Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
[/h3][h3]James' ballhandling[/h3]
12:32PM ET
Despite the fact the Heat have Mario Chalmers and Carlos Arroyo at PG, many have speculated this summer that LeBron James and Dwyane Wade will be the ones doing the majority of the ballhandling for the Heat this season.
And in the first game of the season Tuesday night in a loss against Boston, the speculation played to form.
Via ESPN Stats & Info, James brought the ball up 37 times, Wade 21 times, Arroyo 14 times and Eddie House one time.
So will James continue to lead by such a large margin? Hard to say after just one game. But it's likely it won't always be this way.
Tuesday night, James was about the only offensive weapon the Heat had going, so they rode him for the majority of the second half. Wade and others won't always be so cold from the field.
Yet, as ESPN's Tom Haberstroh wrote after the game, James dominating the ballhandling duties certainly has its benefits:
--- Ryan Corazza
[h5]ESPN's Tom Haberstroh[/h5]
James' selfishness creates unselfishness
"The key for the Heat and James going forward will be to appreciate that his selfishness actually unleashes his playmaking abilities. When James attacks the basket, he lures the attention of the opponents and forces them to collapse. And that's when LeBron's unselfish gene kicks in and his court awareness leads to the open man. In many ways, LeBron's selfishness breeds the unselfishness that will lift his teammates to new heights. But give the Celtics defense credit. Boston's strategy was unmistakable from the opening tip: pack it in and coerce LeBron James to settle for a half-decent shot on the perimeter."
"From the time D'Antoni blew his first practice whistle until the final preseason game Friday against the Raptors, Fields showed a nonstop motor, quickness to get into the paint area and even a steady three-point shot. Although in the last two games he was 50% from downtown, that's the one area on offense he'll need to work on because he'll be getting open looks from the wing and baseline corner while Raymond Felton and Amare Stoudemire run the pick-and-roll and draw defenders. While Chandler was thought to have been the team's clear choice at the starting two, he's been a step slow in the preseason, perhaps still feeling the effects from an offseason calf injury and sports hernia surgery. And while Walker had a decent percentage from downtown during the preseason (41.7%), he hasn't shown much else in his game. If Azubuike was healthy, he'd most likely get the call to start (Wednesday night) for his slashing, shooting and defensive abilities, but he's not, so D'Antoni decided to go with Fields. Although Fields won't be a double-figure scoring threat right away, he'll be all over the court on defense, diving for loose balls, and he'll bring a faster pace and constant attack mode to the Knicks' first unit on offense, which will especially help them make plays collectively in halfcourt sets. So far, it's been all Stoudemire. Overall, Fields has a chance to be the Knick' version of Matt Barnes -- he's also 6'7", just 16 pounds bigger -- who in the past two years has earned a reputation for making big baskets and defensive stops in the playoffs for the Suns and Magic, respectively."
"Phoenix is another point guard-driven franchise and is fresh off a trip to the Western Conference finals, but it faces a slew of questions after a head-scratching offseason that left the Suns a few bodies short up front and minus the spectacular finishing talents of Stoudemire. (As Suns coach Alvin Gentry pointedly told me before the Phoenix-Portland game Tuesday night, Stoudemire is the best dive man in the league on the pick-and-roll and there's no way Hakim Warrick or anybody else is replacing what he did.) The Suns went 2-6 in preseason, with losses by 21, 38 and 51 points, and the scary thing is that the seven-seconds-or-less attack cleared 100 points only once in eight tries -- in the game they lost by 38. The fact they left Portland with only 92, including a meager 11 in the fourth quarter, offers further evidence that the league's best offense every year for the past half-decade may emphatically cede that crown this season ... Nash loves the desert and certainly benefits from the Suns' world-class training staff, but how much longer does he endure the penny-pinching ownership and the fact that the final years of his prime will be spent scratching and clawing to get the No. 8 seed in the West? All his interviews sound like he's trying to talk himself into optimism through gritted teeth, but the reality is that his owner nuked a team (and front office) that was two wins from the Finals and, if he stays put, Nash and Co. are probably going to the lottery. Even if Nash doesn't push for a trade, what sense does it make for the Suns to hang on to him (and Hill, for that matter) if they're bumbling along toward 32-50? Wouldn't it be more prudent at that point to trade their four 30-something starters and rebuild?"
