- Jul 11, 2006
- 33,457
- 12,583
Man, at the end of the day things and characters and actions have been changed from the book to the show anyway.Once again there was nothing wrong with discussing the assassination. The part that you seem to not be able to comprehend is the difference between discussing a theory and confirming it because one has read the book. Every other synopsis/article about last nights episode asks the question "who killed Jeoffry."Wouldn't be much of an assassination if we all saw it clear as day...
Right, if we can't even discuss who plotted the assassination (although obvious and im still scratching my head at these post) what would we even talk about? Cersei's hoverboob shot till next Sunday? Snow delivering the ether to the Night's Watch council?
It was the highlight of the entire damn episode last night. I think people are just looking for something to complain about. This is NT.
Robb's wife as presented on the show never existed. Ramsey never had a side chick in ASOS as presented on the show. Shae didn't have 90% of the conversations/actions/roles she plays in the show as she has had in the book. Even the assassination from last night didn't go down identical to what happened in the book.
So while I agree dudes need to stop posting quotes from the book and confirming things that haven't been shown on the show yet, these are all still just theories. For all we know the actual poisoner or even who was involved in any prospective plots to poison (seeing as about 3 different people touched that cup and no one seemed mad when Joff croaked) is someone completely different from the books.
People were complaining about spoilers last year before the red wedding then even book readers were like "Oh ****!"
These are just theories until the show confirms them.
So calm ya t!ts It's gonna be ok.
Last edited: