- 8,139
- 88
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2005
Jugular.Originally Posted by Kiddin Like Jason
Meanwhile, a scout offered this about Brett Wallace: "He can hit but he throws like a girl. They acquired a DH - I think he might be Jack Cust Jr. with fewer Ks.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Jugular.Originally Posted by Kiddin Like Jason
Meanwhile, a scout offered this about Brett Wallace: "He can hit but he throws like a girl. They acquired a DH - I think he might be Jack Cust Jr. with fewer Ks.
I agree.Originally Posted by Osh Kosh Bosh
JP should be shot and killed if he takes back JA Happ.
If Prince Feilder can stick at first, and Kyle Blanks can play LF, I don't see why Brett Wallace can't man first, plus scouts have said despite his size he is very athletic at 3rd...
Fielder's ability to hit at the Major League level made him stick at first; we still have to see that from Wallace.
As for Blanks, let's give it some time before we anoint him an a capable left fielder.
Originally Posted by JaysForDays
who wants Dunn/Willingham/Nick Johnson?
If I say JP in the street I would punch him in the face I swear.
What is wrong with the Phillies GM? He is balking on JA Happ? Has he lost his danm mind?Originally Posted by Nowitness41Dirk
I've seen places calling that the equivalent of Justin Smoak, Feliz/Perez, and Tommy Hunter/Scott Feldman...
Word. The A's know how to develop pitching, not hitting. K. Suzuki is the only dude I can think of that developed alright. But that wasmore in spite of the A's not because of them.Originally Posted by Th3RealF0lkBlu3s
I do not trust the A's to handle Wallace properly.
I wish they would find a way to steal away Boston's hitting coach, or even Texas' hitting coach. In Oakland, we ruin hitters.
What?Originally Posted by Smokey1212
Word. The A's know how to develop pitching, not hitting. K. Suzuki is the only dude I can think of that developed alright. But that was more in spite of the A's not because of them.Originally Posted by Th3RealF0lkBlu3s
I do not trust the A's to handle Wallace properly.
I wish they would find a way to steal away Boston's hitting coach, or even Texas' hitting coach. In Oakland, we ruin hitters.
• The Angels did indeed make a run at Halladay, offering Jered Weaver(notes) plus the Blue Jays' pick of outfield or infield prospects, including Brandon Wood(notes), but it wasn't enough. Milwaukee's position on trades, as articulated by owner Mark Attanasio is "aggressive but not stupid."
As far as putting all that talent together? I think it has VERY LITTLE to do with Nolan's presence... I mean, he's been here 18 months...The Rangers had Holland, Feliz, Perez, Beavan, Main, Font, and the vast majority of those guys in hand before Nolan was hired or immediately after, before hereally took any kind of hands on approach with the organization... I think a lot of it has to do with the Rangers finally hiring a General Manager (Daniels)that could get through to Tom Hicks that this team genuinely needed a complete overhaul, that building from within and developing your own talent was the wayto go and that's where quite a bit of your cash assets needed to be budgeted... You're finally seeing the Rangers go well over slot value in the draft,they're spending tons of money in the International markets, and they're spending tons of cash on development... That's got very little to do withNolan Ryan, as it was already a plan that was in place and rolling before he got here...Originally Posted by briannnnn
^^ Has the abundance of pitching prospects (top ones at that) in the Rangers system have anything to do with Nolan Ryan having more of a role in their development? Just asking out of curiosity...