"Afflalo makes for a decent stopgap because of his defense, but if he's going to be a viable long-term starter, he has to make a greater impact at the offensive end. Fortunately, there's a path to doing so that he already embarked upon last season: becoming a 3-point specialist. Afflalo hit 43.4 percent of his 3s, his second straight season at better than 40 percent. Clearly he can stroke it. The problem is he regularly steps inside the arc -- only 43 percent of his shots were 3s. Usually for a specialist with this kind of accuracy, it will be well more than half. Afflalo isn't being asked to create shots off the dribble or anything; in fact, he had the fourth-lowest Usage Rate at his position. He's just choosing to step in off the catch too often, and it's the wrong choice. He has to be a high-efficiency 3-point sniper in this role. If he's ducking in to shoot 2s or drive to the basket, he's not nearly as great a threat."
"The nice thing about crash-landing at the bottom of the standings is that it will only get better from here. The Nets didn't achieve the Plan A of nabbing LeBron James and starting a dramatic overnight recovery, but they should start returning to respectability this season. Harris is likely to play better than he did a year ago, Lopez is a rising star in the post and the forwards are about a thousand times better than last season's peanut gallery. Plus, Avery Johnson should prove helpful, at least on the sideline. He's coached Harris before, and while that relationship was rocky at times, he knows how to use him to good effect. Johnson also is likely to demand much more from Devin Harris and Lopez at the defensive end -- since both of them loafed on D a year ago. Nonetheless, this won't be an overnight recovery. The Nets can expect nightly beatings in front of puny crowds in their first season in Newark. However, the Nets can take solace in the fact that somebody else will be this year's NBA doormat, while they become one of the rare teams to double their win total from the year before."
Wednesday is opening night for most of the NBA, and we've been talking about the league's big questions for most of the summer -- questions like where Carmelo Anthony goes, how Kobe's knee feels and whether the Heat's Big Three can coalesce into a superteam.
But dig under the surface and we can find some bigger, broader questions that, in total, may have a bigger impact on how the 2010-11 season looks than the three items above.
[h3]1. Are we in for some surprises? [/h3]
Or to put it another way, is Memphis any good? As our Tom Haberstroh noted recently, teams that roll through the preseason tend to keep up the happy mojo once the real games start. All but one of the past 17 teams to finish exhibition play with one loss or fewer went on to make the playoffs.
This season three teams -- Memphis, Utah and Orlando -- fit that profile, with all three running the table in the preseason. That Utah and Orlando might be playoff-caliber teams isn't exactly breaking news, but the Grizzlies staying at that level would be. I projected them to win 36 games, and only one of our prognosticators, the intrepid Chris Sheridan, pegged Memphis as a playoff team.
Based on their preseason, however, I'm thinking something in the low-to-mid-40s might be more appropriate. The bench looks vastly improved, the commitment to defense looks a bit more serious and Mike Conley had a strong preseason at the point. I still don't trust the ownership of Michael Heisley or the leadership of Zach Randolph, but the Griz may nonetheless win more than they lose.
The Grizzlies aren't the only potential surprise based on preseason results. Minnesota and Cleveland both went 6-2, which would be an absolute shocker if it carried over to the regular season. I'm more skeptical of those teams' chances of doing anything substantial, but at the very least they may not be the bottom-feeders that most of us predicted them to be.
Of course, if one team goes up another must come down. I suspect those teams are Phoenix and New Orleans, both of whom looked absolutely dreadful in the preseason -- they went a combined 3-13 and each had a loss by more than 50 points.
Scouts tell me that Chris Paul looks out of shape, which is a huge red flag for the Hornets; I picked them to win 45 games based largely on Paul's brilliance, but if he can't play at an MVP level they're going to land miles short of that mark. The rest of the roster, even with the recent addition of Jerryd Bayless, simply isn't equipped to contend for the playoffs unless Paul dominates.
Phoenix is another point guard-driven franchise and is fresh off a trip to the Western Conference finals, but it faces a slew of questions after a head-scratching offseason that left the Suns a few bodies short up front and minus the spectacular finishing talents of Amare Stoudemire. (As Suns coach Alvin Gentry pointedly told me before the Phoenix-Portland game Tuesday night, Stoudemire is the best dive man in the league on the pick-and-roll and there's no way Hakim Warrick or anybody else is replacing what he did.)
The Suns went 2-6 in preseason, with losses by 21, 38 and 51 points, and the scary thing is that the seven-seconds-or-less attack cleared 100 points only once in eight tries -- in the game they lost by 38. The fact they left Portland with only 92, including a meager 11 in the fourth quarter, offers further evidence that the league's best offense every year for the past half-decade may emphatically cede that crown this season.
