- 25,940
- 19,104
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2003
I like the jerseys and kinda watch to cop a mitch... but just hesistant cuz if he gets traded smh
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I didn’t click the thread. I already know.
But what I didn’t see was the Julius and Brunson exchange.
Like bro, Brunson is clearly trying to make you a better and smarter player. He’s the leader of this team. Come on bro.
That font is terrible... They should have just put some orange lining on the white font...For anyone that isn't too disgusted to buy a jersey, the city Edition joints dropped and the MSG Shop has a lot more players to choose from.
![]()
Knicks 23-24 City Edition
Get Rangers and Knicks gear from shop.msg.com, the official store of Madison Square Garden. Shop.msg.com has New York Knicks jerseys, New York Rangers jerseys and more Rangers and Knicks merchandise.shop.msg.com
Indeed, they do, and from a distance, the fonts don't appear too bad either, resembling a drop shadow. However, when you get up close, I'm not a fan of them.City unis definitely look better on the players than the computer imo
![]()
Perhaps I'm being pessimistic, but I can't envision any of those teams having a genuine need for Randle. Well, maybe the Mavs, but I wouldn't want anything they're offering in return. Expecially after they sabotage the draft!Teams would trade for Randle. I wanna refuse to believe 0 teams have interest in a player who’s all NBA two of the last 3 years. Maybe they’re not salivating for Randle but for the right price they would.
As for what teams? Maybe
Mavs / Pistons / Raptors / Bulls / Hawks / Wizards / Blazers / Rockets
Maybe a team that is more guard heavy and can use a PF
![]()
That's exactly why I refuse to be delusional again this seasonCrazy how we've had the same problem for the last 3 years. Its always Thibs or Randle
My top priority is parting ways with Randle. This would compel Thibs to adapt and change the offensive approach. While he may not possess a strong offensive scheme, he tends to extract more from role players compared to many coaches. In my opinion, dismissing Thibs now won't make a significant difference. I believe we'd end up in a similar situation. I'd prefer that he's let go later in the season or during the offseason. At this juncture, it's not that the team is terrible, but the offense is simply atrocious, which was somewhat expected with Thibs at the helm and no offseason moves.That's exactly why I refuse to be delusional again this season. Until Thibs and Julius are gone, THIS WILL NEVER WORK. It's time to face facts instead of wasting years in misery. It's so damn frustrating turning on 82 games a year just to be pissed the whole game because of the ugly brand of basketball we are forcing our talent to play. They have to go
This early into the season i see no reason why you dont experiment with Fournier some
According to some individuals here, Fournier is seen as having absolutely no value, even though we're paying him more than most. It's quite perplexing! While it's true that he's not a strong defender, our real issue is on the offensive side. I don't get it either, but we know nothing!This early into the season i see no reason why you dont experiment with Fournier some
This early into the season i see no reason why you dont experiment with Fournier some