OFFICIAL NFL Discussion Thread: 2015-16 Season - Congrats to the Denver Broncos and their fans! SB 5

Status
Not open for further replies.
To be fair the Pats only ever win Super Bowls when Gronk is healthy which was only last year. In 2011 they made it so close until he busted his foot in the AFCC before the Super Bowl vs the Giants.

meh...this view is oversimplified IMO. it's more than just having gronk or not having gronk. a healthy gronk didn't do much this year without julian edelman on the field this season. and then factor in what's happening on the other side of the ball...that 2011 defense was basura.


that said, with a healthy gronk, i love my chances going up against pretty much anyone.
 
CP totally pulled that "featured" argument out of his ***.

From 2011 to 2014 Jimmy Graham lead the Saints in targets every year, Rob Gronkowski never lead the New England Patriots NOT ONE time in targets in any of those years.

So please elaborate how Gronk was featured more.

From 2011-2014 New Orleans Saints attempted more passes than any team in NFL history except the Detroit Lions. The New Orleans Saints also were a bottom 4 run to pass ratio team during that time frame.

So please elaborate how the New Orleans Saints had a more balanced offense.


Saying Gronk was featured more in New England is your opinion is like me saying in my opinion I'm taller than Dirk. :lol

Targets don't just mean "featured"

Wes Welker gets TONS of targets, is he the A1 #1 focus of the NE offense every year? Or the focus of every defense he faces? He benefited off of Moss, and then Gronk, correct? Do you see what I mean in that sense? That's a ton of touches/looks, doesn't make him the featured player. Same with Edelman today.

And when I say balance, I don't mean run/pass man, come on. :lol I mean balance in terms of weaponry.

When both jumped out in 2011, Welker, Gronk, Chico, and Branch were all the targets. 173, 124, 113, and 90. Brady used those 4, all year long.

NO had Jimmy, Sproles, Colston, Moore, Meachem, Thomas, and Henderson all split targets. 149, 111, 107, 73, 60, 59, and 50.

Jimmy had plenty of looks, sure, my point is that NO spread the ball around so much, he should have had MORE than what he did. And part of why Sproles, and Thomas, had so many looks was all the attention defenses had to pay to Jimmy. (unless you believe that Sproles and Pierre Thomas made defenses not focus on Jimmy at all.)

My overall point is, I have an extremely high opinion of Tom Brady, and Bill Belichick. I was at one time roasted for years over saying Wes Welker would make the Pro Bowl playing for those 2. People swore at me for years. And, well, he did more than make a Pro Bowl. :lol

Brees and Payton are both really really good. But they aren't Brady and Belichick.

I look at last week, vs KC, both of those TD's to Gronk, KC had him one on one, didn't they? Bill/Brady murked them both times, off one on one coverage, in the Red Zone. The double move call was brilliant. Why on earth, with that team, that offense, would you line up 1 on 1 with Gronk, knowing that NE creates matchups in their favor?

Jimmy got looks in NO, no doubt, but he would be even MORE dangerous in that NE offense, IMO. You feel otherwise, that's fine. I'm not disrespecting Gronk, or saying that people are ******ed for backing him, I just believe Jimmy is better down the field and with the ball in his hands. Gronk is clearly the better blocker, I've never said otherwise. But used better, I think Jimmy would do ridiculous work on top of opening things up for others, like he did in NO. I really don't think that Lance Moore, Pierre Thomas, Devery Henderson, and Robert Meachem needed the touches they got, had a few more of those gone Jimmy's way, we would have seen numbers unseen at the TE position.

If you think those players needed those touches more, that's your call.

Fair enough response to your questions, or you need more to fully see what I'm sayin?

In 2013 Jimmy put up 1215 yards and 16 TD, he had 142 targets. Colston 111, Sproles 89, Thomas 84 ( 8o ) Moore 54, Stills 50, That's 5 other guys with 50+ and then Meachem and Watson with 30 each. So many guys that got looks that should have gone to Jimmy. Not every look, obviously, but two running backs with 173 combined looks out of the backfield? :lol :{

That's what I mean by balance of the Saints, Brees spread it around everywhere, whereas Gronk has always been one of the 3-4 guys Brady targets, and that's about it. This year is the most balanced NE has been, 120 for Gronk, with 88 and 87 to Edelman and Amendola, 74 LaFell, and then 104 total for Lewis and White out of the backfield., 54 and 50 each That's much closer to the Jimmy NO days than the other seasons in which Gronk was healthy in NE.