[h3]2. Are we selling the field short?[/h3]
Virtually every set of predictions lists one of three teams as champion: the Lakers, Heat or Celtics. I'm wondering if this consensus is missing the boat on reality, and I'm not just saying that because the Heat and Lakers looked somewhere south of dominant Tuesday night.
http:///sports.espn.go.com/espn/gallery/enlargePhoto?id=5732578&story=5732481">http://sports.espn.go.com...732578&...idth=440,height=750,scrollbars=no,noresize'); return false;" href="http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/insider/columns/story?columnist=hollinger_john&page=PERDiem-101027#">[+] Enlarge
Fernando Medina/NBAE/Getty ImagesDon't sleep on D-12 and the Magic.
In light of the fact that Orlando dominated the preseason after dominating the second half of last season, I find it particularly hard to swallow how dismissive most people seem of the Magic's chances.
Apparently lots of people saw last year's Eastern Conference finals and decided the Magic can't be trusted in the playoffs ... which might be a better argument if they hadn't won the East a year earlier (with Rafer Alston playing point guard, for Pete's sake). If the effects of Dwight Howard-stopper Kendrick Perkins' knee injury linger into the postseason, the Magic might be able to outlast Boston in a potential meeting. Alternatively, they may not need to play the Celtics at all.
And then there's the wild card: trades. Remember, you don't win with your November roster; you win with the roster you take into the playoffs. Look at the top teams and at which ones have the assets to make major upgrades between now and the trade deadline, and you'll quickly notice that it's not the Lakers, Celtics and Heat who are holding the cards.
Teams such as Portland, Oklahoma City, Houston and Orlando sit on major asset troves, which could enable them to make the necessary upgrades and roster tweaks to push them up another level. You don't think Orlando becomes a favorite if it can use its assets to pry Paul from New Orleans?
And out West, the Rockets, Blazers and Thunder all are sitting on mouth-watering combinations of young players, draft picks and expiring contracts, just waiting for the right player to become available. Between L.A.'s wobbly knees and the potential for those three clubs to considerably upgrade their rosters over the course of the season, I'm wondering if the Western Conference in particular will end up being far more interesting than we've been led to believe.
[h3]3. Are CP3 and Melo the tip of the iceberg? [/h3]
We've spilled countless gallons of (virtual) ink speculating on the possibilities of Chris Paul or Carmelo Anthony changing teams, and with good reason.
But all that speculation has blinded us to the other possibilities that may come to the fore this season, especially as other potential contenders find themselves falling short of expectations.
I'll lead with Exhibit A: Steve Nash. He loves the desert and certainly benefits from the Suns' world-class training staff, but how much longer does he endure the penny-pinching ownership and the fact that the final years of his prime will be spent scratching and clawing to get the No. 8 seed in the West? All his interviews sound like he's trying to talk himself into optimism through gritted teeth, but the reality is that his owner nuked a team (and front office) that was two wins from the Finals and, if he stays put, Nash and Co. are probably going to the lottery.
Even if Nash doesn't push for a trade, what sense does it make for the Suns to hang on to him (and Grant Hill, for that matter) if they're bumbling along toward 32-50? Wouldn't it be more prudent at that point to trade their four 30-something starters and rebuild?
Nash isn't the only example. Is Zach Randolph content to stay in Memphis during his walk year without an extension? Does Jamal Crawford push harder for a trade if his deal isn't extended but Al Horford's is? Does Devin Harris want to stick around in New Jersey with a coach that dealt him once and tried to a second time? And if either Dallas or San Antonio doesn't live up to expectations with veteran rosters, well, who wouldn't be available from those teams?
Finally, once the dominoes start falling, other pieces come into play. If the Nuggets deal Anthony, is there any point in their hanging on to Chauncey Billups? If the Hornets trade Paul, doesn't it also make sense to deal free-agent-to-be David West? And if the Suns blow it up with a Nash trade, wouldn't Jason Richardson become available too?
[h3]4. How will the lockout affect the NBA, here and now?[/h3]
Everyone around the league is talking about the potential lockout in the summer of 2011. But almost nobody is talking about the implications of a potential lockout on the 2010-11 season -- impacts that will be felt regardless of whether a lockout actually happens.
http:///sports.espn.go.com/espn/gallery/enlargePhoto?id=5732606&story=5732481">http://sports.espn.go.com...732606&...idth=640,height=550,scrollbars=no,noresize'); return false;" href="http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/insider/columns/story?columnist=hollinger_john&page=PERDiem-101027#">[+] Enlarge
Brian Bahr/Getty ImagesNegotiations between David Stern and the players union could impact teams' moves this season.
