- Oct 8, 2005
- 9,953
- 7,147
its not april fools. they need to get outta here with that. gucci mane without the mixtape scene is like...fries without the ketchup.
****OFFICIAL GUCCI MANE & BRICKSQUAD 1017****
- Apr 7, 2008
- 11,430
- 1,975
Damn, are they serious?
- Oct 8, 2005
- 9,953
- 7,147
dat piff was def hit. they took off mad tapes. afadsfdafslkj.
i hadn't d/l every tape he had cuz he has so many...
i hadn't d/l every tape he had cuz he has so many...
- Mar 2, 2007
- 1,766
- 12
- Nov 13, 2007
- 3,229
- 10
- Oct 8, 2005
- 9,953
- 7,147
*goes on massive d/l spree*
tryna get everything before they suck the web dry of his music. lol.
tryna get everything before they suck the web dry of his music. lol.
- Dec 21, 2002
- 28,114
- 2,665
- Jan 16, 2007
- 892
- 10
burrrprint 2 hd is a nice mixtape, good comeback gucci and drumma boy did his thang
- Dec 5, 2002
- 2,191
- 10
That's why u dont sell mixtapes
- Sep 11, 2008
- 7,389
- 237
what type of %!@@ is that
- Feb 3, 2010
- 2,081
- 11
- Oct 29, 2007
- 1,638
- 15
Ninjas getting gready!
- Nov 5, 2007
- 19,391
- 899
Originally Posted by hellaones
what type of %!@@ is that
- Jun 17, 2006
- 44,214
- 2,544
TOUCH MONEY wrote:
I'm coppin'!!!
- Feb 8, 2009
- 12,503
- 925
Its not Gucci or Bricksquad its mostly the label. They allowed dude to give out free music for a while. They let him drop 3 tapes in one day and he came up with modest sales. Thats why they suppose to be selling this Burrprint HD. They just trying to get what they feel they are owed. I dont agree with it but I get it.
- Mar 19, 2006
- 957
- 49
Isn't he supposed to do a mixtape with DJ Holiday when he gets out? (not BP2HD)
unless they plan on charging for it again.
unless they plan on charging for it again.
- Feb 25, 2008
- 8,978
- 84
Juice man is winning out here
those shades
ham city
Banned
- Oct 18, 2009
- 10,116
- 202
STOP TRIPPIN!
Let me interpret this for yall. THIS IS NOT SAYING GUCCI WILL STOP RELEASING MIXTAPES!.
the ONLY assertive FACTS stated above are that Warner Brothers Records, has filed a copyright infringement claim against Coast 2 Coast Mixtapes, which from the above article presumably owns Datpiff (as far as i know the largest free mixtape distribution site on the web), and that they will no longer post Gucci Mane's material in fear of legal action. Basically WB has said "you can no longer profit for free from Gucci Mane's material."
keep in mind that when you sign to a record label, 99% of the time you give away your rights to any music you produce, i don't know the details of Gucci's contract, but it's safe to presume that WB owns anything he records.
the next two paragraphs push Coast 2 Coast's own greedy agenda, nothing more nothing less. "we can't receive add revenue from the hottest rapper in the streets anymore, $$!% Gucci, $$!% his label." personally I find it disturbing that they want to act as if they played anything more than a MINIMAL part in Gucci's recent surge in popularity. not only did he blow up off his own hard work but Gucci himself has nothing to do with this.
the bottom line, Gucci made it. this means his label views him as a very valuable entity, more so then they have these past few years. basically an A&R at WB said, "Gucci is one of our most profitable foreseeable artist, his material is no longer available for free."
More presumption on my part but look for A LOT more push from the label in anything he puts out, his next album is gonna move more units off tops just because WB will be behind it. the days of 5+ free tapes a year are over, it's a trade off. don't buy into the bull *%%@ above.
- Dec 9, 2007
- 5,637
- 11
Great post Ham
- Sep 1, 2009
- 2,292
- 12
yo can somebody pm a link?
- Jun 17, 2006
- 44,214
- 2,544
Originally Posted by JPioneer
Great post Ham
Co-signing this...
- Jun 17, 2006
- 44,214
- 2,544
Originally Posted by JPioneer
Great post Ham
Co-signing this....
- Jan 16, 2007
- 892
- 10
Originally Posted by Ween H4ed
Isn't he supposed to do a mixtape with DJ Holiday when he gets out? (not BP2HD)
unless they plan on charging for it again.
The album will be titled The Appeal.
- Oct 29, 2007
- 1,638
- 15
Burrrrprint 2 is
- Oct 8, 2005
- 9,953
- 7,147
Don't act like we didn't know what the post said tho. Like we supposed to read your post and be on some, "oooh ok" type stuff. Nobody here is stupid. What it means is that they want to sell his mixtapes. Nobody is tryna cop his mixtapes which is why ppl (including me) posted what we posted. All the cosigners can get outta here. It means no more gucci tapes on datpiff. It could mean no more gucci tapes on livemixtapes once they (wb) finds out about it.
Don't know about the rest of you but I like being able to d/l guccis mixtape catalog easily. I don't feel like going through torrents or waiting for an RNS type release for a freaking mixtape. Agree to disagree but f all that.
I'm happy guccis label will support him and thinks highly of him but for thr mixtape fans this is a bad thing.
Don't know about the rest of you but I like being able to d/l guccis mixtape catalog easily. I don't feel like going through torrents or waiting for an RNS type release for a freaking mixtape. Agree to disagree but f all that.
I'm happy guccis label will support him and thinks highly of him but for thr mixtape fans this is a bad thing.
