out , bad economy or not. Just a matter of getting the logistics ready on how the release will go.
- Sep 28, 2003
- 28,241
- 12,599
What are the Mids with the Suitcase going to be priced at, $400!?
- May 14, 2013
- 3,186
- 7,128
i was disappointed to find out the suitcase was cardboard with foil plating on top 
- Jul 20, 2012
- 4,942
- 6,818
I thought lows were gonna be 250 and highs 300 lol
- Feb 3, 2019
- 2,436
- 5,214
Honestly f*** that suitcase I just want the Wizards mids
- Sep 28, 2003
- 28,241
- 12,599
I wonder if these will become trendy somehow. 90's style New Balance and Asics running shoes are in right now. Who saw that coming?
- Jul 28, 2016
- 139
- 205
This crazy that they pricing them at $300 but I guess I’m crazy as well cuz I’m still snagging these joints. Saving an extra $5 per check for these.
- May 15, 2003
- 57,061
- 66,659
If the ones without the suitcase are going to cost $300, how much are the highs going to cost? It doesn't make sense.
- Dec 23, 2003
- 9,421
- 7,194
I’m expecting those lightnings to hit a pretty good discount
Those shoes have no history to them
$300 is a joke
Those shoes have no history to them
$300 is a joke
- Sep 16, 2010
- 5,254
- 7,632
When the Air Pressure came out as a retro for $300, at least it came with the OG clear case and other small items to “justify” the price. But, $300 for a LOW top with no extra stuff is criminal
- Apr 18, 2023
- 384
- 621
trust me all you all will still pay it. 17 dont release very often
rainking
Supporter
- Aug 12, 2016
- 8,376
- 18,357
Unless they're only making 10K pairs of these or whatever counts as truly limited, these are going to rot. Pricing these at $300 is tone deaf at a time when the cost of everything is through the roof, sneaker resale prices have somewhat crashed, and these shoes aren't like some uber-special Jordan made with the highest-quality materials the sneaker world has ever seen. The eff even supposedly justifies the 17 low as $300?
If they had, say, never retroed the XI or even the WC or BC III and they finally did now and charged $300, it would still be total BS but I could at least see the thinking. But 17 lows as the shoe you choose to really test the limits of retail pricing? Uh, OK, then.
If they had, say, never retroed the XI or even the WC or BC III and they finally did now and charged $300, it would still be total BS but I could at least see the thinking. But 17 lows as the shoe you choose to really test the limits of retail pricing? Uh, OK, then.
- Dec 23, 2003
- 9,421
- 7,194
This is actually a blessing in disguise
Cause if they’re going to test the market with this shoe…
We the market are going to score a great victory against the machine
Cause if they’re going to test the market with this shoe…
We the market are going to score a great victory against the machine
D
Deleted member 246985
Guest
They’re priced at $300 so if/when they go on sale for $200-$250, we’ll think we’re getting a good deal
- Sep 28, 2003
- 28,241
- 12,599
2016 XVII+ Coppers are going for ~300 on StockX in most sizes. I would rather grab a pair of those if I didn't already have them.
- Jul 1, 2008
- 15,031
- 20,572
Damn, didn’t those hit like $80 on sale
Similar threads
