- Mar 6, 2019
- 1,373
- 4,809
Official Air Jordan 1 Retro Low OG Thread
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by quise2024,
- Start date
- Dec 30, 2022
- 613
- 744
Damn just pulled the trigger at 148.25 out the door for a size 9.
I def. did not want to cop another pair of shoes after dropping 222 on the 8's.
Couldn't help myself with all the glowing reviews though. NOOOOOO.
I def. did not want to cop another pair of shoes after dropping 222 on the 8's.
Couldn't help myself with all the glowing reviews though. NOOOOOO.
- Jul 28, 2012
- 5,963
- 10,387
Prices going up it seems.... Glad I doubled up, didn't want to get to greedy. 141 shipped on stockx is like 111 bid getting accepted after fees 
- Nov 30, 2021
- 187
- 834
Just perfect on foot.
- Jan 10, 2016
- 17,924
- 21,210
Really are a perfect pair
Makes me forget about highs, low key
Makes me forget about highs, low key
- Mar 29, 2001
- 22,398
- 71,020
Highs still in rotation
- Jan 10, 2016
- 17,924
- 21,210
- Mar 29, 2001
- 22,398
- 71,020
High/low 85s only bro
- Aug 9, 2012
- 3,638
- 8,179
These fit slightly more snug than the normal og lows. Maybe 1/4 size smaller.
only way to go with 1s now - if it aint an 85, easy pass
- Apr 30, 2011
- 8,275
- 11,056
Only been a couple 85’s so can’t agree with that. Make them available and in more colorways and I might start getting there
- Mar 29, 2001
- 22,398
- 71,020
I like that it’s only been a few as opposed to the millions pairs of OG highs
- Jul 28, 2012
- 5,963
- 10,387
Anyone else feel their toe box has a lot of space on their 85 lows? Length feels great to me....but after really putting them on, I feel like the box area is just extra bulky....
- Apr 25, 2005
- 33,428
- 39,205
85 highs are super easy pass for me. 85 lows I will cop tho.
- Jul 1, 2008
- 14,939
- 20,340
Yeah there isn't a low that could ever make me forget about the high counterpart
- Sep 5, 2021
- 6,425
- 11,882
Reason?
- Apr 25, 2005
- 33,428
- 39,205
I despise the ugly jacked up toebox.
- Apr 30, 2011
- 8,275
- 11,056
That was the first thing I pointed out on the comparison in this thread a couple weeks ago. It looks like it’s taller, wider, bulkier.
Interested to compare on foot myself but it appears bigger in the forefoot and much more snug at the back of the foot.
- Nov 6, 2013
- 779
- 6,817
- Sep 5, 2021
- 6,425
- 11,882
But…that’s how they looked in 85!
- Jul 1, 2008
- 14,939
- 20,340
Depends on the factory the shoe was manufactured in. Some were sleek, some were more bulbous. IYKYK.
- Apr 30, 2011
- 8,275
- 11,056
That’s the look right there
- Apr 25, 2005
- 33,428
- 39,205
My ‘85s didn’t look like thisDepends on the factory the shoe was manufactured in. Some were sleek, some were more bulbous. IYKYK.
I would’ve skipped getting them if so.
However, the ‘85 High Retro isn’t even as good as this.
- Jul 1, 2008
- 14,939
- 20,340
You didn't care about toe box shape in 1985, please stop it 
And if you don't think the '85 retro toe box doesn't looks similar to that or better then idk what to tell you honeestly.
And if you don't think the '85 retro toe box doesn't looks similar to that or better then idk what to tell you honeestly.
- Apr 25, 2005
- 33,428
- 39,205
Nah, I wont. This is my original 1985 tag I kept from since then. If you don’t think I was obsessed with this shoe then you’re crazy. I knew the details and what I had…but carry on.You didn't care about toe box shape in 1985, please stop it
