- 1,646
- 314
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2013
in my opinion, looking like scott disick is an argument AGAINST buying this shoe
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
nobody is trying to dress like him, it isnt like this ensemble has never been worn by anyone in the past (minus the leathersin my opinion, looking like scott disick is an argument AGAINST buying this shoe
it is possible if you didn't have the money back then.......I was 16 with a kid in 01. But im not you, I always stayed up on the Js even if i didn't have the money to get them yetWhat? How is this possible?? Apparently if you were "in the game" in 2001 then these were an easy cop... More pairs produced then the 17s that year
Quit playing games. I could say because I was 11 in 2001 that I missed out on these too. Anyone born before '01 could say that
But the reality is - I had no idea royal 1s existed in 2001 nor did I care. But if I knew and wanted them and had the money for them---- I could have got them. Same applies for you.
Not sure why anyone would hate resellers. Not everyone can get limited J's or whatever for retail$393.00
$312.00
i thought niketalk hated resellers and where all cheap
when did the big spenders start posting on NT & spending close to $400.00 for a just released jordan 1 out of all jordans
i always though niketalk looked for $600.00 valued shoes for $150.00
times are changing, if a person wants something and they have the means for it. all the power to them$393.00
$312.00
i thought niketalk hated resellers and where all cheap
when did the big spenders start posting on NT & spending close to $400.00 for a just released jordan 1 out of all jordans
i always though niketalk looked for $600.00 valued shoes for $150.00
trueTo be honest, if you are a true Jordan collector or aficionado, you would respect and appreciate the Jordan 1 as being the sneaker that started this whole frenzy, so if anything, the Jordan 1 should be the sneaker that you WOULD break the bank for.
Yea something really wrong with his pant...Nothing wrong with his outfit even though I've seen it a lot. Let not act like a bunch of ****** weren't wearing the typical jean jacket/chambray shirt with chinos/denim and these
I have 1 quick question - people keep saying I would never spend this kind of money on a Jordan 1 of all Jordans (or something to that affect). What does this even mean, exactly? Are you simply referring to the fact that this is the cheapest Jordan in terms of MSRP? Or is it something else?
To be honest, if you are a true Jordan collector or aficionado, you would respect and appreciate the Jordan 1 as being the sneaker that started this whole frenzy, so if anything, the Jordan 1 should be the sneaker that you WOULD break the bank for.
Not sure why anyone would hate resellers. Not everyone can get limited J's or whatever for retail
times are changing, if a person wants something and they have the means for it. all the power to them
I am looking to do this exact trade.
However it may be a little difficult, as I have a DS sz. 11 Banned's, but would need a DS sz. 10.5 in the 88's and a DS sz. 11 in the Royals.
I would do it because I was lucky enough to obtain two pairs of Banned's on release day, so I rock one, and have one just sitting in my closet.
For me, it would be difficult because of the sizing differences I need. But yes, I would definitely do it...and want to.
i agree with both you guys but back in 2005 i got a pair of limited jordans for alot more then retail & heads where crying on here like no tomorrow
people hating resellers now have no choice but to buy off a reseller
i have been seeing a few people buy new releases on here for a lot more then retail on a few recent hyped up shoes
so its just a shock to me for being on here so long dealing with lowballers
Not sure why anyone would hate resellers. Not everyone can get limited J's or whatever for retail
This...
It's just a different time in the wonderful world of shoes...
Everybody is a "Shoe~Head" now simply because it's the IN thing to do...
Did I wan't a pair of the Royal's?...Hell yes...Did I get a pair of Royal's?...Hell no...
It is what it is an you just move on to the next drop...I'm too damn old to get heated over missing a pair of shoes...
See the shoe game is good like that...If you miss something I guarantee there will be something else down the line that you will want more...
same could be said for people buying things for "trade bait"Not sure why anyone would hate resellers. Not everyone can get limited J's or whatever for retail
It would be a whole lot easier if people werent buying them just to sell them (resellers)...............................................
I have 1 quick question - people keep saying I would never spend this kind of money on a Jordan 1 of all Jordans (or something to that affect). What does this even mean, exactly? Are you simply referring to the fact that this is the cheapest Jordan in terms of MSRP? Or is it something else?
To be honest, if you are a true Jordan collector or aficionado, you would respect and appreciate the Jordan 1 as being the sneaker that started this whole frenzy, so if anything, the Jordan 1 should be the sneaker that you WOULD break the bank for.
The III is the sneaker that started the whole frenzy not the I IMO.
I see what you're saying but JB ruined the I's with all the garbage CW's they released
over the past few years.