- 11,980
- 18
In the words of Kobe himself, that was one giant bikram yoga stretch right there CP
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Only one problem, SA won not because they were better, but because LA was flat out exhausted
go some where with that homer crap
Only one problem, SA won not because they were better, but because LA was flat out exhausted
go some where with that homer crap
go some where with that homer crapOriginally Posted by Bigmike23
thats a post full of stuff more about the spurs been overrated then it is TD
.Only one problem, SA won not because they were better, but because LA was flat out exhausted
Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican
It doesn't really matter WHY someone won a ring, it is a damn ring. The record books won't say that Lakers was tired so that is why Spurs won. I mean I could see if they only won 1 time then maybe you would have an argument (in your own mind maybe). So can we say the same thing about the Lakers? They only won rings because the Spurs were tired?
go some where with that homer crapOriginally Posted by Bigmike23
thats a post full of stuff more about the spurs been overrated then it is TD
.Only one problem, SA won not because they were better, but because LA was flat out exhausted
Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican
It doesn't really matter WHY someone won a ring, it is a damn ring. The record books won't say that Lakers was tired so that is why Spurs won. I mean I could see if they only won 1 time then maybe you would have an argument (in your own mind maybe). So can we say the same thing about the Lakers? They only won rings because the Spurs were tired?
No no, absolutely he could have gotten a ring elsewhere, OR, he could have been wasted to death, ala Garnett.Originally Posted by Bigmike23
you really think a great player like Duncan doesnt get a ring some how? that spurs team was built around him. you dont think boston would do the same?
u touched on about all those PF tht had more talent then him. IMO that is what made him so great. he didnt have all the talent in the world but would work on his game summer after summer and add stuff to it. you wont find many bigman that lock down both sides of the floor like he did. he is one of the most clutch players in the 2000's.
No no, absolutely he could have gotten a ring elsewhere, OR, he could have been wasted to death, ala Garnett.Originally Posted by Bigmike23
you really think a great player like Duncan doesnt get a ring some how? that spurs team was built around him. you dont think boston would do the same?
u touched on about all those PF tht had more talent then him. IMO that is what made him so great. he didnt have all the talent in the world but would work on his game summer after summer and add stuff to it. you wont find many bigman that lock down both sides of the floor like he did. he is one of the most clutch players in the 2000's.