pastor glo
Banned
- 1,441
- 332
barry the rb version of iverson
great highlights with padded stats
great highlights with padded stats
OFFICIAL NFL Discussion Thread: 2015-16 Season - Congrats to the Denver Broncos and their fans! SB 5
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by DeadsetAce,
- Start date
- Status
- 38,406
- 7,519
Then you're still wrong because Tomlinson was a better all purpose back than Faulk and a better rusher.
- 37,287
- 19,666
The first five years of his career when he had 5320 yards rushing + 42 touchdowns and 297 receptions for 2804 yards + 8 touchdowns?
- 37,287
- 19,666
No he wasn't. LT was a better runner but Faulk was a better all purpose back. Do I need to provide stats again?
- 151,065
- 202,408
- 37,287
- 19,666
Did anyone else in this thread actually watch Marshall Faulk play football? Just curious.
- 8,070
- 5,047
You have no idea what you're getting out of your starting QB and Mark Sanchez is NOT a viable starter. Your receivers, save for Matthews, are unproven, your O-Line is half of what it was going into last year, and your secondary, while improved on paper heavily lacks depth. I understand Rowe is a good prospect. But beyond Maxwell, no one back there can play.
Your front 7 and RB core are stacked. Beyond that, there are tons of holes. You could win 6 games and you could win 10 games.
What would you like me to address concerning KB?
Last edited:
- 9,622
- 783
What a great hot take!!! [emoji]128293[/emoji][emoji]128293[/emoji][emoji]128293[/emoji]
- 37,287
- 19,666
- 58,761
- 30,162
Barry Sanders is just one of those players that can do wrong and is permanently considered the greatest ever despite evidence towards the contrary.
Last edited:
- 68,176
- 24,538
He does refer to him as Timmy and he broke up a fight yesterday
Sorry Matt, it's been real
- 22,885
- 2,317
Watched both and agree with your statement of Barry a better pure runner, Faulk a better overall player
- 16,006
- 4,734
You gonna do me like that after I repped you for the Barry vs Faulk debate? These **** ain't loyal
- 151,065
- 202,408
as I said before, sanchez was the QB that played vs the panthers last year
we kinda know what ertz, celek, kkkooper and miles Austin are.. huff is going into his second year, along with Matthews (ditto burton).. agholor is the singular rookie in that group
going into last year 4 of the 5 guys we intended to start along the Oline missed multiple games.. as mentioned before mathis missed 7 games, kelce missed the game vs the panthers, lane Johnson missed the 1st 4 games and herremans missed 8 games (our primary backup Oline guy missed games too)
if peters, kelce and Johnson are healthy, our Oline is better than who played vs the panthers
again, our starting 2 cbs were cary Williams and Bradley fletcher.. with nate allen at one of the safety spots.. bar not exactly THAT high.. but it helps when the opposing team doesn't have the strongest receiving core
and I'm talking about the eagles vs the panthers.. with specific reference to last year's game
but our holes were bigger on the team last year
- 151,065
- 202,408
please dear lord baby jesus let this mean we can move sanchez or barkley for something.. conditional late round pick(s) if they make the team works for me
I care less about any of our QBs outside of hoping for some sort of miracle with Bradford.. not like the bar was set particularly high by foles/sanchez last year.. just give me someone who can keep the turnovers down and get the ball into the right guys hands
Last edited:
- 68,176
- 24,538
you don't want to move Sanchez, he's one of the best BACK UP's in the league, you just hope he only needs to play 3-4 games max
- 20,222
- 4,207
I love Barry Sanders but he's not alone in the modern GOAT discussion
Payton, Faulk, Emmitt, Tomilnson and AP are in that convo too
Payton, Faulk, Emmitt, Tomilnson and AP are in that convo too
Last edited:
- 1,704
- 1,316
One of the best backups
Sanchez went 1-4 last year while killing any chance at a playoff berth after your starter went down.
He's terrible
Last edited:
- 20,222
- 4,207
Who's the best backup quarterback in the NFL?
- 9,622
- 783
Watched both and agree with your statement of Barry a better pure runner, Faulk a better overall player
His argument wasn't better overall player tho just better all purpose back.
- 37,287
- 19,666
Ryan Mallett or Brian Hoyer.
- 16,006
- 4,734
Pickings kinda slim, so yeah Sanchez might be in that Top 5 backup QB discussion unfortunately
- 151,065
- 202,408
I'm thinking long term at this point.. I'm praying this whole thing works out with Bradford, but other than that I don't have anything overly invested in our QBs
if Bradford doesn't work out, we're back to looking at the draft.. or hoping whisenhunt gets fired and team decides to move on
- 16,006
- 4,734
- 8,070
- 5,047
I forgot about those other guys on your line and didn't realize the specifics of the injuries.
Ertz is good, not great. Celek has regressed. Cooper is mediocre and Austin is well....Austin. Your core guys are Huff, Matthews, and Agholor; a rookie, a sophomore player who had 8 catches in 12 games, and Matthews who has promise. You have potential, but the only guy who you can rely on to make plays is Matthews and maybe Ertz.
All things considered, this year's game should be more competitive. Our O-Line can't be so unlucky to have as many injuries as it had last year and the young guys have some time under their belt now. While losing Benji, we have more depth than we did last year. Our 2nd and third options in that game were Cotchery and Avant. Though KB won't be here this time, Funchess, Ginn, and Boykin will provide a lot more relief alongside a top 3 TIGHT END** coming off a 1,000 yard season. Stewart just has to be more consistent. He HAS to stay healthy and he HAS to pick up where he left off or we're hurting. Plain and simple. We were also missing Tolbert during that game. Having him adds a ton of help in the backfield.
Defensively, we won't have the same slow secondary we did last year. Norman is prime for a season as a top 10 CB, maybe top 5, playing along Tillman and Benwikere. The front 7 needs no explanation.
On paper, I beleive our secondary trumps your receivers/TEs. Our front 7 vs your RBs will be a hell of a battle. I think our running game comes down to how well Cam can run the read option and how effective Stewart is. Against your front 7, it'll be tough. I'd give you the slight edge right now. And I think our passing attack vs your secondary is evenly matched.
So I think it will be a great game, one I'll be excited to watch on Prime Time. I still like us at home.
Last edited:
- Status
