LOL, Governor of NY proposes Tax on Downloading Porn for the state of NY

Messages
30,777
Reaction score
5,779
[h1]Paterson tax would include porn[/h1]THE ASSOCIATED PRESS February 16, 2009
ALBANY - Talk of a New York tax increase just got a little, er, hotter.

It turns out that Gov. David A. Paterson's proposal on downloads of music and software would also apply to downloading pornography, an element unnoticed in the public debate so far.

The state Division of Budget confirmed that the tax would apply to skin flicks, whether they are downloaded online or purchased through pay-per-view on television.

"By taxing it you're legitimizing it," said Michael Long, chairman of the New York Conservative Party. "You're sending a message to the children, you're sending a message to the teenagers, if you're taxing it - how can it be wrong? I don't know how you can sink much deeper."
Because of recent court decisions over the relatively new area of taxing Internet transactions, the salestax would apply only to pornographers who are located in the state. It's a break for out-of-state Web sites that wouldn't have to collect from NewYorkers.

It's difficult to tally how much people spend for online porn, but TopTenREVIEWS.com, a site reviewing products and ranking their quality, performance andrevenue, says the industry brought in $2.84 billion in 2006. The cable, pay-per-view and phone sex industries brought in $2.19 billion that year, the sitesays.

Paterson's tax also applies to downloads of music and movies, so this government action on pornography isn't likely to face the same legal challengesover indecency and freedom of speech as past measures because the tax isn't specifically targeting content.

The "iPod tax" would tax the sale of downloaded music and other digitally delivered entertainment services by 4 percent.

"This is simply bringing the tax code in line with technology," said Matt Anderson, a spokesman for the Division ofBudget. "Regardless of whether or not an item is purchased at a brick-and-mortar store or online, it would be treated consistently.
 
I agree with the premise that the Governor of NY State would be legitimizing porn by introducing this tax. I know times are tough, but that's a bad PR movefor a Governor.

Paterson's been an ineffectual and shortsighted (no pun intended) Governor with a lot of his ideas including this one.
 
Originally Posted by N3FF 3000

Figures, he can't watch it. Why not make it worse for those that do?

laugh.gif
word was thinkin the same thing. Just mad that he cant see RoxyReynolds work it like a champ.
 
OWL TROUTWIG wrote:

Paterson's been an ineffectual and shortsighted (no pun intended) Governor with a lot of his ideas including this one.
i agree, lately he's been
grin.gif
 
Well, I wouldn't want to be the state Rep/Senator who voted against taxing porn. I think it'd be pretty easy for an opponent to attack a person takingthat position on moral grounds.
 
He's for a movie ticket tax. I signed the petition at the movies last weekend. It would implement a $3 tax on tickets.
 
Originally Posted by RellNye

He's for a movie ticket tax. I signed the petition at the movies last weekend. It would implement a $3 tax on tickets.
Damn, dude has it in for people that can see.
 
He should put a tax on adulterous, cocaine sniffing politicians that look like Sesame Street Characters.

Patterson is a clown.

Don't watch Porn anymore so I could care less but this is unconstitutional and idiotic, the whole download tax.
 
Originally Posted by RellNye

He's for a movie ticket tax. I signed the petition at the movies last weekend. It would implement a $3 tax on tickets.


$3 Tax! Thats insane. A petition for Impeaching him would sound even better.
 
Back
Top Bottom