shatterkneesinc
Banned
- 22,524
- 2,383
i think once u reach that 3+ ring realm, the argument diminishes
u start looking at mvps, all nba teams, asg
u start looking at mvps, all nba teams, asg
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican
Originally Posted by Deuce King
I wouldn't just forget them per se, cause he did play a role in getting those 3 rings. For me, when discussing Kobe's legacy my opening statement unlike the rest of you dudes wouldn't be "Kobe has 5 rings". Reason being is because Kobe was not the MAIN factor for 3 of the rings he has. It's like you guys are tyring to maximize his legacy in a sense by trying to pull the wool over folks eyes into saying Kobe's role in getting his first 3 rings was larger than what it truly was. Like I said before, for more than half of the rings Kobe has, he was never the Finals MVP, never the regular season MVP and wasn't the leading scorer for any of his first 3 championships...........FACT.
So you start off saying you wouldn't say to forget them, but by the end of your paragraph you essentially say to forget them. Right. Some battles aren't worth the keystrokes. You got it dude. You really do.
So how many rings does everybody have then? We have to subtract rings now unless you were the best player of the team?
Can you read kind sir?? Where did I say or suggest we have to subtract rings from players. I said any Kobe lovers opening statement when talking about Kobe's legacy to me shouldn't be "Kobe has 5 rings" because the statement suggests or implies that he was the leader or the main reason he has 5 championships rings. However for the people that watched those games and actually watch that championship run we know better, and more importantly deep down I believe alot of you Kobe lovers know better as well. You guys have just been doing a good job of trying to fool other people and doing a great job of fooling yourselves.
Dude was getting 28 a game, 2nd team all nba for title 2, all nba for title 3, 5th in the MVP voting, and yet he can't count these rings on his resume cuz Shaq was there.
We're giving credit or highlighting being 5th in MVP voting now........ You Kobe lovers, what will you dudes think of next.
FACT: BOTH SHAQ AND DUNCAN RANK HIGHER THAN KOBE. BOTH 4 RINGS AND 3 FINALS MVP'S
KOBE WITH 5 RINGS BUT ONLY 2 FINALS MVP.
FINALS MVP EMPHASIZES MORE THAN THE AMOUNT OF RINGS WHEN IT COMES TO ANALYZING THE PERSONAL ACCOLADES.
SIMPLE *+++
"My man"
Btw the 3rd title they both spazzed..
Shaq averaged 36ppg... Kobe averaged 26.8 PPG..
I hear ya champ, and not to take credit away from Kobe cause he definitely did his thing, but as you clearly illustrated Shaq was #1 and Kobe was a distant 2nd.
Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican
Originally Posted by Deuce King
I wouldn't just forget them per se, cause he did play a role in getting those 3 rings. For me, when discussing Kobe's legacy my opening statement unlike the rest of you dudes wouldn't be "Kobe has 5 rings". Reason being is because Kobe was not the MAIN factor for 3 of the rings he has. It's like you guys are tyring to maximize his legacy in a sense by trying to pull the wool over folks eyes into saying Kobe's role in getting his first 3 rings was larger than what it truly was. Like I said before, for more than half of the rings Kobe has, he was never the Finals MVP, never the regular season MVP and wasn't the leading scorer for any of his first 3 championships...........FACT.
So you start off saying you wouldn't say to forget them, but by the end of your paragraph you essentially say to forget them. Right. Some battles aren't worth the keystrokes. You got it dude. You really do.
So how many rings does everybody have then? We have to subtract rings now unless you were the best player of the team?
Can you read kind sir?? Where did I say or suggest we have to subtract rings from players. I said any Kobe lovers opening statement when talking about Kobe's legacy to me shouldn't be "Kobe has 5 rings" because the statement suggests or implies that he was the leader or the main reason he has 5 championships rings. However for the people that watched those games and actually watch that championship run we know better, and more importantly deep down I believe alot of you Kobe lovers know better as well. You guys have just been doing a good job of trying to fool other people and doing a great job of fooling yourselves.
