- Jul 3, 2014
- 913
- 1,983
Imma make these work
Nike Mac Attack - McEnroes forgotten gem
- Thread in 'Nike Retro' Thread starter Started by Noto,
- Start date
- Feb 18, 2013
- 18,101
- 8,660
Got them thangs stretched like bugs bunny gonna wear em
- Feb 1, 2019
- 2,755
- 5,686
I think the Barney joints are a pass
- Jul 3, 2014
- 913
- 1,983
These should be called “Jokers”
Nike Mac Attack "Wimbledon" Releases May 2024
Nike Mac Attack Wimbledon FZ2097-101 Release Date: May 2024 Color: White/Hyper Grape-Court Green Price: $130 USDsneakerbardetroit.com
- Apr 28, 2022
- 777
- 3,432
- Jul 3, 2014
- 913
- 1,983
Love the fat shaming.....
anyways, I'm far from fat. I do barefoot running(now just wear zero drop shoes when I run) because of knee issues. As a result I have slightly wider feet, but have so issues with most others shoes . Guaranteed spend more time in the gym than you, but keep on trolling like a 12 year old....
anyways, I'm far from fat. I do barefoot running(now just wear zero drop shoes when I run) because of knee issues. As a result I have slightly wider feet, but have so issues with most others shoes . Guaranteed spend more time in the gym than you, but keep on trolling like a 12 year old....
- Jul 22, 2012
- 37,524
- 32,678
Better than expected, but I know the first official wear will kind of hurt. Happy how they look.
- Apr 30, 2011
- 8,427
- 11,498
Got em lookin likeImma make these work
- Jan 7, 2013
- 218
- 520
"The Wimbledon" aka "The Joker"
- Aug 11, 2015
- 9,737
- 14,243
Those attacks are going back they are fine length wise (pause) but they are so xxxx narrow and I'm not trying to break them in and why are they so narrow and I don't have a fat foot and I like this cw
- Apr 4, 2003
- 4,191
- 2,818
Lmao, unfortunately can't stretch the midsole of the shoe, your foot is going to be resting on the edges of the midsole which is not good for your feet. Sending my pair back sadly, this shoe just isn't for me.Imma make these work
- Sep 28, 2004
- 13,926
- 5,907
got my pairs today. On my feet asap
Anyone dealing with creasing like this?
It’s only happening on the right pair.
Not even remotely mad as the upper is just too soft and the pair is seemingly comfortable. Just wondering if it’s a flaw of some sort.
After having owned pinky toe crushers in the air trainer 1 and 3, and even your air structure triax retro which ran really really narrow, these don’t seem so bad at all.
Tongue seems incredibly thin to the point of me questioning it ripping when i pull the tongue out. Was the original like this?
Overall, I’m truly only buying 2-4 pairs yearly now, and these are quite stellar all things considered.
Wish they made a 13.5. I’m more of a 12.5 in normal times. These 14s aren’t overly roomy. In fact they’re my first size 14 (as that size in an air trainer is literally impossible to find. So I’ve sort of had a 12-13 size range for decades now. I was worried these would be too roomy. Not really the case
I can’t believe people are returning these.
Anyone dealing with creasing like this?
It’s only happening on the right pair.
Not even remotely mad as the upper is just too soft and the pair is seemingly comfortable. Just wondering if it’s a flaw of some sort.
After having owned pinky toe crushers in the air trainer 1 and 3, and even your air structure triax retro which ran really really narrow, these don’t seem so bad at all.
Tongue seems incredibly thin to the point of me questioning it ripping when i pull the tongue out. Was the original like this?
Overall, I’m truly only buying 2-4 pairs yearly now, and these are quite stellar all things considered.
Wish they made a 13.5. I’m more of a 12.5 in normal times. These 14s aren’t overly roomy. In fact they’re my first size 14 (as that size in an air trainer is literally impossible to find. So I’ve sort of had a 12-13 size range for decades now. I was worried these would be too roomy. Not really the case
I can’t believe people are returning these.
