- 31,259
- 21,168
Fixed20 seasons until we byke tho
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Fixed20 seasons until we byke tho
Fans have this unrealistic idea of players should WANT TO, "Take the hardest road" to win a ring.
Why should they do that? Fans/Media tell players, "Your career is incomplete unless you win a ring." Why should they want to struggle for their entire careers HOPING to earn a ring?
Nah, go to a good team and win.
People don't know WHAT they want.
If you do it in a logical manner, sure. But all of this got damn emotional talk over what grown men decide to do with their own lives is some TMZ type stuff man.This man dc is the worst. Let us talk **** about the warriors in peace.
So what is your opinion when Lebron left to Miami to win rings
but he got 4/$70M 4 months after tearing his achilleshes coming off a major injury so nobody is trying to throw bags at him... look at wes matthews not the same guy after the injury
“If i were a true gsw fan, i wouldn't even be proud of those rings. If stars are ok getting stacked team rings, so be it.”
We had 2 winning season from 1993-2012. You think I feel sorry for the rest of the league
This league was dominated by the Lakers and Celtics for the majority of its existence. Y’all are something else
As mentioned before, I ASSUME, Boggie is using this year as an audition to other teams to show them that he is OK. Next year is the year that he will be looking for the real monies.I get this for Durant or lebron.. all time greats who have seen the heat guys like Barkley get
For boogie, I'm looking at it for what it is, a business
I'm looking at the highest offer and potential future money there, potential for other stuff.. then state taxes, cost of living, standard of living and potential headaches would have to deal with in that location
You used KD as your base for the Warriors story?
CANT BREEF.
I say this with all due respect, this makes ZERO sense. As a fan, if your team wins, you are happy. Point blank.If i were a true gsw fan, i wouldn't even be proud of those rings. If stars are ok getting stacked team rings, so be it.
Excellent pointAlso if you play basketball this should ring true. If im out here scoring 10 points for my team and were playing to 16, and we lose 16 - 12, and their highest player had 6 points, is he all of a sudden better than me because they won? Thats how the narrative is in the nba for legacy. done ranting lol
You want to watch good basketball?Bruh, our every day life does not include A COMPETITIVE SPORT. Washing dishes is not a competitive sport. Being an engineer isn't a competitive sport.
People want to see good basketball, not stacked teams running trains on the league.
If i were a true gsw fan, i wouldn't even be proud of those rings. If stars are ok getting stacked team rings, so be it.
There’s no passion in wanting to win. Everyone just decides to do it when it’s time. The players of yesteryear would battle season to season and deal with unfathomable upsets just to one day call themselves world champions and no what it took. Now you just teamup with players that you once wanted to fight or posed next to a shirt that called them a ***** to win. Lebron was meant to be the embodiment of every player from yesteryear and instead became the god father of this new breed of gutless championships. It is what it is.
PREACHHHHHWould you prefer for me to start at the title they won because of Lebron 2nd and 3rd options not being able to play or the 3-1 finals loss?
Beautifully saidExactly y i think when youre determining a players legacy that winning shouldnt be so highly looked at. I mean if lebron joins up with kawhi, and ad comes through and some other players to the lakers and they win 4 straight, bron has 7 rings and people would automatically start dubbing him > mj. As a player youre always going to score the minority of points on a team. No ones out there putting up 55 a game.
That means when it comes to winning your teammates are always going to have the higher percentage of "weight" when it comes to winning because their input percentage is much higher than just one players.
Youre pretty much judging players on their teammates performances which makes no sense. Its just the narrative everyone has always used because winning championships looks good and is easy to use as a measuring stick while analysis and realizing that even with winning a championship, the best player was still in the minority percentage of affecting the game, just like all the other individual players. Long post lol but this isnt tennis. Putting extreme emphasis on wins is lazy when it comes to determining how good someone is
We been over the cap ; our owner is just willing to spend.Warriors have any money left?