2014 was 134 Edelman, 131 Gronk, 119 LaFell, and 77 Vereen. Brady doesn't spread it around as much as what Brees has done when people are healthy. I think that's why you see the change in 2015, so many injuries forced them to throw it around to others more than he normally does. Most years he targets 3-4 guys heavily and then of course the occasional looks for others, 1-2 a game, etc.
 
Random...but is it just me or did Chip Kelly get fatter? Dude's got a turducken neck at this press conference.

Got fired and tried to eat up all the cheesteaks in Philly out of spite. Then got hired and celebrated by gorging on whatever it is y'all eat out in the Bay.

Seriously though. Guy is a BART train now.
seafood ? Fresh crab? Sourdough bread bowl?
 
That shoe looks as awful as Kevin Hart's shoe. Wonder if it will be his shoe or if he's just doing promo for Nike. It's nice seeing Football players get shoes again. You can get Robert Griffin's shoes at your local Ross for like $20. Regis had a nice shoe, just wasn't a fan of the colors they did.
 
That shoe looks as awful as Kevin Hart's shoe. Wonder if it will be his shoe or if he's just doing promo for Nike. It's nice seeing Football players get shoes again. You can get Robert Griffin's shoes at your local Ross for like $20. Regis had a nice shoe, just wasn't a fan of the colors they did.

Kevin Hart shoes are meant for the gym, they are nice IMO
 
I think too many people think every sneaker with a celeb attached has to be some hype Yeezy deal or meant to stunt, Kevin Hart shoes are meant to actually work out in

same with the Air Gronks I assume
 
CP totally pulled that "featured" argument out of his ***.

From 2011 to 2014 Jimmy Graham lead the Saints in targets every year, Rob Gronkowski never lead the New England Patriots NOT ONE time in targets in any of those years.

So please elaborate how Gronk was featured more.

From 2011-2014 New Orleans Saints attempted more passes than any team in NFL history except the Detroit Lions. The New Orleans Saints also were a bottom 4 run to pass ratio team during that time frame.

So please elaborate how the New Orleans Saints had a more balanced offense.


Saying Gronk was featured more in New England is your opinion is like me saying in my opinion I'm taller than Dirk. :lol

Targets don't just mean "featured"

Wes Welker gets TONS of targets, is he the A1 #1 focus of the NE offense every year? Or the focus of every defense he faces? He benefited off of Moss, and then Gronk, correct? Do you see what I mean in that sense? That's a ton of touches/looks, doesn't make him the featured player. Same with Edelman today.

And when I say balance, I don't mean run/pass man, come on. :lol I mean balance in terms of weaponry.

When both jumped out in 2011, Welker, Gronk, Chico, and Branch were all the targets. 173, 124, 113, and 90. Brady used those 4, all year long.

NO had Jimmy, Sproles, Colston, Moore, Meachem, Thomas, and Henderson all split targets. 149, 111, 107, 73, 60, 59, and 50.

Jimmy had plenty of looks, sure, my point is that NO spread the ball around so much, he should have had MORE than what he did. And part of why Sproles, and Thomas, had so many looks was all the attention defenses had to pay to Jimmy. (unless you believe that Sproles and Pierre Thomas made defenses not focus on Jimmy at all.)

My overall point is, I have an extremely high opinion of Tom Brady, and Bill Belichick. I was at one time roasted for years over saying Wes Welker would make the Pro Bowl playing for those 2. People swore at me for years. And, well, he did more than make a Pro Bowl. :lol

Brees and Payton are both really really good. But they aren't Brady and Belichick.