For instance, a draft pick in 2011 is now worth a lot less than one in 2012, because it's likely many of the good underclassmen will be unwilling to give up a year of college ball just so they can sit in the freezer for a year (or part of one) during a lockout, and their decision window will likely come long before a new labor agreement. That, perhaps, is one reason the pick the Blazers got from New Orleans this week is only top-7 protected in 2011 -- that might prove to be like a top-13 protection in any other year.
Another impact is that it might be easier for some players to pass on signing extensions if they can possibly go to Europe and earn some dough while the rest of the league is locked out. Along the same lines, it might make it more palatable for other players to exercise opt-outs before June 30, knowing it gives them more flexibility to earn a paycheck elsewhere. This, again, will be the case regardless of whether we have an actual work stoppage -- the effects will be felt even if the cause never takes place.
And we've already seen the first impact. All that crazy money we saw spent this past summer happened, in part, because several teams seemed to be pricing a lockout into their expectations, anticipating that they wouldn't need to meet their 2011-12 payroll commitments in full, and anticipating that a rollback is a possible provision of any settlement.
[h3]5. Who steps up the D?[/h3]
During most of NBA history, defense hasn't been a particularly large determinant of championships -- great offensive teams have won about as often as great defensive clubs. The last few years, however, have skewed badly in favor of the defense.
Boston won the title in 2008 with a shockingly effective defense, one that was far better than one would have presumed given the results of their individual players heading into that season. The Lakers, in turn, realized they had to turn their own D up a notch after advancing to the Finals as largely an offensive team in 2008; by last year, their defense was several notches ahead of the offense in the league tables. Orlando belongs on that list too, after the Magic won five playoff series in two years on the back of two-time Defensive Player of the Year Dwight Howard.
But the examples of Boston and L.A. intrigue me more because they were so indicative of an extraordinary team-wide focus on that end of the floor.
This season, one wonders if the Heat can replicate the same commitment the Celtics showed in 2008. Certainly Miami has the organization and coaching staff to pull it off -- coach Erik Spoelstra, a disciple of team president Pat Riley, cajoled a limited Heat squad into the fourth-best defense a year ago.
But a better question, perhaps, is what conditions would be needed for us to get a surprise entrant into the league's elite Lakers-Celtics-Heat-Magic quartet. As noted above, I'm looking more carefully at the "field" this year than most, and I'm suspecting a meteoric rise in Defensive Efficiency would be a likely cause of any ascent to the elite foursome's level.
If so, as with the Lakers and Celtics, it's going to be as much a result of esprit de corps as of individual talent. Several teams, on paper, could do such a thing. We won't find out until the games tip off, though -- a statement that applies to virtually every question we've had this offseason.
So enough of the guessing, already.
For the 22 teams playing their opening games tonight, it's time to tip this thing off and find out.
[/h3][h3]James' ballhandling[/h3]
12:32PM ET
Despite the fact the Heat have Mario Chalmers and Carlos Arroyo at PG, many have speculated this summer that LeBron James and Dwyane Wade will be the ones doing the majority of the ballhandling for the Heat this season.
And in the first game of the season Tuesday night in a loss against Boston, the speculation played to form.
Via ESPN Stats & Info, James brought the ball up 37 times, Wade 21 times, Arroyo 14 times and Eddie House one time.
So will James continue to lead by such a large margin? Hard to say after just one game. But it's likely it won't always be this way.
Tuesday night, James was about the only offensive weapon the Heat had going, so they rode him for the majority of the second half. Wade and others won't always be so cold from the field.
Yet, as ESPN's Tom Haberstroh wrote after the game, James dominating the ballhandling duties certainly has its benefits:
--- Ryan Corazza
[h5]ESPN's Tom Haberstroh[/h5]
James' selfishness creates unselfishness
"The key for the Heat and James going forward will be to appreciate that his selfishness actually unleashes his playmaking abilities. When James attacks the basket, he lures the attention of the opponents and forces them to collapse. And that's when LeBron's unselfish gene kicks in and his court awareness leads to the open man. In many ways, LeBron's selfishness breeds the unselfishness that will lift his teammates to new heights. But give the Celtics defense credit. Boston's strategy was unmistakable from the opening tip: pack it in and coerce LeBron James to settle for a half-decent shot on the perimeter."
