babyjs23
Staff member
- 19,955
- 26,571
Oh mama! This is starting to get very interesting.Chickenwop:
Last edited:
Official Air Jordan 1 Retro High Thread Vol: Best Model/Thread
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by Spectacular23,
- Start date
- 40,141
- 11,080
Samples from chickenwop:
Once again, aint legit till we get the official news from NIKE
same pics from last yr.....
same hand written tag
babyjs23
Staff member
- 19,955
- 26,571
- 4,602
- 5,452
Yup, those are old pics.
- 4,289
- 2,368
I wasnt sure...the toebox just reminded me of the 15's AJ1.
like I said...nothing is solid till it comes from NIKE and this guys is known for having samples...
I wish they do release but I am not betting on it...
babyjs23
Staff member
- 19,955
- 26,571
Aw man! I thought we had something to look forward to.
- 2,285
- 556
How is the quality on the black elephant print 1s? Anyone have them in hand and can speak on them?
- 1,791
- 1,961
Meh, typical plastic-y feel. I held them in hand last weekend at HoH. Didn't interest me at all.
- 2,285
- 556
Thanks for the opinion. I haven't seen them in person and they look nice in the stock photos so I was thinking of getting them to wear. But if they're the plastic feeling leather I'll pass. I want at least cyber Monday 1 leather feel.
alp
Banned
- 39,966
- 8,990
For today
- 7,447
- 10,262
alp
Banned
- 39,966
- 8,990
thanks manREPPED!!
- 1,132
- 304
I just got got guys. Ordered some cyber monday 1s from the bay from a seller with 1500+ feedback and 100% positive reviews. Should I talk to the seller about a refund or just go straight to opening a dispute?
Too many stitch errors, leather was cut sloppily, nike tag on the tongue was stitched incorrectly, production dates were wrong, jumpman wasn't visible on the size tags, and leather just wasn't as soft as my legit pair.
Too many stitch errors, leather was cut sloppily, nike tag on the tongue was stitched incorrectly, production dates were wrong, jumpman wasn't visible on the size tags, and leather just wasn't as soft as my legit pair.
alp
Banned
- 39,966
- 8,990
which seller?
- 1,132
- 304
babyjs23
Staff member
- 19,955
- 26,571
- 1,791
- 1,961
No problem. The leather is nowhere close to CM1s.
- 1,132
- 304
I mean I guess that they could be imperfections, but there is so many that if this is a legit pair, I think I still want to send them back. I don't buy enough Jordans to know if this happens regularly. Do people ever get pairs that are significantly blemished like this?
- 22,125
- 69,951
Unless you haven't bought anything from JB since around 03', I welcome you to 2016 JB quality.
- 1,132
- 304
The more I look and compare them, the more wrong I see with them. Yeah I'm pretty sure these are GM/UAs
babyjs23
Staff member
- 19,955
- 26,571
I've seen worse. My CM's had quite a few loose threads, but I just cut them off. My Chicago's had a cut/piece missing on the medial panel down near the first 3 lace holes and I know mine are legit. See below.
Here's my CM inner tag.
Last edited:
- 1,132
- 304
Well I have, but quality I go in understanding, but this pair is not even trying. And even if quality is bad, JB is typically consistent. At least in my experience
- 11,959
- 6,203
Tongues and tags are par the course. The tongues my pair looks the same 
- 3,602
- 2,238
Yea those CM doesn't look that bad. Ppl so picky these days. Its like they buying a car or something. But I understand since u don't get to try them on before u buy anymore.
- 1,132
- 304
That's supposed to be stitched along the eye stay no?
