***Official Political Discussion Thread***



I’d add, that as far as I know, no one got “cancelled” over past jokes or past articles or past books. People like Louis CK and Bill Cosby and JK Rowling “cancelled” because of sexual improprieties, sexual assault, and bigotry.

I suppose Rogen is talking about certain comedians who were unable to book
college shows to the same extent that they were able to 30 years ago and interpret that to mean that they were cancelled. By that criteria, they were “cancelled” over old jokes but not as social censure. They get a smaller audiences, especially at colleges, because comedy is perishable and it’s damn near impossible to be a top tier comic for decades.
 
l6seqae7ba171.jpg
 
In theory, Cantwell filed her amendment to the bill because she genuinely wanted competition in NASA's efforts to build a landing system to send astronauts to the Moon, beginning as early as 2024. In reality, Cantwell's amendment is probably more accurately interpreted as an effort to support Blue Origin, which is based in the state she represents.

NASA genuinely wanted to have a competition for the lunar lander. But it selected only one company—SpaceX—in mid-April after Congress appropriated just a small amount of money in the fiscal year 2021 budget. SpaceX's total bid was only $2.9 billion, less than half that of its competitors, including the Blue Origin-led national team.

However, the way Cantwell's amendment was written would likely have slowed down NASA and its return to the Moon. Were the Cantwell amendment to be signed into law, NASA would have to reopen the competition, thus delaying work on the agency's return to the Moon and putting an already difficult target of 2024 into further jeopardy. Her amendment also ignored NASA's own plans to both create a lunar-lander competition as well as keep the possibility of a 2024 landing on track. Under NASA's plans, SpaceX would work at full speed toward the 2024 landing while a second company would be brought on to compete for subsequent landings.

I understand the need to foster competition for government contracts and I agree with the idea. Stuffing our overlords' pockets at a time when we have bigger priorities (like the erosion of our political system) is just very tone-deaf.
 
Back
Top Bottom