All I will say is that when you have the track record of someone like Brady, it really does give you more leniency when it comes to screaming at your teammates. Someone like Cutler does it and he's labeled a bad leader, but it's all relative. That's just how it is.
Exactly this.
You guys see Cutler as you want (as he's portrayed in the media), not a leader, crybaby, etc. I can't really measure whether or not he is a leader - the term gets thrown around so often without a definite definition. What exactly does a leader do? Does he win? If so, Cutler would fall under that definition because of his record with the Bears. Is the leader a good teammate so to speak? If so, Cutler would be that leader by all accounts of his teammates. Same goes with Rivers, Romo, etc. Sure, guys like Rivers and Cutler are trash talkers but they're loved by their teammates. Does a leader win a Super Bowl? Well that question seems to answer itself, but it doesn't mean other QBs can't be leaders. Would that make Dan Marino not a leader since he didn't win a ring? I would hope you answer no.
You can say Brady has a few SB rings and it makes his antics OK - but that just reinforces the double standard. Cutler gets ripped for his lack of enthusiasm, tantrums, bad body language and you say he's not a leader because of that. Brady turns around, throws a tantrum, and all of a sudden that's just OK because he's got a few rings? Cutler has always taken accountability for his mistakes and has not once thrown anyone under the bus. The J'Marcus Webb incident was the only one I can recall. And from what I have gathered, leaders take blame for everything even when it's not their fault.
There are ways to lead without being a fiery guy. Eli Manning is the perfect example. You don't have to be all hoorah to get a point across. Cutler doesn't show much emotion because if he did his blood sugar level would rise (this just feels weird to type
). I don't think Brady should be maligned for his tantrum, just that the media needs to be called out for its double standard.
Just because you're accomplished doesn't make you a leader. As a diehard Bulls fan, I never saw Jordan as a true leader. You might think I'm crazy, but at what extremes were his actions justified? Did he really need to constantly berate his teammates? We've all heard the stories of how harsh he was. Let's just take one example: when he called Will Perdue "Will Vanderbilt" because Jordan didn't think he should be named after a Big Ten school. I mean, if you were to hear that from your teammate, wouldn't that just straight up piss you off? Since when did childish insults factor into leadership?