"From the time D'Antoni blew his first practice whistle until the final preseason game Friday against the Raptors, Fields showed a nonstop motor, quickness to get into the paint area and even a steady three-point shot. Although in the last two games he was 50% from downtown, that's the one area on offense he'll need to work on because he'll be getting open looks from the wing and baseline corner while Raymond Felton and Amare Stoudemire run the pick-and-roll and draw defenders. While Chandler was thought to have been the team's clear choice at the starting two, he's been a step slow in the preseason, perhaps still feeling the effects from an offseason calf injury and sports hernia surgery. And while Walker had a decent percentage from downtown during the preseason (41.7%), he hasn't shown much else in his game. If Azubuike was healthy, he'd most likely get the call to start (Wednesday night) for his slashing, shooting and defensive abilities, but he's not, so D'Antoni decided to go with Fields. Although Fields won't be a double-figure scoring threat right away, he'll be all over the court on defense, diving for loose balls, and he'll bring a faster pace and constant attack mode to the Knicks' first unit on offense, which will especially help them make plays collectively in halfcourt sets. So far, it's been all Stoudemire. Overall, Fields has a chance to be the Knick' version of Matt Barnes -- he's also 6'7", just 16 pounds bigger -- who in the past two years has earned a reputation for making big baskets and defensive stops in the playoffs for the Suns and Magic, respectively."
"Phoenix is another point guard-driven franchise and is fresh off a trip to the Western Conference finals, but it faces a slew of questions after a head-scratching offseason that left the Suns a few bodies short up front and minus the spectacular finishing talents of Stoudemire. (As Suns coach Alvin Gentry pointedly told me before the Phoenix-Portland game Tuesday night, Stoudemire is the best dive man in the league on the pick-and-roll and there's no way Hakim Warrick or anybody else is replacing what he did.) The Suns went 2-6 in preseason, with losses by 21, 38 and 51 points, and the scary thing is that the seven-seconds-or-less attack cleared 100 points only once in eight tries -- in the game they lost by 38. The fact they left Portland with only 92, including a meager 11 in the fourth quarter, offers further evidence that the league's best offense every year for the past half-decade may emphatically cede that crown this season ... Nash loves the desert and certainly benefits from the Suns' world-class training staff, but how much longer does he endure the penny-pinching ownership and the fact that the final years of his prime will be spent scratching and clawing to get the No. 8 seed in the West? All his interviews sound like he's trying to talk himself into optimism through gritted teeth, but the reality is that his owner nuked a team (and front office) that was two wins from the Finals and, if he stays put, Nash and Co. are probably going to the lottery. Even if Nash doesn't push for a trade, what sense does it make for the Suns to hang on to him (and Hill, for that matter) if they're bumbling along toward 32-50? Wouldn't it be more prudent at that point to trade their four 30-something starters and rebuild?"
"Afflalo makes for a decent stopgap because of his defense, but if he's going to be a viable long-term starter, he has to make a greater impact at the offensive end. Fortunately, there's a path to doing so that he already embarked upon last season: becoming a 3-point specialist. Afflalo hit 43.4 percent of his 3s, his second straight season at better than 40 percent. Clearly he can stroke it. The problem is he regularly steps inside the arc -- only 43 percent of his shots were 3s. Usually for a specialist with this kind of accuracy, it will be well more than half. Afflalo isn't being asked to create shots off the dribble or anything; in fact, he had the fourth-lowest Usage Rate at his position. He's just choosing to step in off the catch too often, and it's the wrong choice. He has to be a high-efficiency 3-point sniper in this role. If he's ducking in to shoot 2s or drive to the basket, he's not nearly as great a threat."
"The nice thing about crash-landing at the bottom of the standings is that it will only get better from here. The Nets didn't achieve the Plan A of nabbing LeBron James and starting a dramatic overnight recovery, but they should start returning to respectability this season. Harris is likely to play better than he did a year ago, Lopez is a rising star in the post and the forwards are about a thousand times better than last season's peanut gallery. Plus, Avery Johnson should prove helpful, at least on the sideline. He's coached Harris before, and while that relationship was rocky at times, he knows how to use him to good effect. Johnson also is likely to demand much more from Devin Harris and Lopez at the defensive end -- since both of them loafed on D a year ago. Nonetheless, this won't be an overnight recovery. The Nets can expect nightly beatings in front of puny crowds in their first season in Newark. However, the Nets can take solace in the fact that somebody else will be this year's NBA doormat, while they become one of the rare teams to double their win total from the year before."
Wednesday is opening night for most of the NBA, and we've been talking about the league's big questions for most of the summer -- questions like where Carmelo Anthony goes, how Kobe's knee feels and whether the Heat's Big Three can coalesce into a superteam.
But dig under the surface and we can find some bigger, broader questions that, in total, may have a bigger impact on how the 2010-11 season looks than the three items above.
[h3]1. Are we in for some surprises? [/h3]
Or to put it another way, is Memphis any good? As our Tom Haberstroh noted recently, teams that roll through the preseason tend to keep up the happy mojo once the real games start. All but one of the past 17 teams to finish exhibition play with one loss or fewer went on to make the playoffs.
