- Mar 20, 2017
- 24,025
- 31,496
He’sNow I’m wondering was the injury when he planted his foot prior to jumping or the mild mid-air ankle sprain? Maybe tore something when he planted? Weird
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He’sNow I’m wondering was the injury when he planted his foot prior to jumping or the mild mid-air ankle sprain? Maybe tore something when he planted? Weird
some def got more dawg in emI know Latinas with more heart than AD
The idea is fine in theory, but absolutely no to Beal and LaVine.Let’s talk about the Lakers first, since they’ve been so prominent in seeking out deals that parlay fungible expiring contracts and their first-round picks in 2027 and/or 2029 into help for the present moment. Davis’ injury strikes me as yet another data point that the Lakers absolutely, positively should not throw any draft capital at trying to salvage this season and let it circle the drain on its own.
While the Lakers have no tanking incentive due to a pick swap with New Orleans from the Davis trade, they also don’t need to burn through future picks just so they can finish ninth instead of 12th. Realistically, there is no trade that can replace Davis, and they weren’t exactly burning through the league with him.
While I’m sure the Lakers can talk themselves into puncher’s-chance scenarios if they can get into the Play-In healthy and add pieces next to Davis and LeBron James, history says that teams outside the top three seeds have little chance of making the NBA Finals. The Lakers, at this point, have virtually no chance of a top three seed. Most projection systems aren’t even bullish about their chances of making the Play-In.
What the Lakers could do, on the other hand, is set up a trade to build their team for next year … and if it incidentally pushes them forward this year too, that’s fine. Trading for players under contract beyond this season, in particular, should be the focus of any deal involving the future picks.
I’m immediately drawn, for instance, to the idea of the Lakers trading Russell Westbrook and at least one of the picks to Washington for Bradley Beal. Beal is one of the few star players who can easily fit in as a third option next to James and Davis yet is good enough to take over as the lead operator when James is off the court. Moving him to L.A. also seems like one of the few options that would save Washington from a disastrous no-trade clause in Beal’s generous five-year, $251 million deal. It would let the Wizards re-sign Kyle Kuzma without going into the luxury tax and likely leave enough cap room to ink another starter-caliber player too.
If Beal isn’t available because the Wizards are all-in for the eight seed for a 43rd consecutive year, other choices represent similar versions of this — the Bulls’ Zach LaVine, for instance. The larger point is that the Lakers don’t have to play this card at all come February and shouldn’t feel pressure to do so just to salvage a season that may not be salvageable.
Raw Dawgsome def got more dawg in em
I don’t agree with “models suggest lakers will barely make the play in if healthy” or “they are virtually out of the running for a top 3 seed”Hollinger:
The idea is fine in theory, but absolutely no to Beal and LaVine.
Hollinger:
The idea is fine in theory, but absolutely no to Beal and LaVine.
Both of their contracts suck. Don't need a chucking $40M guard next to AD and Bron.John Hollinger sees the vision Why no to Beal and LaVine? Had no idea Zach is having such a cheeks season by his standards
Both aren’t the sameBoth of their contracts suck. Don't need a chucking $40M guard next to AD and Bron.
We're stuck in the LeBron, superteam era mindset of "get star players and everything else will figure itself out". This is an outdated mindset from a decade ago and most good teams have moved on. None of the top teams in the league are superstar top heavy anymore.
This sounds ridiculousWith the way this scouting dept ID's talent, I look forward to when we have a bunch of picks again and no stars to cater too, and we grow a squad full of kids again that will bring 1-2 stars in organically instead of forcibly. Need the next wave to attract Luka and Zion to team up.
You mean like 2016?This sounds ridiculous
And valid.
At time same time.
-foe
No Bron No AD No AR No Book No watchNo Bron or AR tonight.
No Book for the Suns.