Honestly what Dwight as done doesn't compare in all to what lebron did, fine he had the "decision" but he also raised what? 2 milli for the the boys and girls club? He didn't play games, say trade me / don't trade me, this or that, he stood quiet, made his announcement and kept it moving, Dwight had all this drama, this feud with his coach / GM / organization and couldn't attend his own basketball camp? The Cavs could've kept lebron had they made the effort to put talent around him, rather than crap, Remember when they had chances to trade for Bosh? Said no because they had JJ hicksonDwight and lebrons situation don't compare at all.
You're right their situations are different but the rest of your post is absurd. What does raising money have to do with anything? He could've donated that out of his pocket. And the decision in itself was a big game. Having a live show that had people waiting around/guessing who you were gonna sign with. What the hell is that? And if you think the Cavs had a snowball's chance in hell to keep LeBron you're delusional.
Had the Cavs given him a competitive team, yes I think he would've stayed, why wouldn't he? born and raised in Ohio, dude was a god in his state and did no wrong, everyone loved lebron. Bring a chip home? Of course he would've stayed, but the Cavs played games, gave him **** "talent" and expected for him to do it on his own, everyone needs help, no single player can win it on their own.
Honestly what Dwight as done doesn't compare in all to what lebron did, fine he had the "decision" but he also raised what? 2 milli for the the boys and girls club? He didn't play games, say trade me / don't trade me, this or that, he stood quiet, made his announcement and kept it moving, Dwight had all this drama, this feud with his coach / GM / organization and couldn't attend his own basketball camp? The Cavs could've kept lebron had they made the effort to put talent around him, rather than crap, Remember when they had chances to trade for Bosh? Said no because they had JJ hickson
You're right their situations are different but the rest of your post is absurd. What does raising money have to do with anything? He could've donated that out of his pocket. And the decision in itself was a big game. Having a live show that had people waiting around/guessing who you were gonna sign with. What the hell is that? And if you think the Cavs had a snowball's chance in hell to keep LeBron you're delusional.
Had the Cavs given him a competitive team, yes I think he would've stayed, why wouldn't he? born and raised in Ohio, dude was a god in his state and did no wrong, everyone loved lebron. Bring a chip home? Of course he would've stayed, but the Cavs played games, gave him **** "talent" and expected for him to do it on his own, everyone needs help, no single player can win it on their own.
The 2nd of the consecutive years (think it was bron's last there) that the Cavs had the best record in the league in the regular season all season long analysts said "that's why this team was put together, to win LeBron a title." When they lost, the only thing that was said was he didn't have any help. That no help ish had gotten so old it was ridiculous. When he gave up against Boston or whoever that was and when he was missing free throws and passing the ball to scrubs late in the game it was never his fault. LeBron was given diplomatic immunity while in Cleveland by virtue of "not having help" even though they won 60+ games in the regular season.
this thread is officially shot
now people are talking about the cavs having a good cast around lebron