This season three teams -- Memphis, Utah and Orlando -- fit that profile, with all three running the table in the preseason. That Utah and Orlando might be playoff-caliber teams isn't exactly breaking news, but the Grizzlies staying at that level would be. I projected them to win 36 games, and only one of our prognosticators, the intrepid Chris Sheridan, pegged Memphis as a playoff team.
Based on their preseason, however, I'm thinking something in the low-to-mid-40s might be more appropriate. The bench looks vastly improved, the commitment to defense looks a bit more serious and Mike Conley had a strong preseason at the point. I still don't trust the ownership of Michael Heisley or the leadership of Zach Randolph, but the Griz may nonetheless win more than they lose.
The Grizzlies aren't the only potential surprise based on preseason results. Minnesota and Cleveland both went 6-2, which would be an absolute shocker if it carried over to the regular season. I'm more skeptical of those teams' chances of doing anything substantial, but at the very least they may not be the bottom-feeders that most of us predicted them to be.
Of course, if one team goes up another must come down. I suspect those teams are Phoenix and New Orleans, both of whom looked absolutely dreadful in the preseason -- they went a combined 3-13 and each had a loss by more than 50 points.
Scouts tell me that Chris Paul looks out of shape, which is a huge red flag for the Hornets; I picked them to win 45 games based largely on Paul's brilliance, but if he can't play at an MVP level they're going to land miles short of that mark. The rest of the roster, even with the recent addition of Jerryd Bayless, simply isn't equipped to contend for the playoffs unless Paul dominates.
Phoenix is another point guard-driven franchise and is fresh off a trip to the Western Conference finals, but it faces a slew of questions after a head-scratching offseason that left the Suns a few bodies short up front and minus the spectacular finishing talents of Amare Stoudemire. (As Suns coach Alvin Gentry pointedly told me before the Phoenix-Portland game Tuesday night, Stoudemire is the best dive man in the league on the pick-and-roll and there's no way Hakim Warrick or anybody else is replacing what he did.)
The Suns went 2-6 in preseason, with losses by 21, 38 and 51 points, and the scary thing is that the seven-seconds-or-less attack cleared 100 points only once in eight tries -- in the game they lost by 38. The fact they left Portland with only 92, including a meager 11 in the fourth quarter, offers further evidence that the league's best offense every year for the past half-decade may emphatically cede that crown this season.
[h3]2. Are we selling the field short?[/h3]
Virtually every set of predictions lists one of three teams as champion: the Lakers, Heat or Celtics. I'm wondering if this consensus is missing the boat on reality, and I'm not just saying that because the Heat and Lakers looked somewhere south of dominant Tuesday night.
http:///sports.espn.go.com/espn/gallery/enlargePhoto?id=5732578&story=5732481">http://sports.espn.go.com...732578&...idth=440,height=750,scrollbars=no,noresize'); return false;" href="http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/insider/columns/story?columnist=hollinger_john&page=PERDiem-101027#">[+] Enlarge
Fernando Medina/NBAE/Getty ImagesDon't sleep on D-12 and the Magic.
In light of the fact that Orlando dominated the preseason after dominating the second half of last season, I find it particularly hard to swallow how dismissive most people seem of the Magic's chances.
Apparently lots of people saw last year's Eastern Conference finals and decided the Magic can't be trusted in the playoffs ... which might be a better argument if they hadn't won the East a year earlier (with Rafer Alston playing point guard, for Pete's sake). If the effects of Dwight Howard-stopper Kendrick Perkins' knee injury linger into the postseason, the Magic might be able to outlast Boston in a potential meeting. Alternatively, they may not need to play the Celtics at all.
And then there's the wild card: trades. Remember, you don't win with your November roster; you win with the roster you take into the playoffs. Look at the top teams and at which ones have the assets to make major upgrades between now and the trade deadline, and you'll quickly notice that it's not the Lakers, Celtics and Heat who are holding the cards.
Teams such as Portland, Oklahoma City, Houston and Orlando sit on major asset troves, which could enable them to make the necessary upgrades and roster tweaks to push them up another level. You don't think Orlando becomes a favorite if it can use its assets to pry Paul from New Orleans?
And out West, the Rockets, Blazers and Thunder all are sitting on mouth-watering combinations of young players, draft picks and expiring contracts, just waiting for the right player to become available. Between L.A.'s wobbly knees and the potential for those three clubs to considerably upgrade their rosters over the course of the season, I'm wondering if the Western Conference in particular will end up being far more interesting than we've been led to believe.
