- 12,383
- 7,885
no one is touching Bridges and i wouldnt want him here even for the minimum contract
Official '24-'25 knicks season thread, Wu-tang nike commercial
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by pr0phecy718,
- Start date
- 5,667
- 6,627
- 6,631
- 2,599
Maybe a stupid question, but i never know with these statements teams put out about injuries.
Is a contusion worse than a sprain? Lol
Just wondering if Brunson gonna be out a couple games, cause I would love to see McBride get as much playing time as possible right now while he’s gaining confidence.
Is a contusion worse than a sprain? Lol
Just wondering if Brunson gonna be out a couple games, cause I would love to see McBride get as much playing time as possible right now while he’s gaining confidence.
- 26,035
- 23,002
100%
I wanted Duece to be the starting PG this year but it is what it is. So now I rather be cautious and sit JB and start Duece.
I wonder what would happenn if he excel? Suggestions?
Duece
RJ
Grimes
Randle
Mitch
Would be nice ...
Last edited:
- 12,383
- 7,885
absolutely nothing. with Thibs, Deuce is more likely to get benched than get even more minutes with a healthy roster. Cam was starting and playing well, but somehow ended up with DNPs. Thibs is a dunce.
- 92,226
- 127,701
Hi, Laker fan here. Is there an appetite to trade Hartenstein? Kthanxbye.
- 26,035
- 23,002
For? Lmao
- 6,631
- 2,599
Yea get iHart radio outta here as soon as possible.
- 32,800
- 19,699
- 26,035
- 23,002
- 21,288
- 20,791
tried to sneak randles girl in there like we wouldn’t notice
hartenstein clears by a mile still
- 92,226
- 127,701
I think this is fair? Beverley, Nunn and Jones carry neutral to negative value. Beverley and Nunn are expirings, Jones has a player option for next season at the minimum.
Reddish has residual potential, but I think it's more like neutral value. Fournier is a negative contract. I think the second rounders balance it out, but let me know what you guys think? Could probably haggle over the second rounders. Don't think it's worth it to the Knicks to attach a first rounder by any means to get off Fournier in this trade.
- 35,359
- 26,989
I'll take it. As long as we waive Beverley. Dont need that fake barking at the Garden.
- 13,814
- 13,101
Why would we move all those draft picks if they are in need of shooting? If anything they should give us some assets back.
- 35,359
- 26,989
Because the Fournier contract is untradable without adding assets this year.
Would clear a good chunk of cap space for us to chase another star we won't get or add on another bad contract in FA.
Would clear a good chunk of cap space for us to chase another star we won't get or add on another bad contract in FA.
Mister Meaner
formerly super producer j
- 20,530
- 10,986
And that star you wanna chase is going to be available in FA this year?
ballinsam23
ballinsam23
- 12,383
- 7,885
We don’t even need an actual all star. We need a 3 and D wing. We’re going to be thin at 2/3 with only RJ and Grimes.
- 92,226
- 127,701
Fine, knock it down to two seconds and I would still accept.
- 26,035
- 23,002
I think this is fair? Beverley, Nunn and Jones carry neutral to negative value. Beverley and Nunn are expirings, Jones has a player option for next season at the minimum.
Reddish has residual potential, but I think it's more like neutral value. Fournier is a negative contract. I think the second rounders balance it out, but let me know what you guys think? Could probably haggle over the second rounders. Don't think it's worth it to the Knicks to attach a first rounder by any means to get off Fournier in this trade.
Bro ... ya mFing lakers fans are dillusional!!!
Aint no way Im giving any draft picks for that BS trade. I rather keep Evan and Cam in the dog house .... than being in who?????
What you're proposing is for the Knicks to give you someone that automatically is going to spread the floor for you guys with Evan and draft picks so you can go ahead and trade Westbrooks using those same draft picks.
If Evans contract is untradeable why are there already rumora of suitors for him? Obviously there's a market. Dude is only a year removed from making the most 3 in Knicks history ... someone probably values that more than D.
- 10,246
- 8,501
Did Hubert dirty
- 26,035
- 23,002
Did Hubert dirty
Besides being disgusted by this .. I see that Duece might get heavy minutes today. Probably should be starting over IQ, but who ******* knows with Thibs.
We might very well see Rose starting and IQ coming off the bench before Duece.
- 10,246
- 8,501
I’m starting to warm up on Deuce.
- 10,246
- 8,501
I’d give those picks to LA as long as they take Hart too, sick of looking at him.
- 10,246
- 8,501
- 12,383
- 7,885
BR is trash btw. Even though we have no reason to trust our FO, i highly doubt they’ll continue to pay Evan to ride the bench. There’s a market for him, but I don’t think they’ll attach picks just to dump him.
