- Dec 18, 2012
- 7,979
- 20,917
This thread bumped again to remind me of how bad I slept on these
Nike Air Jordan Retro Metallic V - 7/23/16
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by ozuna23,
- Start date
- Aug 6, 2014
- 3,587
- 1,299
same lol.
- Jun 19, 2005
- 10,074
- 5,885
Wore mine over the weekend and came to really appreciate the lighter edges.
I still think that these have been the most accurate looking retro besides 11's that have released since. of course besides the tongue. wonder if anyone has tried to apply a matte finish to the tongue if it was dull it would be damn near og minus Durabuck although this nubuck looks really close.
- Feb 7, 2010
- 8,071
- 15,109
- Apr 18, 2017
- 682
- 1,988
wish i doubled on these. such a dope release!!!
- Aug 25, 2012
- 509
- 346
mine still crispy
- Aug 10, 2012
- 20,309
- 36,645
I'm so glad I got these easy on release day July 2016 because a former associate of mine who was an assistant manager at Champs hooked it up for me via raffle system. She ensured I would get on the list to pick up on release day. I'm glad I tried to be smart to use my hookup sparingly to get these.
She also hooked me up in December 2015 with the Maroon VI besides these black/metallic V.
She also hooked me up in December 2015 with the Maroon VI besides these black/metallic V.
- May 15, 2003
- 56,646
- 65,572
- May 22, 2014
- 1,013
- 1,583
Why so bitter
- Apr 7, 2013
- 5,256
- 7,911
- Dec 3, 2005
- 76
- 114
Someone help a brother legit check
niketalk.com
thanks in advance for your help.
Jordan 5 Metallic legit check
Somebody help a brother out w a legit check. Copped the pair from EBay.
niketalk.com
thanks in advance for your help.
- Dec 3, 2005
- 76
- 114
Here’s some other pictures. Thanks again.
Attachments
- Oct 23, 2006
- 428
- 291
These look a little off, something about the tongue just isn’t right.
- Dec 3, 2005
- 76
- 114
Thanks as soon as I got them I felt the same way about the tongue I’m gonna request the seller to return.
- Feb 8, 2009
- 20,070
- 10,959
Very fake.
Material on the upper looks wrong, and is missing the raw edges (I'll toss a picture or two at the end for a point of reference.)
Plastic eyestay pieces look like cheap hole-punched squares instead of the rounded squares on real pairs.
The tongue's reflective material should look glossy. Also, even factoring in poor quality control on real pairs; the tongue on that pair is excessively jagged and sloppy in various places (look at the jumpman and the border around it.)
There's more that can be pointed out, but that should be enough to illustrate the point.
Real pair:
- Dec 3, 2005
- 76
- 114
Thank you all for your help. I’ve requested a return!Very fake.
Material on the upper looks wrong, and is missing the raw edges (I'll toss a picture or two at the end for a point of reference.)
Plastic eyestay pieces look like cheap hole-punched squares instead of the rounded squares on real pairs.
The tongue's reflective material should look glossy. Also, even factoring in poor quality control on real pairs; the tongue on that pair is excessively jagged and sloppy in various places (look at the jumpman and the border around it.)
There's more that can be pointed out, but that should be enough to illustrate the point.
Real pair:
- Feb 12, 2014
- 5,269
- 6,899
I see it now... Tongue is short too with the jumpman nearly at the top. That's sucks... Such a hassle.
- Aug 21, 2010
- 11,200
- 17,273
These really going for $500 in my size 12.
- May 22, 2020
- 193
- 264
Been looking also and it’s crazy for size 12 folks.
- Sep 30, 2006
- 15,802
- 12,198
Very fake.
Material on the upper looks wrong, and is missing the raw edges (I'll toss a picture or two at the end for a point of reference.)
Plastic eyestay pieces look like cheap hole-punched squares instead of the rounded squares on real pairs.
The tongue's reflective material should look glossy. Also, even factoring in poor quality control on real pairs; the tongue on that pair is excessively jagged and sloppy in various places (look at the jumpman and the border around it.)
There's more that can be pointed out, but that should be enough to illustrate the point.
Real pair:
so dam beautiful
- May 22, 2014
- 1,013
- 1,583
Good rundown!Very fake.
Material on the upper looks wrong, and is missing the raw edges (I'll toss a picture or two at the end for a point of reference.)
Plastic eyestay pieces look like cheap hole-punched squares instead of the rounded squares on real pairs.
The tongue's reflective material should look glossy. Also, even factoring in poor quality control on real pairs; the tongue on that pair is excessively jagged and sloppy in various places (look at the jumpman and the border around it.)
There's more that can be pointed out, but that should be enough to illustrate the point.
Real pair:
Yeah speaking of the jumpmans, the right shoe jumpman is a lighter red than the left. At first I thought it may just be the lighting but nope.
- Jan 19, 2007
- 20,412
- 18,624
I had 3. I sold off one. I regret it now. 
Funny thing is the V was not even in my crosshairs. My mind was on other Retros. I still had a hangover from the 11 retro release etc. but then the silver tongue dropped and then everyone was offloading these blk/silver thanks in part to the documentary.
Funny thing is the V was not even in my crosshairs. My mind was on other Retros. I still had a hangover from the 11 retro release etc. but then the silver tongue dropped and then everyone was offloading these blk/silver thanks in part to the documentary.
- Oct 10, 2019
- 1,467
- 4,062
so early January my collection was stolen and I was left with a few pairs of sneakers. It was truly a devastating experience that I wish on no sneakerhead. Well I figured I'd be doing small updates here and there of the shoes I do pickup but here was a steal I found locally for $50. God is good and will continue to bless those who always put there best foot forward and treat others how they'd like to be treated. Anyways end rant here's the kicks!
- Dec 7, 2018
- 2,267
- 5,926
Jeez I need these in my life. Can't do the crazy resell though.
