**LA LAKERS THREAD** Sitting on 17! 2023-2024 offseason begins


Los Angeles Lakers
i

Offseason transactions: Russell Westbrook (trade), Austin Reaves (two-way contract) and Joel Ayayi (two-way contract)

What to watch: Their free agents and bargain shopping in free agency

There is work to do this offseason for the Lakers. Despite the addition of a third All-Star in Russell Westbrook, the Lakers have only five players under contract and are $6 million below the luxury tax. Expect the focus to be on signing free agents Talen Horton-Tucker and Alex Caruso. The Lakers can exceed the cap to bring both players back because of Bird rights. The addition of Westbrook likely rules out a return of point guard Dennis Schroder. However, the Lakers can try to bolster their bench by exploring sign-and-trade options with Schroder. The Lakers are not allowed to bring back players under contract in a trade, but that doesn't apply to free agents acquired in a trade.

What else to watch for the L.A. Lakers

  • What is the pecking order in free agency? Half the players on the roster are free agents
  • What is the final cost of this roster?
Available exceptions: $5.9 million and veterans minimum

Note: The $143 million hard cap gets triggered if the Lakers use more than $5.9 million of their midlevel exception or they acquire a player in a sign-and-trade.

Room under the tax: $6.3 million

Room under the hard cap: $12.6 million

Lakers' projected depth chart
[TABLE]
[TR]
[TH]PG[/TH][TH]SG[/TH][TH]SF[/TH][TH]PF[/TH][TH]C[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]R. Westbrook[/TD][TD]A. Reaves2[/TD][TD]L. James[/TD][TD]A. Davis[/TD][TD]M. Gasol[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[TD]J. Ayayi2[/TD][TD]A. McKinnie1[/TD][TD][/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]1= Partial/non-guaranteed[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]2= Two-way[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Players under contract: 5

Two-way contracts: 2

Team needs

  • Starting shooting guard
  • Bench depth at every position
Extension-eligible: Alfonzo McKinnie and Russell Westbrook

Free-agent status

 
DLF DLF , is the DS market actually looking so dry that we'll actually have to keep him? Like not S&T, but S&...play?

-foe
 
Back
Top Bottom