- 11,997
- 3,286
I agree with you on Manchin’s argument. I’m against the obstruction of the bill from either side of the aisle.
***Official Political Discussion Thread***
- Thread in 'General' Thread starter Started by rico x hood,
- Start date
I agree with you on Manchin’s argument. I’m against the obstruction of the bill from either side of the aisle.
- 4,407
- 4,660
Yesterday was the anniversary of Dumbkirk
- 42,637
- 178,224
- 42,637
- 178,224
- 42,637
- 178,224
aepps20
Supporter
- 42,469
- 90,389
They've tried everything they can baser on this chart. Nothing you can do. Destroying libs hasn't been tried which would work.
aepps20
Supporter
- 42,469
- 90,389
Guy in glasses is HANDSOME.
- 11,426
- 18,486
That labor shortage whining is so comical to me.
You often hear, “You may have to settle for a job which isn’t your ideal job or ideal pay”. But you never hear anyone tell these companies they may have to settle for employees who aren’t their ideal applicant or meet their desired qualifications.
A lot of these jobs aren’t rocket science. People are applying, it might not be their preferred applicant, but if you’re openly complaining to the media about how you can’t find workers, hire someone who doesn’t have your desired experience criteria but meets other intangibles.
I’ve seen some try to frame it as a qualified worker shortage. Qualified workers with necessary experience often have options to choose from. So who is to say they’re going to want to work at some of these rinky dink places when they likely have more desirable options to choose form.
You often hear, “You may have to settle for a job which isn’t your ideal job or ideal pay”. But you never hear anyone tell these companies they may have to settle for employees who aren’t their ideal applicant or meet their desired qualifications.
A lot of these jobs aren’t rocket science. People are applying, it might not be their preferred applicant, but if you’re openly complaining to the media about how you can’t find workers, hire someone who doesn’t have your desired experience criteria but meets other intangibles.
I’ve seen some try to frame it as a qualified worker shortage. Qualified workers with necessary experience often have options to choose from. So who is to say they’re going to want to work at some of these rinky dink places when they likely have more desirable options to choose form.
- 43,425
- 42,998
Why do you want to control women’s private parts?
- 43,425
- 42,998
Answer to ALL the problems is
pay them more
pay them more
pay them more
pay them more
pay them more
- 11,426
- 18,486
Oh that’s correct. But the party of personal accountability would rather whine, cry to the media saying no one wants to work and put stupid little signs up on their doors blaming unemployment (which ended in half the country two months ago) instead of taking actual personal accountability.
- 11,997
- 3,286
The body parts of men and women are controlled, quite a bit, by various laws.
As with many other laws, the question becomes at one point do you implement those restrictions to protect others.
I agree with the test in Roe for determining at what point the rights of the mother are balanced against the rights of the baby.
As I’m sure you know, Roe didn’t create an absolute right to abortion.
Last edited:
- 67,702
- 78,795
- 69,610
- 106,149
Why she thinks she'd be around that long?
- 8,610
- 17,152
Who they gonna sub in ?? 
- 11,997
- 3,286
- 151,001
- 202,329
- 67,702
- 78,795
'Get that **** outta here'This was before the ship went down
- 43,425
- 42,998
You didn’t answer my question. Why do YOU?
- 11,997
- 3,286
I don’t.
I also understand why there are laws that restrict activities by men and women that cause harm to others.
There are laws against homicide. That’s a restriction on your body. The idea that you can’t do whatever you want with your body if it harms others is not novel.
And there are laws that restrict what you can do with your body even if it just harms you: drugs, prostitution, seat belts, etc.
- 151,001
- 202,329
Black man getting fooled to benefit old rich white men, hate to see it
- 23,370
- 26,393
- 31,417
- 65,440
- 42,637
- 178,224
- 43,425
- 42,998
You vote as if you do several times. This is pathetic. This literally falls under your changing definition of pro life
