CARTEL777
Supporter
- Apr 15, 2019
- 2,799
- 37,980
Official Air Jordan 1 Retro High Thread Vol: Best Model/Thread
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by Spectacular23,
- Start date
- Jun 1, 2023
- 329
- 472
So NBA Store had a bunch on hand to release on the original Nike release date of 10/18/24?
- Sep 26, 2011
- 788
- 2,196
- Jul 1, 2008
- 14,992
- 20,460
I knew one of ya was gonna post that in here as soon as I saw it 
- Aug 10, 2012
- 20,960
- 37,501
- Sep 22, 2014
- 13,549
- 12,102
JB employees: "Oh hey, it's that clown who clout chases on IG-what's his name again? ..Oh yeah!"
- Sep 22, 2014
- 13,549
- 12,102
I wonder if they'll eventually release these Satin Royals as a GRI couldn't cop the Smoke Greys at retail so I rage copped something else
(not really)
Satin Banneds coming in
Bonus:
moe200069
Supporter
- May 15, 2005
- 25,084
- 45,007
Reimagined cracked, aged satin banned 1s incoming. Special “air jordan” replacing the wings logo to really please all of us
- Dec 30, 2013
- 3,141
- 3,290
Just give me a pair of banned High joints with X again…. Keep making shoes for my sister smh! If i see one more women release ima go crazy
- Sep 22, 2014
- 13,549
- 12,102
- Jul 21, 2020
- 250
- 445
Jordan Brand Celebrates 40th Anniversary of Michael Jordan's Banned Sneakers
Jordan Brand celebrates the 40th anniversary of Michael Jordan's Banned sneakers, ahead of the Air Jordan 1 High 85 "Bred" release in 2025.
sneakerbardetroit.com
- Sep 5, 2021
- 6,572
- 12,185
I didn’t realize there were Air Ship Breds back then.iCheck the pic of em joints at the end…Jordan Brand Celebrates 40th Anniversary of Michael Jordan's Banned Sneakers
Jordan Brand celebrates the 40th anniversary of Michael Jordan's Banned sneakers, ahead of the Air Jordan 1 High 85 "Bred" release in 2025.
The only pictures I ever see are the white and red pair.
- Oct 6, 2016
- 10,681
- 23,834
There are still people that did not know it was the Ship and not the actual Jordan 1?
- Sep 5, 2021
- 6,572
- 12,185
I knew that.
I just thought it was the white and red pair that was banned.
…is that not correct?
- Dec 3, 2013
- 22,547
- 33,351
- Sep 5, 2021
- 6,572
- 12,185
- Sep 27, 2005
- 10,224
- 3,619
no one told Nike that most women don’t spend much money on shoes outside of designer ones like some red bottoms
and even then they wanna be gifted red bottoms, not buy em
- Apr 9, 2017
- 17,235
- 48,016
That's the thing they want us to buy them Js.
- Oct 6, 2016
- 10,681
- 23,834
Last edited:
- Dec 30, 2013
- 3,141
- 3,290
had them thinking ahaaa during 2017-2019 when small sizes were slapping
got bamboozled lol
- Jun 1, 2023
- 329
- 472
So these Bred banned being released next year (and the one's released previously) are more or less marketing gimmicks from JB and not the actual design of the '84 banned kicks?
- Oct 6, 2016
- 10,681
- 23,834
Nike took this and ran with it. Making it appear that it was the Black Red Jordan 1 that was bieng banned. The NBA was strict with the rules of uniform policy. I think they wanted the shoes to atleast be 51% white at the time if the rest of the team wore white shoes. The Bred Jordan, like those Ships, were not going to make the cut. I think also it was a team to team thing. You just had to match what the rest of the team was wearing .
- Sep 27, 2005
- 10,224
- 3,619
that’s the other thing
a guy is gonna buy 5 plus pairs of shoes before buying his girl a pair
it’s really closer to 10 but they should see by now it’s a failed mission
all the bigger (men) sizes are typically gone and the actual women sizes are on deep discount
- Dec 3, 2013
- 22,547
- 33,351
I still remember being banned by the league. They claimed I wasn’t good enough to be in it.