Dude was getting 28 a game, 2nd team all nba for title 2, all nba for title 3, 5th in the MVP voting, and yet he can't count these rings on his resume cuz Shaq was there.
We're giving credit or highlighting being 5th in MVP voting now........ You Kobe lovers, what will you dudes think of next.
FACT: BOTH SHAQ AND DUNCAN RANK HIGHER THAN KOBE. BOTH 4 RINGS AND 3 FINALS MVP'S
KOBE WITH 5 RINGS BUT ONLY 2 FINALS MVP.
FINALS MVP EMPHASIZES MORE THAN THE AMOUNT OF RINGS WHEN IT COMES TO ANALYZING THE PERSONAL ACCOLADES.
SIMPLE *+++
"My man"
Btw the 3rd title they both spazzed..
Shaq averaged 36ppg... Kobe averaged 26.8 PPG..
I hear ya champ, and not to take credit away from Kobe cause he definitely did his thing, but as you clearly illustrated Shaq was #1 and Kobe was a distant 2nd.
My man.Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican
I mean how can I counteract such an off-the wall claim. Of course I have nothing to say other than I don't understand how you can possibly use that approach when looking at someone's resume.
And can you please stop with the name calling? We are all adults here, because someone is making a point in favor of a player they don't have to be considered a Kobe Lover. Please stop man. It diminishes the integrity of the conversation (which is very good).
But you KEEP saying NOT to take credit away from Kobe but.............Almost as saying, "No disrespect but you are stupid." You are doing what you are saying you aren't and I don't think you are seeing it.
If you want to not credit Kobe for those rings, say it. Stop beating around the bush.
My man.Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican
I mean how can I counteract such an off-the wall claim. Of course I have nothing to say other than I don't understand how you can possibly use that approach when looking at someone's resume.
And can you please stop with the name calling? We are all adults here, because someone is making a point in favor of a player they don't have to be considered a Kobe Lover. Please stop man. It diminishes the integrity of the conversation (which is very good).
But you KEEP saying NOT to take credit away from Kobe but.............Almost as saying, "No disrespect but you are stupid." You are doing what you are saying you aren't and I don't think you are seeing it.
If you want to not credit Kobe for those rings, say it. Stop beating around the bush.
Originally Posted by toine2983
Great write up on LeBron Allen.
Originally Posted by toine2983
Great write up on LeBron Allen.
JapanAir21:
I want to talk about Kidd too.
10 years from now, we might look back on this Playoff run and say, "Ehh, Kidd was just along for the ride like Gary Payton was."
No, definitely not. Kidd didn't have the points this year to make him stand out, and he didn't have double-digit dimes every game, but what he did was what every single person in the world, including most Mavericks fans, myself included, though he lost. His biggest value to this team was as a defender. Turning back the clock, Kidd faced superstars ranging from Roy, Russell Westbrook, Kobe, Durant, Wade, and even LeBron. Did he ever shut down these guys for complete games? No, not really, but he got all of these guys out of their groove at some time in the game.
During this run, he wouldn't give up. He wouldn't ever admit defeat and let his man go off. Now I won't get blinded by the championship and say he was the primary defender on Kobe, Westbrook, Durant, Wade and Lebron ALL the time. He wasn't, it was a team effort with help from DeShawn Stevenson and Shawn Marion. But, with that said, when it mattered most, Kidd was getting the picks, he was the guy staying in front of some of the fastest guys in the L, he was staying in front of one of the strongest men in the L like LeBron, he was doing all he could in crunch time to make sure that these guys couldn't get off.
His perseverance is what allowed us to come back so many games. I don't know the number exactly, but the Mavericks came back from double-digit deficits countless times during these Playoffs. It was a run that was magical, one-of-a-kind, and how did they all begin? With stops on the defensive end. We tightened up, switched to the zone, did whatever we could, and Jason Kidd was right there at the forefront to lead us. You would have told me prior to the Playoffs that Jason Kidd was our best crunch-time defender I would've giggled, and the rest of the basketball world would have called you an idiot. But you know what? In the 2011 NBA Playoffs? He sure as hell did.
