- Oct 28, 2013
- 42,742
- 178,556
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'd be a little queasy giving up a future first for Bogdanovic, but he'd be a great fit as a shooter. You can sort of talk me into Kuz too.What are you hoping for?
Depends on protections but yes. If we were all about cap space and not giving up picks and all we end up with is hogs for a first and no cap space I’d be conflictedI'd be a little queasy giving up a future first for Bogdanovic, but he'd be a great fit as a shooter. You can sort of talk me into Kuz too.
I'd be a little queasy giving up a future first for Bogdanovic, but he'd be a great fit as a shooter. You can sort of talk me into Kuz too.
Depends on protections but yes. If we were all about cap space and not giving up picks and all we end up with is hogs for a first and no cap space I’d be conflicted
“Would significantly reduce the amount” is right. We’d go from 33 mill to spend to just a tax payer mid level (7mill and vet mins)You think Bev/Nunn could get Kuz without giving up a first? That would be a steal and Washington would be doing LA a huge favor I really like Bogs too but I am 100% with you on holding on to that pic
This is a good point. He would significantly reduce the amount we had to spend but it would be the “all-in” move for at least this year that everyone wants
Nah, it would definitely require a first to get Kuz. Washington is one of the few teams that works with Pelinka, so maybe there's a chance something gets worked out if they continue to nosedive.You think Bev/Nunn could get Kuz without giving up a first? That would be a steal and Washington would be doing LA a huge favor I really like Bogs too but I am 100% with you on holding on to that pic
This is what clown *** Jeanie and Pelinka wanted. To continue to kick the can, let AD/Bron get hurt/empty their tanks and punt the season.
Of course.
Back to back seasons over before new years.
Didn't know you were a fan tbhBIG LEEMELONE you are right - I am not a player nor employee for the Los Angeles Lakers. I should have used “they”. I will be more cognizant of my pronoun usage in the future.
The nuclear option: