- 3,018
- 1,252
Nike Air Jordan 1 "Chicago" - May 30, 2015. (LEGIT CHECK IN 1st POST)
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by geraldg2309,
- Start date
- 21,698
- 7,579
All of those names are Spanish too... Coincidence??? Doubt it
- 1,159
- 852
i was thinking the same thing, they have to be filtering out the entries by address.... The moon landing 90s seemed the same way.
kilroythedon
Supporter
- 23,181
- 22,059
http://niketalk.com/t/628511/air-jordan-1-chicago-8-5#post_23510815
Here's the pair I picked up the other day
Here's the pair I picked up the other day
- 85,058
- 113,576
Aitor Alejandro Martinez Montuenga stole my pair
alp
Banned
- 39,966
- 8,990
has to happen once in a while. Now with most releases they become practically worthless a few days after release if not out the gate, something like a chicago makes up for that
- 21,698
- 7,579
has to happen once in a while. Now with most releases they become practically worthless a few days after release if not out the gate, something like a chicago makes up for that
This was one of those rare cases, crazy how everything just exploded.
Never forget!! Never settle!!
- 228
- 60
So the Chi leather is better or worse than the Breds?
kilroythedon
Supporter
- 23,181
- 22,059
has to happen once in a while. Now with most releases they become practically worthless a few days after release if not out the gate, something like a chicago makes up for that
LOL Imma let the resellers eat man.
It's a good point you make though
Last edited:
Rumble Gang
formerly retrohead182
- 7,981
- 4,083
@GrizzlyAnimal that gif!! Take this rep
- 7,994
- 10,206
We're really still discussing the leather in comparison to the 2013's 10 days after release? 
Rumble Gang
formerly retrohead182
- 7,981
- 4,083
Does this really surprise you? Whats wrong with that? Ppl still talking leather comparison in the LM 1 threadWe're really still discussing the leather in comparison to the 2013's 10 days after release?
- 23,107
- 15,455
Talking bout the same things over n over is like a Dog Chasing it's Tail!
Quality Comparison Talkage
Quality Comparison Talkage
- 486
- 139
Better than breds.
Last edited:
- 1,763
- 808
some dude in my local group won, "juno park"
- 419
- 225
Better, its a lot more supple.
- 7,994
- 10,206
Well you have to have your head buried in the sand to ask if 2013 quality is better than the 2015 leather quality. Lazy people on here. Debating best leather is one thing, asking stupid questions is another. Which is what this thread is at this point.Does this really surprise you? Whats wrong with that? Ppl still talking leather comparison in the LM 1 threadWe're really still discussing the leather in comparison to the 2013's 10 days after release?
- 419
- 225
If someone offered me $500 i would probably have to let them go lol. Hell This guy offered me 570 for my ds 09' space jams and i let them go.
- 23,107
- 15,455
Mad I missed the Sivas Raffle for the Moon Landings more then the Jordans
Those were Impossible to Snatch up!
Those were Impossible to Snatch up!
Last edited:
- 21,698
- 7,579
Man if someone offered me.... Nevermind I already been wearing the **** out of them 
Rumble Gang
formerly retrohead182
- 7,981
- 4,083
We're really still discussing the leather in comparison to the 2013's 10 days after release?
Ah I see your point there. Thought you meant just the general discussion. Though I will say man recent releases I've had the chance to hold more than 1 or 2 pair in hand and there are differences in "softness". That tends to mislead ppl as well when it comes to other comparisons.
- 9,011
- 7,197
I feel you bro. Moon Landings>>>Chicagos
alp
Banned
- 39,966
- 8,990
I'd take a pair of moon landings for one of my chicagos all day
- 5,235
- 4,877
Moon landings are a terrible looking hype beast shoe. You speaking blasphemy bro
alp
Banned
- 39,966
- 8,990
nah it's a great sneaker