With all this said, you have to approach the question again of where does he belong? Among all the other players in the League, I find it hard to rank PGs unless their in their own class. Magic is obviously the one exception, but it's hard for me personally to put a label on John Stockton and say where he ranks all-time compared to other greats like Hakeem, Kareem, or Kobe. Obviously below all of them, but it's just a way to show how hard it is to compare PGs to every other position. In regards to Jason Kidd and where he ranks among other PGs? It's really hard for me to put him above guys like Stockton, O, and Isiah, but he's right there. He has the leadership of Isiah Thomas. He has the versatility of the Big O, and he has the longevity of John Stockton. The NBA will lose a great talent when this man retires. Kidd never had the scoring capacity that other great PGs had, and that's what will keep him from surpassing O and Isiah, but, I think being right there with them, in a 3A, 3B, 3C kind of ranking, isn't out of the question at all. Jason Kidd is THE role model of those who can persevere. Jason Kidd was one of the first players to really succeed after having microfracture surgery.
He's an old man, but this just proves that an old dog can learn new tricks (Or in this case, use tricks once lost).
As far as ranking goes, for me... FOR ME... it's Magic, then Kidd. Yes, I'm someone who uses the championships of central figures as a huge credit to that individual. So the fact that Stockton and Nash don't have one and now Kidd does, yes, that means something to me (actually, Nash hasn't even BEEN in the Finals, but that's for another discussion).
Big O? Yes, era counts for me, too. The game is harder today.
Isiah? This one just boils down to personal preference. No, Kidd is nowhere near the scorer Isiah was, and Kidd has never been a prolific scorer... BUT THAT'S WHAT I WANT FROM MY PG. That's EXACTLY what I want! I want a PG who thinks PASS FIRST... and if that isn't gonna work... FIND ANOTHER PASS... and if that isn't gonna work... SCORE.
Jason Kidd is the best 'basketball quarterback' since Magic, in my opinion. Magic WAS a better scorer, obviously, but that's why he COLLECTED championships (well, that and the fact that he played w/ 2 other Finals MVPs, and Kidd just now played w/ his 1st).
AND HOW DID YOU NOT MENTION TRIPLE DOUBLES?! People throwing out Big O and Magic in this Kidd discussion... and there are your 3 all time triple double leaders. Playoffs? It's Magic on top and Kidd in 2nd.
My main thing about having Magic and Kidd as 1-2 on my list is how they did what they did, which was completely opposite.
- Magic was fun, but highly competitive. He KNEW basketball, and loved to keep everyone on the team involved. He was flashy, smiling, competitive, and knew how to put the ball in the basket; very versatile.
- Kidd, on the other hand, isn't versatile at all. If he's on the floor, he's at the 1. Not the 2 or 3 or 3, like Magic sometimes did. He's the PG, period. There's a famous quote "Do one thing, and do it well", and that's Kidd. He's not flashy; he has thrown some crazy passes in his day, but I'd bet everything that if we were in his head, we'd see that the reason he threw that pass would be because he honestly thought that was the best thing to do right then, like he didn't even think about it. He's very calm and poised, hardly ever frowning or smiling. He knows basketball; he sees passing lanes to HIT on the offensive end and EXPLOIT on the defensive end better than anyone since Magic (and better than Magic on the defensive end), and he knows the trends of both his players and his defenders better than anyone (and again, better than Magic when it comes to tracking stats of his opponents).
Even in the Olympics, when he was on the court, it was all business. He'd throw a few lobs to people that need them, but for the most part, it was all business now, fun and celebration when we're done; no, not done with the game, but the tournament.
And speaking of the Olympics, he never lost an international game as a professional. Not in the Olympics, not in qualifying tournaments, never; 46-0.
1999 Qualifying tourney for the 2000 Syndney gamess: 10-0
2000 Olympics: 8-0
2002 World Championship: injured
2003 FIBA qualifying tourney for 2004 Athens games: 10-0
2004 Olympics: injured
2007 FIBA Americas Championship: 10-0
2008 Olympics: 8-0
He has 3 gold medals from qualifying tournaments, and 2 gold from Olympics.