[h3]3. Are CP3 and Melo the tip of the iceberg? [/h3]
We've spilled countless gallons of (virtual) ink speculating on the possibilities of Chris Paul or Carmelo Anthony changing teams, and with good reason.
But all that speculation has blinded us to the other possibilities that may come to the fore this season, especially as other potential contenders find themselves falling short of expectations.
I'll lead with Exhibit A: Steve Nash. He loves the desert and certainly benefits from the Suns' world-class training staff, but how much longer does he endure the penny-pinching ownership and the fact that the final years of his prime will be spent scratching and clawing to get the No. 8 seed in the West? All his interviews sound like he's trying to talk himself into optimism through gritted teeth, but the reality is that his owner nuked a team (and front office) that was two wins from the Finals and, if he stays put, Nash and Co. are probably going to the lottery.
Even if Nash doesn't push for a trade, what sense does it make for the Suns to hang on to him (and Grant Hill, for that matter) if they're bumbling along toward 32-50? Wouldn't it be more prudent at that point to trade their four 30-something starters and rebuild?
Nash isn't the only example. Is Zach Randolph content to stay in Memphis during his walk year without an extension? Does Jamal Crawford push harder for a trade if his deal isn't extended but Al Horford's is? Does Devin Harris want to stick around in New Jersey with a coach that dealt him once and tried to a second time? And if either Dallas or San Antonio doesn't live up to expectations with veteran rosters, well, who wouldn't be available from those teams?
Finally, once the dominoes start falling, other pieces come into play. If the Nuggets deal Anthony, is there any point in their hanging on to Chauncey Billups? If the Hornets trade Paul, doesn't it also make sense to deal free-agent-to-be David West? And if the Suns blow it up with a Nash trade, wouldn't Jason Richardson become available too?
[h3]4. How will the lockout affect the NBA, here and now?[/h3]
Everyone around the league is talking about the potential lockout in the summer of 2011. But almost nobody is talking about the implications of a potential lockout on the 2010-11 season -- impacts that will be felt regardless of whether a lockout actually happens.
http:///sports.espn.go.com/espn/gallery/enlargePhoto?id=5732606&story=5732481">http://sports.espn.go.com...732606&...idth=640,height=550,scrollbars=no,noresize'); return false;" href="http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/insider/columns/story?columnist=hollinger_john&page=PERDiem-101027#">[+] Enlarge
Brian Bahr/Getty ImagesNegotiations between David Stern and the players union could impact teams' moves this season.
For instance, a draft pick in 2011 is now worth a lot less than one in 2012, because it's likely many of the good underclassmen will be unwilling to give up a year of college ball just so they can sit in the freezer for a year (or part of one) during a lockout, and their decision window will likely come long before a new labor agreement. That, perhaps, is one reason the pick the Blazers got from New Orleans this week is only top-7 protected in 2011 -- that might prove to be like a top-13 protection in any other year.
Another impact is that it might be easier for some players to pass on signing extensions if they can possibly go to Europe and earn some dough while the rest of the league is locked out. Along the same lines, it might make it more palatable for other players to exercise opt-outs before June 30, knowing it gives them more flexibility to earn a paycheck elsewhere. This, again, will be the case regardless of whether we have an actual work stoppage -- the effects will be felt even if the cause never takes place.
And we've already seen the first impact. All that crazy money we saw spent this past summer happened, in part, because several teams seemed to be pricing a lockout into their expectations, anticipating that they wouldn't need to meet their 2011-12 payroll commitments in full, and anticipating that a rollback is a possible provision of any settlement.
[h3]5. Who steps up the D?[/h3]
During most of NBA history, defense hasn't been a particularly large determinant of championships -- great offensive teams have won about as often as great defensive clubs. The last few years, however, have skewed badly in favor of the defense.
Boston won the title in 2008 with a shockingly effective defense, one that was far better than one would have presumed given the results of their individual players heading into that season. The Lakers, in turn, realized they had to turn their own D up a notch after advancing to the Finals as largely an offensive team in 2008; by last year, their defense was several notches ahead of the offense in the league tables. Orlando belongs on that list too, after the Magic won five playoff series in two years on the back of two-time Defensive Player of the Year Dwight Howard.
But the examples of Boston and L.A. intrigue me more because they were so indicative of an extraordinary team-wide focus on that end of the floor.
This season, one wonders if the Heat can replicate the same commitment the Celtics showed in 2008. Certainly Miami has the organization and coaching staff to pull it off -- coach Erik Spoelstra, a disciple of team president Pat Riley, cajoled a limited Heat squad into the fourth-best defense a year ago.
