MALAYSIA LOSES CONTACT WITH PLANE CARRYING 239

This is on some all time ridiculous theory that would never actually go unnoticed steez but here's a breakdown anyways...

http://www.snopes.com/politics/conspiracy/malaysiapatent.asp
 Claim:    Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 was made to disappear so one party could gain control of a multiply-owned patent. 
 
content-divider.gif

red.gif
FALSE
content-divider.gif


Example:    [Collected via e-mail, March 2014]  
 
This was posted on facebook in a discussion of the missing Malaysia Airlines Flight: 

------------------------------------------------- 

Here's what you all need to know. Spread this information everywhere: 

Four days after the missing flight MH370 a patent is approved by the Patent Office 

4 of the 5 Patent holders are Chinese employees of Freescale Semiconductor of Austin TX. 

Patent is divided up on 20% increments to 5 holders: 

Peidong Wang, Suzhou, China, (20%) 
Zhijun Chen, Suzhou, China, (20%) 
Zhihong Cheng, Suzhou, China, (20%) 
Li Ying, Suzhou, China, (20%) 
Freescale Semiconductor (20%) 

If a patent holder dies, then the remaining holders equally share the dividends of the deceased if not disputed in a will. 

If 4 of the 5 dies, then the remaining 1 Patent holder gets 100% of the wealth of the patent. 

That remaining live Patent holder is Freescale Semiconductor. 

Who owns Freescale Semiconductor? 

Jacob Rothschild through Blackstone (what an interesting name for a company) who owns Freescale. 

Here is your motive for the missing plane. As all 4 Chinese members of the Patent were passengers on the missing plane, and that patent was the breakthrough. We have entered the future proper, and four men was just murdered so that the last, still living member can keep this for himself to either hide or profit from.

Origins:    Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 disappeared over the South China Sea on 8 March2014 with 239 persons  (227 passengers  and 12 crew  members) aboard. Several days later, a conspiracy theory was floated on the Internet that four of the passengers on that flight were all co-holders  of a recently issued, highly valuable patent and the disappearance of Flight 370  was engineered to eliminate them so that remainingco-holder  of the patent could reap all the royalties from it for himself. 

The improbabilities of such a theory are numerous. For starters, it's not clear the four men referenced as patent co-holders actually were on Flight 370,  as their names (as rendered above) don't 
 
appear on the flight manifest. (It's possible that the seeming absence of some matching names from the manifest could be due to slight differences in the transliterations of those persons' names from Chinese to English, however.) 

Moreover, the patent  in question is dated 11 March  2014 and involves a "system for optimizing number of dies produced on a wafer." That doesn't sound like a highly valuable, "breakthrough" type of patent that would prompt the murder of four people (much less the death of 235 other innocent parties) in order to gain exclusive control of it. It looks to be a patent for a procedure that moderately improves the efficiency of a particular manufacturing process, not something with a huge market base and a vast potential for profit. 

Additionally, the men listed are not actually the patent holders: they're the inventors/applicants, with the patent itself having been assigned to Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., of Austin, Texas. Presumably Freescale Semiconductor is their employer, and it's typical that engineers working in the employ of companies are required by the terms of their employment to assign ownership of their discoveries and inventions to their employers (and thus usually do not receive royalties from any resulting patents). 

It's also not a given that if all but one of the co-holders  of a patent dies, "then the remaining one patent holder gets 100% of the wealth of the patent" as if a patent were some form of tontine to be awarded to the last man standing. Unless prior arrangements had been made in that regard, the share of the patent held by the deceased may pass to his heirs or estate through the usual inheritance process. 

Finally, although the Rothschild name may be a talisman for many conspiracy theorists, it isn't true that Jacob Rothschild "owns" Freescale Semiconductor. Freescale is a public company whose stock  is held, in part, by 152 different  institutional shareholders. The Blackstone Group, at which Jacob Rothschild  serves as a member of the company's International Advisory Board, is one of the largest of those institutional holders (with over 196 million  shares), but the Carlyle Group and TPG Group Holdings both own a number of Freescale shares equal to that held by Blackstone. 

Last updated:    13 March 2014 
 
Last edited:
 
Yea bit with a car i can somewhat control my fate, if your in a plane RIP, nothing you can do
you dont have much control over other cars that can hit you.

and just because you're in "control" doesn't mean you're not going to make a mistake.

almost always a series of things have to happen in order for a plane to crash.

in a car it's just one simple split second mistake that usually humans dont have quick enough reflexes to correct

that sense of "control" is just a false sense of security

the odds between the two are hugely different for a reason...

 
 
Last edited:
India military is now saying there was no way it flew over India.

yea i would think that one of those countries would've caught the plane if it entered its airspace, communication or not. and from what i kno so far ( 8o ) no country is saying the plane entered its airspace before it disappeared....


also with air france, didn't they find wreckage/debris INITIALLY not long after crash but the exact location of the plane wasn't found till a 18 months later?
 
I think it was stolen.

Imagine if someone landed this safely, made it into a giant dirty bomb and used it as a weapon..

What if they loaded it with 400 militants all strapped with RPGs and fully autos. They bring it down somewhere like Central Park and all the militants scatter and turn the surrounding areas into a war zone. Also, all of them are strapped with a bomb, so if they get cornered or in trouble, they can push the button...

If the pings that the engines send could be disabled, they could be very dangerous, because them they wouldn't even know it was flying..

It's crazy. They could just dive bomb into the Taj Mahal..
What in Christ's name did I just read? 
laugh.gif
 
I think it was stolen.

Imagine if someone landed this safely, made it into a giant dirty bomb and used it as a weapon..

What if they loaded it with 400 militants all strapped with RPGs and fully autos. They bring it down somewhere like Central Park and all the militants scatter and turn the surrounding areas into a war zone. Also, all of them are strapped with a bomb, so if they get cornered or in trouble, they can push the button...

If the pings that the engines send could be disabled, they could be very dangerous, because them they wouldn't even know it was flying..

It's crazy. They could just dive bomb into the Taj Mahal..
username to post correlation 
pimp.gif
 
So that map...it would take 5 hours to get from the point where the plane is to the outer blue edge?

I mean, it takes like 6 hours to get from NY to Cali so...I dont get the radius being that far.
 
My guess is the 2 people that stole the passports hi-jacked the plane (Maybe thats why the altitude went down then up because of a struggle?) and it was landed somewhere with the people on board kept as hostages or something, to where they plan on using the plan as an attack some how.

just a thought
 
in this day and time 2 people are not hijacking a plane alone.... 2 hijackers vs 249 passenegers...come on
 
 
in this day and time 2 people are not hijacking a plane alone.... 2 hijackers vs 249 passenegers...come on
maybe all the passengers are terrorists and figured out a way to all get on the same flight so that they could commanndeer a plane without struggling.
 
 
you dont have much control over other cars that can hit you.

and just because you're in "control" doesn't mean you're not going to make a mistake.

almost always a series of things have to happen in order for a plane to crash.

in a car it's just one simple split second mistake that usually humans dont have quick enough reflexes to correct

that sense of "control" is just a false sense of security

the odds between the two are hugely different for a reason...

 
what happens if a plane crashes....instant death right?

car crashes are less likely to instantly kill u. plus u have seatbelts, air bags, and the ability to lessen the impact by maneuvering, slamming brakes,etc. it all depends on the speed as well, going 45 miles in a car vs the minimum speed in a plane is a helluva difference
 
Theres statistics for a reason.

You have no control when you're in a plane, at the same time you have no control over other drivers. Plus you drive a lot more so...

Anyways, thats an entirely different topic.
 
Back
Top Bottom