I look at last week, vs KC, both of those TD's to Gronk, KC had him one on one, didn't they? Bill/Brady murked them both times, off one on one coverage, in the Red Zone. The double move call was brilliant. Why on earth, with that team, that offense, would you line up 1 on 1 with Gronk, knowing that NE creates matchups in their favor?

Jimmy got looks in NO, no doubt, but he would be even MORE dangerous in that NE offense, IMO. You feel otherwise, that's fine. I'm not disrespecting Gronk, or saying that people are ******ed for backing him, I just believe Jimmy is better down the field and with the ball in his hands. Gronk is clearly the better blocker, I've never said otherwise. But used better, I think Jimmy would do ridiculous work on top of opening things up for others, like he did in NO. I really don't think that Lance Moore, Pierre Thomas, Devery Henderson, and Robert Meachem needed the touches they got, had a few more of those gone Jimmy's way, we would have seen numbers unseen at the TE position.

If you think those players needed those touches more, that's your call.

Fair enough response to your questions, or you need more to fully see what I'm sayin?

In 2013 Jimmy put up 1215 yards and 16 TD, he had 142 targets. Colston 111, Sproles 89, Thomas 84 ( 8o ) Moore 54, Stills 50, That's 5 other guys with 50+ and then Meachem and Watson with 30 each. So many guys that got looks that should have gone to Jimmy. Not every look, obviously, but two running backs with 173 combined looks out of the backfield? :lol :{

That's what I mean by balance of the Saints, Brees spread it around everywhere, whereas Gronk has always been one of the 3-4 guys Brady targets, and that's about it. This year is the most balanced NE has been, 120 for Gronk, with 88 and 87 to Edelman and Amendola, 74 LaFell, and then 104 total for Lewis and White out of the backfield., 54 and 50 each That's much closer to the Jimmy NO days than the other seasons in which Gronk was healthy in NE.

2014 was 134 Edelman, 131 Gronk, 119 LaFell, and 77 Vereen. Brady doesn't spread it around as much as what Brees has done when people are healthy. I think that's why you see the change in 2015, so many injuries forced them to throw it around to others more than he normally does. Most years he targets 3-4 guys heavily and then of course the occasional looks for others, 1-2 a game, etc.

K
 
let cp live fellas. he is wearing his the u cape.

lulz at gates better than gonzalez.

ches with those stats showing how jimmy never was better than gronk :Nthat
 
let cp live fellas. he is wearing his the u cape.

lulz at gates better than gonzalez.

ches with those stats showing how jimmy never was better than gronk :Nthat

So, if The U is what I am caping for, why am I not pounding the table for Dre, or Portis, or Edge, or Lewis, or Sapp, and on and on and on?

Why do I have Gates as Goat, or Moss, etc?
 
those with some boot cut jeans, a deep v-neck, with a broncos mitchell and ness scarf and some ray bans [emoji]128293[/emoji][emoji]128133[/emoji][emoji]127995[/emoji]

:lol

and I can't believe anyone would realistically take Jimmy G over Gronk but CP doesn't budge, I give him that
 
let cp live fellas. he is wearing his the u cape.

lulz at gates better than gonzalez.

ches with those stats showing how jimmy never was better than gronk :Nthat

So, if The U is what I am caping for, why am I not pounding the table for Dre, or Portis, or Edge, or Lewis, or Sapp, and on and on and on?

Why do I have Gates as Goat, or Moss, etc?

good point. i retract my cape statement. i still dont get in what universe jimmy was better than gronk |I right now if the nfl was banned in the world and football ended, who are your top 5 TEs of all time in order 8o
 
Gates
Tony
Jimmy
Gronk
Sharpe

Off the top of my head. I don't know enough about Winslow to properly slot him.
 
When they were first starting out Aye Aye Ron Hernandez was (rightfully) considered the bigger receiving threat when compared to Gronk.

Seemed to play faster and had better hands. Gronk's obviously evolved since then and we know what happened to Aaron.
 
Gates
Tony
Jimmy
Gronk
Sharpe

Off the top of my head. I don't know enough about Winslow to properly slot him.

y u do dis cp :{ i respect your opinion. dont understand how jimmy is above gronk and sharpe but i can dig it. i guess thats the beauty about sports.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom