DeadsetAce
Supporter
- May 31, 2004
- 107,493
- 53,680
what the **** is this ********?!?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But conveniently ignore his 200 yard 2 TD game against Denver right?
No one forgot. YOU must have forgotten how much us "haters" praised him for that game.Forget his 270 yard 3 TD game against Carolina right?
His 200 yard 1 TD game with a 65% completion percentage against Frisco in 2013, forget that right?
His defense was no where to be found that day, hence the reason why the Seahawks lost the game in spite of Wilson having a great game.Forget his 385 yard 3 total TD game against Atlanta his rookie year, where was his defense to prop him up that day? Huh?
The sad thing is, I think the majority of us like Russell Wilson the QB. He's fun to watch.
We just hate y'all.
The man is what he is. Let it be.
The sad thing is, I think the majority of us like Russell Wilson the QB. He's fun to watch.
We just hate y'all.
The man is what he is. Let it be.
Well, there are multiple reasons for any SB bound team. QB being the primary reason 99 out of 100 times.
True but there are multiple reasons for that other than him. What does he do skill wise better than luck?
[COLOR=#red]Aaron Rodgers
Andrew Luck (miss in a different way, a miss is a miss)
Tony Romo (see above)
Teddy Bridgewater
Kaep
RG3
Tannehill on roll outs...
just off the top of my head.
I've never disputed the fact that I think RW is a good QB in the perfect situation.
He isn't one of a kind.
He didn't win that game, he played well for 4 minutes.[/COLOR]
Luck is a damm LB and when he takes off he's mowing people down.
He may not be as "mobile" as RW but can RW throwing 20 yard darts with dudes hanging off him like Luck?
No.
Seattle's Running game >>>>>>>> Indy's whatever they call itWell, there are multiple reasons for any SB bound team. QB being the primary reason 99 out of 100 times.
True but there are multiple reasons for that other than him. What does he do skill wise better than luck?
Indy WR's > Sea WR's, yet we got a potential back-to-back champ on the horizon...
I'm not saying I'm taking Wilson over Luck in a draft, but I'm saying the gap is closer than most give him credit for...
Indy WR's > Sea WR's, yet we got a potential back-to-back champ on the horizon...
I find it hard to root for Russell Wilson because of NT and the 10 or so (used to be 1 legit fan) Seahawks fans who only started showing up at my local spot on Sundays after 2012
Marshawn Lynch > Zurlon Tipton
But name me one tho bro, name me one. How many QBs can make defenders miss like he can and throw on the run like him?
But name me one tho bro, name me one. How many QBs can make defenders miss like he can and throw on the run like him?
Aaron Rodgers.....
That's it?
Great , but I gave the rebuttable to the first part of your statement with my statement.
Luck may not be as "mobile" as RW, but RW isn't as strong as luck.
Like I said, RW isn't throwing a 20 yard dart with a DL hanging off him like luck does, and we've seen him do.