But a better question, perhaps, is what conditions would be needed for us to get a surprise entrant into the league's elite Lakers-Celtics-Heat-Magic quartet. As noted above, I'm looking more carefully at the "field" this year than most, and I'm suspecting a meteoric rise in Defensive Efficiency would be a likely cause of any ascent to the elite foursome's level.
If so, as with the Lakers and Celtics, it's going to be as much a result of esprit de corps as of individual talent. Several teams, on paper, could do such a thing. We won't find out until the games tip off, though -- a statement that applies to virtually every question we've had this offseason.
So enough of the guessing, already.
For the 22 teams playing their opening games tonight, it's time to tip this thing off and find out.
LeBron carries win-now burden with Heat
BOSTON – When LeBron James was running roughshod over the Cleveland Cavaliers, it became common for him to respond to tough coaching and differing degrees of conflict with the sheer shutdown mode. There goes LeBron, stomping off to the locker room with a staff member in hot pursuit to talk him back into practice. Come on back, King. We need you.
James would mope back onto the floor, reluctant to be told that someone disagreed with his belief on a matter. The Cavaliers’ culture of enabling, letting things go and go, exacerbated these issues. James stayed in a cocoon of perpetual adolescence.
“His coping skills,
LeBron carries win-now burden with Heat
BOSTON – When LeBron James was running roughshod over the Cleveland Cavaliers, it became common for him to respond to tough coaching and differing degrees of conflict with the sheer shutdown mode. There goes LeBron, stomping off to the locker room with a staff member in hot pursuit to talk him back into practice. Come on back, King. We need you.
James would mope back onto the floor, reluctant to be told that someone disagreed with his belief on a matter. The Cavaliers’ culture of enabling, letting things go and go, exacerbated these issues. James stayed in a cocoon of perpetual adolescence.
“His coping skills,
info???Originally Posted by NobleKane
this espn on xbox 360 is dope. unlike the nfl they actually show nba games on there and you can watch them whenever you want. watching euro league right now. whats the point of having english speaking for the broadcast when dudes accent is so heavy you cant even understand what he saying
info???Originally Posted by NobleKane
this espn on xbox 360 is dope. unlike the nfl they actually show nba games on there and you can watch them whenever you want. watching euro league right now. whats the point of having english speaking for the broadcast when dudes accent is so heavy you cant even understand what he saying
Deng and Rose improved their jumpshot. It seems as though LBJ has also.Originally Posted by Durden7
I see it. As a Celtics fan, I certainly see it.Originally Posted by CP1708
^
What mean, how so? That dude is uber talented, and has a MAJOR flaw in his game. Don't believe me, ask someone why Kobe had 15 rebounds in game 7. You don't think if kid had a lil bit of a jumper things mighta been different for them?
And to have that MAJOR flaw, and not fix it.That is sad to me, how can you not see that?
Im just wondering how he is able to fix it in an offseason? Hes always had this problem going back to college. Actually, hes a better shooter than he was years ago so he has made some progress. Hes just not a legitimate threat to shoot jumpers.
His season ended in the June. That gives him roughly 4 months to improve his jumpshot. There was prolly a total of a month of vacation/time off. Add in the weeks he spent with team USA and he most likely had 2 months maximum to learn to consistently shoot a jumpshot. Its just not possible to learn and perfect a skill in that short period of time.
He is what he is, and he wont improve his flaws by much over the years. Somethings can be improved in an offseason but something that requires so much skill and precision is difficult to master.
Deng and Rose improved their jumpshot. It seems as though LBJ has also.Originally Posted by Durden7
I see it. As a Celtics fan, I certainly see it.Originally Posted by CP1708
^
What mean, how so? That dude is uber talented, and has a MAJOR flaw in his game. Don't believe me, ask someone why Kobe had 15 rebounds in game 7. You don't think if kid had a lil bit of a jumper things mighta been different for them?
And to have that MAJOR flaw, and not fix it.That is sad to me, how can you not see that?
Im just wondering how he is able to fix it in an offseason? Hes always had this problem going back to college. Actually, hes a better shooter than he was years ago so he has made some progress. Hes just not a legitimate threat to shoot jumpers.
His season ended in the June. That gives him roughly 4 months to improve his jumpshot. There was prolly a total of a month of vacation/time off. Add in the weeks he spent with team USA and he most likely had 2 months maximum to learn to consistently shoot a jumpshot. Its just not possible to learn and perfect a skill in that short period of time.
He is what he is, and he wont improve his flaws by much over the years. Somethings can be improved in an offseason but something that requires so much skill and precision is difficult to master.
Don't see him matching up with Horford.Originally Posted by nicedudewithnicedreams
Why not Thabeet?