- Jan 2, 2023
- 1,284
- 3,815
That first part is true, however the Grapes have always been my least fav color way of the OG 5’s.
Nike Air Jordan Retro Metallic V - 7/23/16
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by ozuna23,
- Start date
- May 9, 2013
- 914
- 1,723
I agree with washed king. I had the 13 black tongue and they were cool but the white grapes and black grapes I had back then were icy and head turners for sure. That grape and aqua combined with a fresh outsole before yellowing is super clean.
dhtowng
Supporter
- May 22, 2010
- 9,907
- 20,770
Grape 5s were my first Jordan as kid so they’ll always hold a special place for me. I’d say they’re the best cw of the 5 for sure. White FRs and Black Metallics are a tie with BTs coming in last. Still badly need a retro of the BTs.
- Aug 10, 2012
- 20,310
- 36,646
You can easily tell this is so 1990 or somewhere near that period based on the photo quality and colors along with the clothing Alfonso Ribeiro is wearing. I also find it ridiculous they couldn't just refer to him by his real name instead of trying to be funny and use his character name since he was in the real world and not on the set of Fresh Prince Of Bel-Air.
The Fresh Prince
formerly airsakuragi
- Nov 17, 2014
- 13,551
- 9,622
I’m glad I was able to secure the 2018 version; Jordan 5s are now in my top 5 to be honest.
- Aug 10, 2012
- 20,310
- 36,646
- Jan 10, 2013
- 429
- 2,404
Man I forget how much better the tongue looked on the OG and the 00. Something strange about this new 3M they use.
- Dec 7, 2015
- 2,183
- 7,039
The Jade Horizon 5s that released a few months has 3M on the tongue that doesn't seem to have the weird sheen to it that the 3M on the '16 Metallic and '20 Fire Reds use. Grey needs to be darker though to match the OG look.
- May 9, 2013
- 914
- 1,723
‘11 is the shoe that caused me to fall in love with Jordan’s in high school. someone asked me to watch them while he goes to the bathroom.
Still have my ‘16 but they are yellow and beat.
With that all said.
‘90 or ‘00 me please Nike!
Still have my ‘16 but they are yellow and beat.
With that all said.
‘90 or ‘00 me please Nike!
- Sep 30, 2006
- 15,802
- 12,198
jades wasnt a bad c/w
- Aug 9, 2014
- 12,841
- 27,945
Someone asked u to watch his shoes while he went to the bathroom
lmao that’s random af
- Apr 16, 2014
- 23,910
- 48,293
......Did he go in the bathroom barefoot?
- May 9, 2013
- 914
- 1,723
we were in Football so we would workout before school. Then we had 1st period off cause of athletics so we would shower at school then all mingle in the cafeteria until 2nd period. So often we would have the clothes we change into for school with us.
- Feb 12, 2014
- 5,269
- 6,903
Had these in '91. I recall while I was playing hockey and had left them neatly under the bench in the changing room, someone took them and put them in the freak'n garbage while I was on the ice. Kids can be vial human beings. For someone who didn't like the shoes to even touch each other to avoid scuffing, needless to say I was heated. I separated my shoulder that night in the game, so it was definitely a bad night.
- Aug 10, 2012
- 20,310
- 36,646
Good observation because the tongue on the 1990 & 2000 versions have more of a dullness, whereas the tongue 2016 version is much more shiny. And they always use cheaper materials with any rehash by default.
The 3M/reflective material Nike has been using lately is indeed quite shiny.
I’ve noticed it on the rehash 3M Snake Air Force 1 from 2021. The silver has a strange sheen that looks terrible. I wonder if the new shiny material is going to be more durable in the long run.
Only time will tell I suppose.
- Aug 10, 2012
- 20,310
- 36,646
- Mar 20, 2008
- 906
- 641
Do you think these are still wearable if ds? Plan on grabbing a pair.
- Jul 18, 2012
- 2,464
- 3,116
2016's are wearable.
rainking
Supporter
- Aug 12, 2016
- 8,303
- 18,100
Bruh. What? They came out three years ago
- Mar 20, 2008
- 906
- 641
Black metallics. 2016Bruh. What? They came out three years ago
rainking
Supporter
- Aug 12, 2016
- 8,303
- 18,100
Totally my fault, I thought I was in the Fire Red V thread. Oops.That said, the answer is still the same. Seven years is fine, though I guess it's entirely possible that if someone stored the shoes DS in poor conditions, they could separate when worn after that amount of time. Seems pretty unlikely to me, though. In my personal experience, I don't really even start worrying at all about these kind of issues until a pair of shoes is like 10 years old.
- Jun 4, 2008
- 1,352
- 911
Black Metallic’s are my #1 Jordan of all time. I really hope they dial in the tongue for the next release, no more plastic bubble over-sized tongue please.
- Jan 2, 2023
- 1,284
- 3,815
Black Mets are my favorite 5. I missed out on the 16’ pair need these back.
- Jul 21, 2020
- 235
- 417
Honestly it’d be dope if they released them in OG form with the NA and the 23 on side. Just not ”re-imagined” please
