- 17,236
- 1,943
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2006
I get it, I do. But do you really wanna have one of your key players foul out when it's crucial?An issue that bothers me is how Jackson keeps his players in even when they're in foul trouble...We were lucky Klay wasn't "needed" since he fouled out.
It's a habitual problem and I wish he wouldn't hesitate to take out the players.
i dont think jackson has the luxury of subbing out a player like Klay/iggy. granted barnes has improved his play, there's a significant drop off between klay/iggy and anyone else coming off the bench on both ends of the court.
A hypothetical situation: Down 3, 10 seconds left, and Klay is fouled out, who shoots if Curry if locked up? I just think that Jackson can spare a few minutes till the 2nd half ends.
Last edited: