- 364
- 90
Then you are 10% of the target population. People like options. Not to mention that obviously you will still be able to play games. No need to be purposefully dense.I really just want to play games.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Then you are 10% of the target population. People like options. Not to mention that obviously you will still be able to play games. No need to be purposefully dense.I really just want to play games.
Then you are 10% of the target population. People like options. Not to mention that obviously you will still be able to play games. No need to be purposefully dense.I really just want to play games.
I stream my stuff from my laptop to my tv....
Ok all I care about is the gaming. I could careless about the rest.MS didn't reveal the specs for the One but from the devkits leaked, the PS4 is more powerful but I'm sure the One will have more TV features
I thought the Xbox 360 ran more smoothly and the graphics were a bit better. I asked the question though because I want to know if one was expected to be a lot better then the other.We still debating the 360 and PS3 on those subjects. No way we'll know this after a couple press releases.
SO SPEC ARE WEAKER THEN THE PS4?I guess what I can add from this image is:
-Runs on the latest WinRT framework as well as interfaces with Windows Phone Runtime
-DDR3 ram
-GPU is clocking at 800 Mhz
-CPU is a 1.6 Ghz clock, 8 cores was already announced
-There's been a discrepancy as there has been 4MB and 8MB cache but the latest kits have 4MB
-SATA 2.0 drive
I stream my stuff from my laptop to my tv....
What about stuff like youtube and streaming websites? You have to connect the laptop for that. The xbox and ps3 youtube apps are terrible. :x
Xbox One Is Not Always Online, But Seems To Restrict Used Games
The next Xbox won't require an Internet connection to function, but could very well block used games, unless you feel like paying Microsoft some extra cash.
Wired got a look at Xbox One before today's big reveal, and they say that games will require installation to use. “On the new Xbox, all game discs are installed to the HDD to play,” Microsoft told them.
But games will be tied to an Xbox Live account, Wired reveals—or else you'd just be able to pass games around to everyone you know. And if you want to link a game to a second account, you'll have to pay a fee:
What follows naturally from this is that each disc would have to be tied to a unique Xbox Live account, else you could take a single disc and pass it between everyone you know and copy the game over and over. Since this is clearly not going to happen, each disc must then only install for a single owner.
Microsoft did say that if a disc was used with a second account, that owner would be given the option to pay a fee and install the game from the disc, which would then mean that the new account would also own the game and could play it without the disc.
But what if a second person simply wanted to put the disc in and play the game without installing – and without paying extra? In other words, what happens to our traditional concept of a “used game”? This is a question for which Microsoft did not yet have an answer, and is surely something that game buyers (as well as renters and lenders) will want to know.
After going tru 3 360 due to rrod , disk drive failure and being ban from Xbox live I am not getting this until a year later after release date. If its over $800 and they have ******** rules with live, then Microsoft can kiss my ***, I am switching to PS4
Weaker, but the PS3 was VASTLY more powerful than the Xbox 360, and that never ended up mattering much. I heard a statistic on NPR yesterday that more people connect to Xbox Live for multimedia use than to play multiplayer games, so clearly Microsoft knew what they were doing with the press conference. Ornery forum posters are not the general population.
wired controllers are better. Quicker response time and smaller so you get a better grip. When you play a ton of shooters it mattersprays for wired version
why
exactly what i want to know. man they already getting money for the console u want extra money if i let someone borrow my game????
Xbox One Is Not Always Online, But Seems To Restrict Used Games
The next Xbox won't require an Internet connection to function, but could very well block used games, unless you feel like paying Microsoft some extra cash.
Wired got a look at Xbox One before today's big reveal, and they say that games will require installation to use. “On the new Xbox, all game discs are installed to the HDD to play,” Microsoft told them.
But games will be tied to an Xbox Live account, Wired reveals—or else you'd just be able to pass games around to everyone you know. And if you want to link a game to a second account, you'll have to pay a fee:
What follows naturally from this is that each disc would have to be tied to a unique Xbox Live account, else you could take a single disc and pass it between everyone you know and copy the game over and over. Since this is clearly not going to happen, each disc must then only install for a single owner.
Microsoft did say that if a disc was used with a second account, that owner would be given the option to pay a fee and install the game from the disc, which would then mean that the new account would also own the game and could play it without the But what if a second person simply wanted to put the disc in and play the game without installing – and without paying extra? In other words, what happens to our traditional concept of a “used game”? This is a question for which Microsoft did not yet have an answer, and is surely something that game buyers (as well as renters and lenders) will want to know.want to know.
http://kotaku.com/the-xbox-is-not-always-online-but-seems-to-block-used-509077987
Yea, ya'll act like if Sony actually had a PS4 to demo at their conference that it wouldnt be the same exact thing basically. This isnt for the games (I was hoping for a little more but E3 is right around the corner, im not sweatin it too much)
You gotta show the **** that puts your console above the other one. And showing games being developed for both consoles isnt going to swing anyone one way or another.
Sony showed a lot more exclusives
The only one that looked promising was Watch Dogs. And even that was basically just GTA. But at the same time they didnt even have a console reveal. I still dont know what the ps4 is going to look like. I just know what the controller will look like (and even thats not great)
It's not going to cost $800. It's not going to cost $700. It's not going to cost $600.
Granted this isn't E3, that said this keynote pales in comparison to the Playstation keynote.
How the hell did you figure that... they didn't even show the ******g system nor any in game gameplay just cutscenes like every other company.
System reveal wise - M$ > Sony... ten fold.
fut fifa 14 only on xbox **** you bill gates
i just read that the APU is on 40nm
are these guys ******g serious?
no way