- 3,848
- 1,903
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2011
Good luck to you. I might be on the other side tonight. Since 95' double digit home underdogs are 63-31.
***$$$-NT Sportsbook Thread vol.2- Props props props props props props... EVERYBODY!
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by bijald0331,
- Start date
- 29,014
- 4,130
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2004
I been on +10 pt dogs all year but I wont touch the Raiders tonight... This game will be left alone or it will be a 1 unit bet on Denver.
- 755
- 121
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2012
Denver-6.5
Nyk over 97.
I have a bunch of pleasers in play. If I win one of my pleasers I'll buy someone a beer.
Nyk over 97.
I have a bunch of pleasers in play. If I win one of my pleasers I'll buy someone a beer.
Last edited:
- 6,113
- 159
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2005
I get that point of view completely. But the Raiders are allowing 35 plus in the past five games and the Broncos D is even better now than it was when they played week 4. I see a huge blow out their last three home games have them giving up 90pts so I don't see a home field advantage playing into this one.
I just hope I'm right. GL to all who are putting up tonight!
- 8,859
- 577
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2007
i agree.
that stat is nice, but the raiders are just down right terrible. Sometimes you just have to go with the (much) better team, and can't go solely off of stats/trends.
that stat is nice, but the raiders are just down right terrible. Sometimes you just have to go with the (much) better team, and can't go solely off of stats/trends.
do work son
Banned
- 17,118
- 5,186
- Joined
- May 22, 2010
the chiefs were supposed to be really bad and the broncos should have easily covered that 10 pt spread too 
i still think the broncos end up covering though
i still think the broncos end up covering though
- 6,113
- 159
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2005
the chiefs were supposed to be really bad and the broncos should have easily covered that 10 pt spread too
i still think the broncos end up covering though
But during this 7 game win streak the only time they didn't cover was against the Chiefs... But I get what you mean.
My gut feeling says Denver will cover easily. I hope and pray I get this parlay, that would be a nice big payday. (for a player of my monetary stature of course)
- 1,582
- 1,212
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2008
leaning towards Oak and the under.
No matter how bad the Raiders are I just dont see them being blown out twice in a season by the division rival Broncos.
No matter how bad the Raiders are I just dont see them being blown out twice in a season by the division rival Broncos.
- 755
- 121
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2012
this. Plus home teams play well on Thursday's. I believe they're undefeated?? How y'all feel about rhode Island beating providence and NYK over 97 vs Miami?!?
- 9,516
- 3,730
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2009
This might sound ridiculous but have you guys ever bet on the same game twice, 2 different bets plus the over/under on each?
You're guaranteed to lose but the bet you do win would make up for the lost and more right?
You're guaranteed to lose but the bet you do win would make up for the lost and more right?
- 166
- 112
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2012
So (using tonights game as an example), you are saying you would put in two parlays. One being (lets say) the Broncos and the over, and the other being the Broncos and the under?
This would result in (assuming normal juice with $100 bets), winning $260, and losing $100 with a net of +$160.
Yes, it would work assuming the one team that you like actually wins the game. If not, you just lost two bets on the same team.
- 1,582
- 1,212
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2008
not ridiculous at all. My pops does it. He just makes sure he feels 100% about whichever pick he puts on both parlays.
- 58,324
- 29,808
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2005
All the time. My last two hits on a two play parlay were both on the same game. Just last Monday I had The Eagles +10.5 and the over of 50.
- 9,516
- 3,730
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2009
That's exactly what I meant.
I expected to get roasted for this.
I'm tired of losing money and I know the 'house always wins' but I'm going to use this as a work around. I am aware of the risk I'm taking if the team I pick does not win but that's the risk we take right?! .. I'm taking Denver and doing 2 parlays for that game. I'm also going to do one for the Heat/Knicks game tonight.
- 3,848
- 1,903
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2011
Play for Today (3-0 since 11/30):
Nebraska +7
Keeping track of what I post here from now on.
Nebraska +7
Keeping track of what I post here from now on.
Last edited:
- 28,059
- 9,181
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2007
I think you misinterpreted what DaBottom meant. He is saying two parlays, same team, but one with the over and one with the under.
So to use your example he is saying he would place two parlays: 1) Eagles +10.5/Over 50 and 2) Eagles +10.5/Under 50
- 58,324
- 29,808
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2005
Oh. Then no.
- 3,133
- 507
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2012
Denver -10 and -10.5 looks like the sucker bet of the week
Everyone on it,
I would never lay 10 with a team on a short week, on the ROAD, and against a divisional foe
Raiders +10.5 big for me...sprinkling a little on the ML as well
Everyone on it,
I would never lay 10 with a team on a short week, on the ROAD, and against a divisional foe
Raiders +10.5 big for me...sprinkling a little on the ML as well
- 58,324
- 29,808
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2005
Yeah. 10.5 is a huge number. No play from me.
- 6,113
- 159
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2005
651 and Quell... You guys are making me worry now haha. Especially coming from two guys who's opinions I actually value.
Well, we will see... Good luck to all and i'll be back at some point tonight.
Well, we will see... Good luck to all and i'll be back at some point tonight.
jpzx
Supporter
- 57,518
- 27,213
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2008
Won $500 yesterday on a parlay and also Gonzaga moneyline for the second half.
Want to bet tonight. Twitchin
Want to bet tonight. Twitchin
- 3,848
- 1,903
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2011
^If it makes you feel better, Bill Simmons is on the Broncos.
I heard he's a pretty good capper.
I heard he's a pretty good capper.
- 3,133
- 507
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2012
I like URI to cover the spread, but it's tricky with all the injuries surrounding PC
Who really knows how hurt Cotton is...and those boys play UNBELIEVABLY hard for Cooley - and it's at the Dunk (debating whether or not to go at the moment)
Gun to head give me URI on the spread and small ML, but incredibly small...so small that it's not worth betting
Last edited:
- 916
- 125
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2012
go saga 2nd half ml? Was that -5000 ? I got wash state +8.5Won $500 yesterday on a parlay and also Gonzaga moneyline for the second half.
Want to bet tonight. Twitchin
- 3,133
- 507
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2012
I don't think you're reading his question right...are you? Or am I the one reading it wrong??
Nobody should be doing something like this, which is what I think he's asking,
Raiders +10.5 and Over 48 ...100 to win 260
Raiders +10.5 and Under 48 ... 100 to win 260
Is this what you're asking DaBottom?
House will nevvvvvvvvver give you an edge bro
Last edited:
