- Feb 14, 2016
- 381
- 101
Lol ok. I just saw it show up on my feed. I thought it was odd no one had mentioned it but I see why.
Nike Air Jordan Retro Metallic V - 7/23/16
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by ozuna23,
- Start date
- Aug 3, 2013
- 4,206
- 2,409
Mann, still 3 months out.. 
I been lookin forward to these more than any other drops this year.. Remind me of Middle School. It's a shame Nike/JB won't drop em with the OG shape, the bunk pairs starting to look like the real deal.
I been lookin forward to these more than any other drops this year.. Remind me of Middle School. It's a shame Nike/JB won't drop em with the OG shape, the bunk pairs starting to look like the real deal.
airthompson
Staff member
- Jul 30, 2008
- 13,829
- 9,635
- Jan 3, 2009
- 13,331
- 11,579
Damn R.I.P
dhtowng
Supporter
- May 22, 2010
- 9,954
- 20,933
Lol Perfect. This made me smile, been such a sad day. RIP
- May 12, 2015
- 1,804
- 500
All 3 of em gone now... Legends RIP
- Nov 7, 2014
- 2,718
- 9,091
Mann, still 3 months out..
I feel you
agzie
, I'm passing on the Black & Red 12's, so I can possibly triple up on these. I'm just praying they turn out good. These are one of my favorite Jordan's of all-time. I'm actually feeling the toe box, on those UA's.I hope we get the Black Supreme 5's durabuck, and better 3M. If we could get the 2000 retro 3M, that would definitely justify the $220+ price. I wouldn't mind paying it at all.
Overall, the shape on those UA's was nice IMO. But, I wasn't feeling the suede like material used. The "E", in Nike is still hella off. (Yes, I know they're GM's) I also had to watch the vid on mute. That Ratchet dudes vocabulary makes me ears bleed.
Last edited:
- Sep 30, 2006
- 15,804
- 12,202
Ah I see
- Apr 23, 2015
- 8,799
- 10,386
Aside from the jumpman on the lace lock and the corky E on Nike this is basically what we're getting, right? These are looking real nice to me.
Dat toebox
Last edited:
Aquamanjay_
formerly jaylaw15
- Dec 18, 2014
- 8,180
- 9,262
call me crazy but i seriously doubt that's what we'll get. Im sure we'll get what was shown in the Nike preview which looks different than these early pairs whether people admit it or not
Aside from the jumpman on the lace lock and the corky E on Nike this is basically what we're getting, right? These are looking real nice to me.
Dat toebox
All these early pairs look cheap as hell
Last edited:
x-alt
Banned
- Dec 16, 2015
- 1,216
- 236
Aside from the jumpman on the lace lock and the corky E on Nike this is basically what we're getting, right? These are looking real nice to me.
Dat toebox
There's a UA with a Nike lacelock.
They don't that much.
Blue Soles: Check
Nikebuck: Check
Supreme 5 toebox: ?
Nike Outsole: Check
Last edited:
Mister Meaner
formerly super producer j
- Mar 24, 2007
- 20,530
- 10,989
Could someone tell me if these will be coming out in kid's sizes?
- Apr 30, 2002
- 7,645
- 9,733
Yes they will
- May 12, 2015
- 1,804
- 500
I don't know if I'm copping my daughter. Hopefully she wants these or something in that same time.
Mister Meaner
formerly super producer j
- Mar 24, 2007
- 20,530
- 10,989
[emoji]128526[/emoji] thanks
- Apr 4, 2004
- 4,515
- 1,300
Need
- Jun 13, 2005
- 3,018
- 1,252
3m is a company that makes reflective material. Im sure JB doesnt use them currently for their products seeing that the reflective material has been cheap for the last 10 years and 3m is the top of the spectrum as far as their quality of products is concerned. I still dont know why people call reflective material a company name(3m)
- Feb 1, 2012
- 1,451
- 1,384
It's for the same reason people call tissue paper, Kleenex.
Also, 3M has been a supplier to Nike before.
Last edited:
- Jun 7, 2013
- 664
- 150
Vaseline vs. Petroleum Jelly; Pampers vs. Diapers; Windex vs. Glass Cleaner.
Sometimes the brand name sticks even if you don't purchase it.
Sometimes the brand name sticks even if you don't purchase it.
- Apr 30, 2002
- 7,645
- 9,733
I believe the product name is called scotchlite
- Apr 30, 2002
- 7,645
- 9,733
3M might not be making this material that is now supplied to Nike. I'd be curious to see when the 25 year patent for this stuff ran out.
- Feb 1, 2012
- 1,451
- 1,384
US patents run 20 years if valid. 3M has a ridiculous amount of patents, not sure which one, if any apply to a specific shoe. Use google patents to search if interested. There are several under scotchlite.
We use 3M reflective products in the garments we produce, there are other similar companies that offer the same. Doesn't seem like Nike has ever needed or been interested in co-branding with 3M.
- Feb 17, 2010
- 11,459
- 15,619
Aside from the jumpman on the lace lock and the corky E on Nike this is basically what we're getting, right? These are looking real nice to me.
Dat toebox
Blam blam
Last edited:
- Dec 24, 2013
- 19,057
- 9,031
3m 13s were pretty decent
- Jun 13, 2005
- 3,018
- 1,252
My point was that 3m is a company that sells many products. Target sells many products under the market name, so when we eat their cereal, we don't say, Man that target was really good today, or refer to all cereal as target.
