- 7,359
- 28,910
- Joined
- Dec 8, 1999
You know full well what the problem was. I suspect everyone here does. That's why there's complaining. "NT's soft because you can't trans-bash now wah wah wah!!"we're asking publicly for TRANSPARENCY
your answers are really vague when it comes to the Jenner thread..... you say it was "obvious" yet no one knows
Look at the topic post in the Jenner thread and tell me it was going to be respectful.
We allowed the other one because at least it was framed respectfully and had SOME respectful conversation. This one was doomed from the start.
We're supposed to allow hundreds of trans-bashing replies to allow for the possibility that someone might have a mature and respectful discussion?If someone wants to be immature let them be immature.
They will get ignored and eventually a discussion will come up about a topic that is in the media.
No.
Take the icloud hacking story. That's a "topic that is in the media." Can our members handle it? No, unfortunately. They can't.
Literally THOUSANDS of posts are added to our forums each day. It's a triage situation. You don't let threads with a chance die because you're spending six hours performing CPR on a corpse.
It took probably 20 minutes to go through and clean up the "Fools Wildin" thread today. That's a thread many of you enjoy. I could've locked that one and spent an hour trying to clean up the Caitlyn Jenner thread. Would you have preferred that?
We have finite resources at our disposal here.