- Feb 15, 2020
- 803
- 816
Welp. I’m a tts 10.5. Tried these in an 11 and an 11.5. Didn’t matter, way too narrow and my feet hang over the midsole. Just returned both pairs to my local Nike store. This model just ain’t for me. Narrowest shoe I ever put on.
- Jul 28, 2004
- 859
- 864
I went half up and did not regret it and I have narrow feet. Love them. Very comfy. Wearing as we speak.
Attachments
- Apr 10, 2014
- 4,188
- 15,503
Info on them laces too I might need to order a pair looks great in the attacks
- Aug 13, 2000
- 2,106
- 702
Shipping was pretty fast! I wore them most of the day today, and they are very light and comfortable. I went TTS, too (sz 12).
- Apr 4, 2003
- 4,191
- 2,818
These are much more narrow than the structure triax91, the structure is narrow at the tip this shoe is narrow overall. My foot measures 12.5 so I go for 13 in most shoes which usually fit me perfect -exception being the huarache where I need a 14- but if you pull the insole out and put your foot on it I can almost guarantee a good amount of your foot is hanging off the edge which is really bad for your footgot my pairs today. On my feet asap
Anyone dealing with creasing like this?
It’s only happening on the right pair.
Not even remotely mad as the upper is just too soft and the pair is seemingly comfortable. Just wondering if it’s a flaw of some sort.
After having owned pinky toe crushers in the air trainer 1 and 3, and even your air structure triax retro which ran really really narrow, these don’t seem so bad at all.
Tongue seems incredibly thin to the point of me questioning it ripping when i pull the tongue out. Was the original like this?
Overall, I’m truly only buying 2-4 pairs yearly now, and these are quite stellar all things considered.
Wish they made a 13.5. I’m more of a 12.5 in normal times. These 14s aren’t overly roomy. In fact they’re my first size 14 (as that size in an air trainer is literally impossible to find. So I’ve sort of had a 12-13 size range for decades now. I was worried these would be too roomy. Not really the case
I can’t believe people are returning these.
How'd this work out for you?Imma make these work
- Apr 22, 2012
- 85,316
- 114,989
Edit
- Sep 27, 2005
- 10,234
- 3,635
Nike took so long to make a simple shoe available that i don’t feel concerned in copping anymore
I like em a lot, they remind me of the court forces which I had many pairs of but they stalled me out of caring
smooth shoe tho
I like em a lot, they remind me of the court forces which I had many pairs of but they stalled me out of caring
smooth shoe tho
- Jul 28, 2004
- 859
- 864
Pants are GStar cargo pants. Laces are a spare pair from the Union Jordan II.
- Jul 28, 2004
- 859
- 864
Laces are a spare pair from the Union Jordan II
- Jul 28, 2004
- 859
- 864
Post in thread 'Nike Mac Attack - McEnroes forgotten gem'
https://niketalk.com/threads/nike-mac-attack-mcenroes-forgotten-gem.667438/post-36683448
Another shot
- Sep 28, 2004
- 13,926
- 5,907
I’ve dealt with worse so maybe I’m just content (as odd as that sounds). The pleather air trainers were never truly comfortable. The uppers on these are seemingly so soft and after two wears, they aren’t uncomfortable even if my feet are exploding out of the sides a bit.
Comparing the outsole foot bases of these and an air trainer 1, there’s a solid 1/4 inch difference. I’m not dismissing those having legit issues with these.
I’ve never been one to need anything other than the standard D sizing. I have family members wearing 2E and 4Es consistently
For casual wear, I probably won’t have any issues wearing these into the ground. I’m not buying more than 3 pairs a year now so I could see if you had 25 other pairs to choose from for a daily wearer how these would be a low priority. The leather softness alone for me has me dealing with the other flaws.
Sometimes I wonder if people forget how bad we had it with retros for years and years. If these were narrow and pleather, itd be a trash release flat out. But for me, I can deal with the flaws with a nice upper
