- 8,649
- 21
u would get wrecked im sorry.Originally Posted by CrunkJuicedUp
il go out to north Korea and take out 20 of them %++%* if they even try 2 touch American soil let alone bomb it
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
u would get wrecked im sorry.Originally Posted by CrunkJuicedUp
il go out to north Korea and take out 20 of them %++%* if they even try 2 touch American soil let alone bomb it
Originally Posted by MILLION DOLLAR STACKS
u would get wrecked im sorry.Originally Posted by CrunkJuicedUp
il go out to north Korea and take out 20 of them %++%* if they even try 2 touch American soil let alone bomb it
Originally Posted by Sorkoram
They are not a threat.
I'll say this again, they DO NOT want us to flex our military muscle, especially if it involves the Pacific fleet.
We have close to (since they did raise the threat awareness level)30,000 troops,�not to mention�allied forces�in Korea as it is.
The capabilities we have to destroy�NK in�under a half hour, are tremendous, to say the least.
Only eyebrow I'd raise would be at North Korea's allies and it still wouldn't be enough.
We have the edge in :
- Air Combat ( If they want to inflict harm, they'd have to do it from the air attacking our Air Force and Navy, and they do not have those capabilities)
- Naval Combat - We could mobilize quickly and pound them from a distance (pause)
- Ground Forces/Land Capabilities�(sure numbers)
- Not too mention new capabilities from NORAD ( that missile would be shot down period, if deemed harmful)
and the biggest factor
- Resources -> North Korea's people are living in hell, they simply do not have the resources to go the mile with the U.S. (alone)
Think Operation Shock and Awe�
even if N. Korea did fire a missiles, i wouldn't worry much ...the US has anti-missiles located in Okinawa, Hawaii and California ...Originally Posted by Sorkoram
The same factors that make it sketchy to us, are the same factors that doom North Korea. I'm quite sure we already know their capabilities and everything that they our doing, courtesy of satellites and stealth fighters/bombers/drones. As stated, we can't be the aggressor, it'd look bad on our image abroad and this administration does not want anything of the sort happening.
We are solely dependent upon the actions they take.
- They fire a missile, we act. They do not fire, we wait.
Rules of Engagement come into play heavily with this situation.
Originally Posted by Sorkoram
They are not a threat.
I'll say this again, they DO NOT want us to flex our military muscle, especially if it involves the Pacific fleet.
We have close to (since they did raise the threat awareness level)30,000 troops,�not to mention�allied forces�in Korea as it is.
The capabilities we have to destroy�NK in�under a half hour, are tremendous, to say the least.
Only eyebrow I'd raise would be at North Korea's allies and it still wouldn't be enough.
We have the edge in :
- Air Combat ( If they want to inflict harm, they'd have to do it from the air attacking our Air Force and Navy, and they do not have those capabilities)
- Naval Combat - We could mobilize quickly and pound them from a distance (pause)
- Ground Forces/Land Capabilities�(sure numbers)
- Not too mention new capabilities from NORAD ( that missile would be shot down period, if deemed harmful)
and the biggest factor
- Resources -> North Korea's people are living in hell, they simply do not have the resources to go the mile with the U.S. (alone)
Think Operation Shock and Awe�
Originally Posted by i3allistic
even if N. Korea did fire a missiles, i wouldn't worry much ...the US has anti-missiles located in Okinawa, Hawaii and California ...Originally Posted by Sorkoram
The same factors that make it sketchy to us, are the same factors that doom North Korea. I'm quite sure we already know their capabilities and everything that they our doing, courtesy of satellites and stealth fighters/bombers/drones. As stated, we can't be the aggressor, it'd look bad on our image abroad and this administration does not want anything of the sort happening.
We are solely dependent upon the actions they take.
- They fire a missile, we act. They do not fire, we wait.
Rules of Engagement come into play heavily with this situation.
Plus them Marines boys are station in Okinawa which is just a few hours away from N. Korea
Originally Posted by Sorkoram
If Kim doesn't back down, then we have no choice but to put him in his place and in that case, our military muscle would be flexed.Originally Posted by swyftdahoe
^ Man.. You're thinking North Korea wants war.. I'm thinking they're suicide bombers.. Do something crazy but not too crazy to get more at the bargaining table.. Crazy bastards..
We could blow his Nuclear Operations off the map, this should be understood, but the United States does not want to engange in any conflict(as the President has said before). We'd engage if we felt threatened or felt as if any one of our allies or floating sovereigns was under duress. The United States doesn't need or wish to engage in any nuclear offensive against North Korea. The only way we attack is if they attack first and that's where we sit at the moment. If we act before they act, then we are the agressor and the image we are looking to push to our foreign counterparts, is wiped away with an order of "fire at will".
Different terrain, different enemy. Things get shady in Iraq or Afghanistan when you do not know who's friend or foe (even the children)Originally Posted by sn00pee
almost seemed like the same thing they said about Iraq/Afghanistan/al queda. But yet we still seem to be struggling in those areas...
As one of the guys above me said, Al Queda has suicide bombers and pledge their lives to murder in the name of their believed cause. We have seen what North Korea looks like from within and out, once calling for sanctions, due to their poverty and lack of resources their citizens have.
Afghanistan is a mountain terrain and it makes it tough to transport and treck into. Hike in the mountains with about 60lbs of gear on. It's just an entire different ballgame there with the logistics and strategies that must be employed.
North Korea is just north of an allie and is surrounded by water. It'd be tough for them to defend all sides with absolute efficiency. Strategically, they've already lost.
Originally Posted by PrurientSole
Does anyone really take North Korea seriously?
To me, North Korea is the drunk guy at a club who's talking reckless towards the bouncer, America.
His two friends, Russia and China, are trying to hold him back, but, once he crosses the line and throws a punch, it's curtains.
Kim Jong can't be so stupid as to launch a missle at the US. He just can't be.
He's nothing more than a whiny little #$*#% who wants attention.