- 21,447
- 12,532
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2007
How is ND in?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I don't see why people are complaining about Notre Dame being in. Would you prefer to watch Alabama destroy the Aggies again?
I don’t know how some people watch ESPN all day. Had this on for 10 minutes and these guys are ******* clueless. Wanna talk about A&M getting blown out by Bama in week 2 then 3 minutes later talk about how Oklahoma isn’t the same team that started 1-2 with losses to a team that got beat by Louisiana and ****** Kansas State.Notre Dame LOL
Interested to hear the rationalization.
“We saw what happened when they played Clemson at full strength, but that limp away win over Clemson’s B team earlier this year has to count for something!”
I’m not saying Bama wouldn’t beat A&M. They would.I don't see why people are complaining about Notre Dame being in. Would you prefer to watch Alabama destroy the Aggies again?
I’m not saying Bama wouldn’t beat A&M. They would.
But what’s a better barometer for where we are today? A game A&M played 10 weeks ago, or what we just watched happen to Notre Dame last night where they couldn’t score until Clemson pulled starters off the field?
If you take the G5 games the ACC got to play, the resumes are basically identical. They keep banging the WINS OVER .500 TEAMS drum. Notre Dame beat 4, and two of them were only over .500 because they got to play an extra cupcake game.
These guys on ESPN acting like it’s clear and definitive bothers me more than actually not getting in.
Don’t disagree.Shoulda just kept the BCS
I’m not saying Bama wouldn’t beat A&M. They would.
But what’s a better barometer for where we are today? A game A&M played 10 weeks ago - against an Alabama WITH another Top 15 pick at receiver - or what we just watched happen to Notre Dame last night where they couldn’t score until Clemson pulled starters off the field?
If you take the G5 games the ACC got to play, the resumes are basically identical. They keep banging the WINS OVER .500 TEAMS drum. Notre Dame beat 4, and two of them were only over .500 because they got to play an extra cupcake game.
These guys on ESPN acting like it’s clear and definitive bothers me more than actually not getting in.
Shoulda just kept the BCS
The BCS was a mess. I didn't like the fact that it was based solely on a computer formula and the human component was taken out of it.
Yes. The defense is significantly better than it was week 1 and 2. Bama would still beat us by 28 if we played again though.I'm definitely not here stumping for Notre Dame but I don't understand the outcry from A&M fans. Do you think Texas A&M is a different team than they were when they played Alabama the first time? I really don't think so, they've looked very beatable throughout the season, It's not like they're peeking now or anything. They look like the same good but not great team they've been all season. If A&M played Alabama again, we'd see another four touchdown beating.
I don’t think there’s any question they’re better now than they were Week 2. They’re giving up 10 points a game over the last month of the year. They’re pounding people to death in the run game. The LSU game is the one ugly one, but it was pouring rain from the jump. But they’re physically dominating everyone they’ve played since Florida.I'm definitely not here stumping for Notre Dame but I don't understand the outcry from A&M fans. Do you think Texas A&M is a different team than they were when they played Alabama the first time? I really don't think so, they've looked very beatable throughout the season, It's not like they're peeking now or anything. They look like the same good but not great team they've been all season.
I don’t see a lie
Definitely a receiver. A Gates comparison is way off . Pitts can’t in-line block at all. He’s going to be split out to be effective.
Nebraska the only reason the Big10 every played a season and now they’re turning down bowl games.
So you’re agreeing he’s not a TE . Definitely a valuable piece to be used as an offensive weapon. He’s probably a souped up Funchess if we’re being completely honestly, which isn’t a knock at all.I think you use him all over the place.. but if a team drafts him trying use him like a inline traditional TE, then that’s on them
we seeing it play out right now with Evan engram
but dude definitely is a receiver/h back.. you should be motioning dude all over the place and lining him up at dinferent spots trying get mismatches vs LBs or safeties or smaller slot CB
force defenses to have to account for dude on every play with matchups