Pierce was able to make other players better. Melo.....
Pierce made his teammates so much better they didnt make the playoffs like his first 3 years with them. Melo.....
Knicks on their way to missing the playoffs for the 4th season in a row
If you wanna say Pierce > Melo fine I'm not gonna bother arguing that. If you say Pierce > Melo cuz he made his teammates better thats BS.
Nuggets never had a losing season with Melo on the squad. Can't say the same for the celtics and Pierce.
Is it cuz one of them made their teammates better while the other didnt?
Did Melo make his nuggets teammates better but couldnt make the Knicks into a perennial contender? Or is it that the nuggets made Melo better?
But then that would mean that his shortcomings in NY arent his fault which NT would never cosign.
Maybe he just stopped making people better? How do you even make someone better?