- Jan 13, 2004
- 2,662
- 750
So this is actually the Infrared IV done up with OG shape + blocking
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You‘re really thinking about passing at YOUR age? Come on.Will wait to see on the color. If those NDC pics are representative, I just saved money again.
They didn't fix **** LOL. Pretty much the same jacked-up geometries as IVs have been.
They lie.They had to have changed something, I don’t think they’d make a point to say this otherwise lol but who knows...
What do you mean the toe was what I was saying, it looks like the brought it down so it's not so tall. I know it's not as rounded but my BC 4s rounded out the more I wore them. I feel like it looks like the same toe shape as the 2020 fire reds.They didn't fix **** LOL. Pretty much the same jacked-up geometries as IVs have been. And why are they using the wrong hang tag again? Not like I care about a tag, but it's just funny how much they seem to not know their own history.
Will wait to see on the color. If those NDC pics are representative, I just saved money again.
What do you mean the toe was what I was saying, it looks like the brought it down so it's not so tall. I know it's not as rounded but my BC 4s rounded out the more I wore them. I feel like it looks like the same toe shape as the 2020 fire reds.
If the COLOR is wrong, it's not the same shoe I had back in '89, so I don't care about them.You‘re really thinking about passing at YOUR age? Come on.
Ok. I can’t pass. I’ll be 100 years old before they get even the color right.If the COLOR is wrong, it's not the same shoe I had back in '89, so I don't care about them.
Yeah its definitely square in the front I thought you meant the height of them. I feel it wouldn't look so off if they had the actual shape of the sneaker on par with the OG because some of the og shots have a higher toe rand and it looks sleeker and pulled back more.We must have very different eyes LOL. Looks square as usual. If it's somehow a bit lower but the shape is still square, not really a big improvement for me.
I feel this too!If the COLOR is wrong, it's not the same shoe I had back in '89, so I don't care about them.
They lie.
Stitch for stitch remake.Yeah, the Nike/SNKRS description of the navy snake 11 lows claimed they were "virtually a stitch-for-stitch remake" of the 2000 pair. As much as I love my retro pairs, they are most definitely not the same as the OG navy snakes.
Ok. I can’t pass. I’ll be 100 years old before they get even the color right.
You‘re really thinking about passing at YOUR age? Come on.
Trust me, I hear ya and I understand where you are coming from. I also had the OG’s. The game playing by them sucks.If the COLOR is wrong, it's not the same shoe I had back in '89, so I don't care about them.
All they got to do is raise the damn back a bit higher.These things have gone from OG to Oh Jeez this ****s again!