cb94
Banned
- 1,192
- 13
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2004
Today in my philosophy class we discussed the morality of abortion and the most important thing I realized is that the difference between the opposition toabortion and those that feel abortion is at least somewhat permissible is the fact that only certain people see the issue as a moral one in the first place.For many people, there is no moral compass for this sort of thing. The logos of abortion takes precedence over the ethos.And that makes sense to me because I'm a rational person. So I'm left to believe abortion isn't "right" per say, but under certaincalculated conditions, I can certainly see how people come to the decision to have an abortion, and I think it's unfair to not allow people the right toexercise logic over emotion in defense of someone that hasn't began "relevant life" yet. I'm pro-life in the sense that I value theimportance of the relevant lives in question, those being the ones of the potential mother and father. They already exist. They havehistories, futures, and realities that should be valued and accounted for. I'm pro choice in that I feel it makes perfect sense for awoman and a man to choose to protect what they have already established in their lives by not allowing something hypothetical, or rather undeveloped, to come to fruition and take precedence over circumstances that are already in place… Forcing people to count theirchickens before they hatch is impractical and unnatural.