- Feb 19, 2013
- 526
- 510
they have different style codes, so i will think they will be a little different. someone had mentioned they may not have that pattern on the white.
Official Air Jordan 1 Retro High Thread Vol: Best Model/Thread
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by Spectacular23,
- Start date
- Nov 26, 2012
- 34
- 26
$89.98.
Felt good about these after going home and trying them on
Felt good about these after going home and trying them on
- Jan 26, 2013
- 1,857
- 456
+1 mad jelly
- Nov 7, 2011
- 3,175
- 1,266
Man those things are in smoking condition amazing pickup!Figured you'd guys appreciate my new pick up
- Aug 10, 2013
- 42
- 11
Damn! These are in great condition! Amazing pick up bro. These are my favorite shoes of all time.
- Dec 2, 2011
- 9,407
- 8,127
I paid a decent price but honestly I'd rather pay 400 for these than some shoes that were limited and came out two weeks ago.
Rocked them today too. I put an extra pair of insoles in for some extra padding and they were very comfortable after
Rocked them today too. I put an extra pair of insoles in for some extra padding and they were very comfortable after
- Apr 8, 2010
- 12,757
- 6,239
Nice pickup! I wish JB retro'd the Chicago 1 with the OG treatment 
- Mar 11, 2013
- 11,177
- 1,537
- Feb 23, 2010
- 2,577
- 475
man i love those 94' chicagos.... i hate the oversized leather tongue on the recent retro.
- Feb 18, 2013
- 18,087
- 8,629
Reason why I didn't cop the newer version. I couldn't get with the leather tongue but if it was nylon material they would've been hadman i love those 94' chicagos.... i hate the oversized leather tongue on the recent retro.
freshjskickz
Banned
- May 16, 2013
- 400
- 27
Can you give some details? Year? Deadstock? Restoration?
- Jan 10, 2013
- 3,136
- 883
I had them back in the day but why didnt they do any others? 94s are serious classics.
- Dec 2, 2011
- 9,407
- 8,127
They're size 13 from 1994. They weren't Deadstock but minor flaws. Just some slight tongue and midsole yellowing and creasing.
- Feb 18, 2013
- 18,087
- 8,629
a size 13 you say..........
- Oct 20, 2006
- 2,234
- 192
not 94 chicagos but picked these up for 90 bucks and did a little work got more details to work on but i like so far
- Dec 2, 2011
- 9,407
- 8,127
a size 13 you say..........
Haha you won't see me parting with them anytime soon.
There's an eBay seller with DS '94 Chicago and Breds in a 13 for a G a piece tho
- Feb 18, 2013
- 18,087
- 8,629
I hope a G means retail in some foreign languageHaha you won't see me parting with them anytime soon.
There's an eBay seller with DS '94 Chicago and Breds in a 13 for a G a piece tho
EddieDoyers
formerly eddiengambino
- Apr 3, 2012
- 46,208
- 23,878
MJ dunkin in the True Blue 1s
- Mar 26, 2013
- 1,610
- 201
- Aug 9, 2012
- 3,638
- 8,179
Yup. Most of the black/gold pairs from 85 are fake.guys RIFLA just put on Instagram that a customer of theirs bought a pair of 1985 royals from the flea market.. And say that their fake, were they're fakes back then? Like in the 80's
- Mar 26, 2013
- 1,610
- 201
Dam I did not know that. Wow!! I thought companies started manufacturing replicas late 90's going into the 2000's
- Jul 11, 2013
- 1,791
- 1,961
Congrats. I wasn't feeling these at first, but I tried them on and they look great on feet. I paid a little more than you did though... $99.$89.98.
Felt good about these after going home and trying them on
Javier
EddieDoyers
formerly eddiengambino
- Apr 3, 2012
- 46,208
- 23,878
People have been selling fakes since.......forever lol
RIF probably checked inside the shoe and the tagging if they were fake. From far away I can't really tell if they are fake though
- Sep 23, 2012
- 32,830
- 24,897
Wow the fake royals from '85 look better than the fakes royals around today
- Mar 26, 2013
- 1,610
- 201
For real, I can't tell if they're fake or not. The leather looks on point for a replica. Lol
