- 23,625
- 27,183
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2006
I think it might be the same height as the melo 1. It says high but really not the retro 1 OG heights. And also the past couple BHM hasn't been the real height even tho it says high[/QUOTE]
Not true
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I think it might be the same height as the melo 1. It says high but really not the retro 1 OG heights. And also the past couple BHM hasn't been the real height even tho it says high[/QUOTE]
Not true
Don't rule out DTLR having wrong pic and description. This feels like the recent Jeter 1 release where we didn't have pics till like a day or 2 before. Also Pinoe said the style codes were not the same. Take it FWIW
Why you say broham??I think I won
Or a even bigger plot is if they end up being a Mid with Jumpman branding once receivedgold toes being the equality 1s is the first great plot twist of the year
Plot twist to an American Sneakerhead StoryOr a even bigger plot is if they end up being a Mid with Jumpman branding once received
All footsites show them as High OG so they should be it. I would die though if all the photos never showed the back of the shoe then when it got to release day, Jumpman on the back.
kind of off topic but anyone know why theres suddenly so much interest in the Jordan 1.5s? Sold 2 pairs of the chicago colorway recently easily for way above retail but they were on clearance 2 years back
If I had to guess, maybe it's due to the soaring prices of the 2015 Chis. People who are unwilling to pay $500 might settle for the 1.5s.
Side note:
With all this leather quality talk why doesn't anyone talk about Laser 1's? I get it...they aren't for everybody but those joints are PLUSH!