rainking
Supporter
- Aug 12, 2016
- 8,309
- 18,144
Yeah that was my point, I DO consider this pair a lucky pair. And it's still not what it should be. It's like, alright, Nike, you don't want to fix all the issues that M marztharealist points out, which are all hugely valid, then fine. Change the shape, change the height, all of the dumb changes you insist on compared to the OGs and '99s. But ****, at least use some halfway decent leather and don't produce shoes that don't come close to matching each other and that come with loads of weird creases and bumps and wrinkles right out of the box. No excuse for that, not at $100 and certainly not at $200.Consider yourself lucky. I seen some terrible pairs that look used. Jb know people copping online and shooting more stock that way... people can't say no to shoes they can't examine first. Anyways like dude said, people will still hype em and buy em and run the prices up.